英语作文记叙文写作技巧【推荐20篇】

一：用介词短语替代从句，例：

原句：While they were playing tennis, she started an argument that lasted all morning.

修改后：During tennis she started an argument that lasted all morning.

原句：When you come to the second traffic light, turn right.

修改后：At the second traffic light turn left.

二：删除诸如"who is”或"that is"之类的关系代词，变从句为短语，例：

句：The novel, which is written in three parts, told a story that took place in the Middle Ages.

修改后：The three-part novel told a story set in the Middle Ages.

注：把句中的"three parts"改用形容词来表达，节省了四个不必要的单词"which is written in"。我们经常可以将关系代词如"that"去掉，这只会引起最少的变动。

三：剔除你不需要的单词，例：

Two joint partners will present their views over a long-distance telephone call.

写完这样的句子后，你自己再读一遍，挑出单词"joint"和"telephone"，注意删去不必要的词。

英语写作注意两点

一、先审题，弄清写作要求审题是写好作文的前提，也是书面表达的基础。如果写偏了题，语言表达再好也很难得高分。审题时要注意两个方面：

1.认真地看两遍题目，包括提示，全面了解写作要求。

2.理清思路，确定体裁、框架结构和内容。

二、用英语进行思维英语写作时必须排除汉语思维的干扰。

从现在起应逐渐加大阅读量和听的输入量，将阅读、听力训练与书面表达有机地结合起来。经常体会和领悟作者传递信息和表达思想的方式。在话题讨论和写作中经常运用所学到的表达方式就会有所创造。还要尽量做到“五多”：多看、多听、多思考、多用心体验和感悟身边的人和事、多用英语说和写自己的体验和感受。

读后感属于议论文的范畴，但又不同于一般的议论文。

一般议论文，要求观点明确，论据典型，论证严密;而读后感最突出的特点是“读”和“感”的紧密结合。“读”，指读了何人、何文，文中有何事、何观点;“感”，是指读后有何感受。“读”是“感”的基础，“感”是“读”的升华。就所读作品而言，“读”是“即”—对所读内容和感发点作必要的交代;“感”是“离”—根据感发点进行联想，谈感受。“感”是“读”互相作用，不可脱节。

“读”和“感”的结合，一般采用两种形式：一是边述读(交代所读内容)边发感;二是先述读后发感。原则上讲，先述读后发感的形式比较好把握，适合初学写读后感的同学选用。

要写好读后感，除掌握以上基本的文体知识外，还必须把握以下几个写作步骤：

一、研读原文。

只有研读好原文，才能对原文的内容和主旨有深刻全面的理解和把握，才能从中有所感悟，这是写好读后感的基础。

二、确立感发点。感发点是读后感的中心论点，又是文章的“入手处”。

一篇文，一本书，一部影视片，一出戏剧，内容有简有繁，线索有多有少，人物有主有次，观点有深有浅，写读后感不可能面面俱到。那么，怎样确立感发点呢?方法很简单。我们研读某篇作品后，必然会受到启发，有所感悟，而我们受启发最大、感悟最深的那一点(或几点)，就可以确立为“感发点”。例如：写人为主的记叙文，感发点往往是人物最突出的精神、思想、品格等特点或最有价值的言论、行动。写事为主的记叙文，感发点往往是事件中所包含的意义、所反映的某种问题或普遍性的规律。议论文的感发点，一般是所读议论文的中心论点或分论点。其他文体感发点的确立的与此大同小异，不一一赘述。

三、述读与发感。

述读，指对所读文章的出处、篇名、作者、感发点等方面的交代，目的是使读者明白这篇读后感的由来，要发什么感。这些交代是必不可少的，否则，就会让读者不明白你的“感”由何而发。发感，是在述读和感发点的基础上，展开联想与引申，联系实际进行发挥，这是文章的主体部分。

联想与引申的原则是，要围绕感发点，要与原文材料有密切的联系。对联系的内容和实际还要进行必要的分析、议论或抒情，这样“感”才会深刻。这也是展开读后感主体部分最主要的方法。

另外，在论证感发点的过程中，要注意把两种论据紧密结合起来，一是所读原文的材料，二是联想和引申的材料。

四、读后感的结尾

结尾可概括中心，总结全文，或提出问题，发表看法，发人深思。“文无定则”，内容决定形式，采用什么形式结尾，要根据读后感的类型而定。

古人写文章很讲究开头，称之“凤头”，西方的谚语也这样说：好的开头是成功的一半。

开头的方法有很多，如比喻开头法(山如眉黛，小屋恰似眉梢的痣一点。——《我的空中楼阁》)、引言开头法(鲁迅先生有两句诗：“横眉冷对千夫指，俯首甘为孺子牛。”这是他自己的写照，也是他作为伟大作家的全部人格的体现)、议论开头法(生命是一个选择的过程。在这过程中，有人“利”字为先，好处抢尽;有人“荣”字当前，虚实兼收;亦有人“德”字为重，铁肩道义。)、入物开头法(很久很久以前，也许在我的生命之树发芽的时候，我的生命之神就告诉我，我是一只火凤凰。那时幼稚的心灵无法参透凤凰的含义，长大了也是。)、写人开头法(夏日炎炎。鲁林从省城公安大学放假回家，来到A城地面，此地距离其老家梁山泊尚有一段路程，须乘班车，方可上路。)、叙事开头法(一年夏天，我和妻坐着海轮到了一个有名的岛上。——鲁彦《听潮》)、描景开头法(陌生的山花已有无数的开了。冷月下，却只见一犁春水，蓦然回首，总是充盈着泪水的双眼遥望寂灭的星空，总是随风飘动的思绪感叹树叶的凋零。——一考生《美丽一次》)、绘境开头法(十五那天，天热得发了狂。太阳刚一出来，地上已经像下了火。一些似云非云，似雾非雾的灰气低低地浮在空中，使人觉得憋气。——老舍《在烈日和暴雨下》)、定情开头法(我与父亲不相见已二年有余了，我最不能忘记的是他的背影。——朱自清《背影》)。

但究竟如何开头需要因文而定，因人而定，“文有定法，文无定法”就是这个问题。只要能够使阅卷者更好地理解和把握文章，且富有感染力和吸引力，就是成功的文章开头。

1.用形容词"very"，"single"等表示强调

eg.You are the very person Im looking for.

你就是我要找的那个人。

Red Army fought a battle on this very spot.

红军就在此地打过一仗。

Not a single person has been in the office this afternoon.

今天下午竟然没有一个人来过办公室。

2.用反身代词表示强调

e.g.I myself will see her off at the station.

我将亲自到车站为她送行。

You can do it well yourself.

你自己能做好这件事情。

3.用助词"do/does/did+动词原形"表示强调

e.g.The baby is generally healthy，but every now and then she does catch a cold.

那孩子的健康状况尚好，但就是偶尔患感冒。

Do be quiet.I told you I had a headache.

务必安静，我告诉过你，我头疼。

4.用"...and that"，"...and those"，等结构表示强调

e.g.They fulfilled the task，and that in a few days.

他们在几天内完成的就是那项任务。

I gave her some presents，and those the day before yesterday.

前天我送给她的就是那些礼物。

5.用双重否定结构表示强调

e.g.There is no reason why this new immigrant should not have the same success.

完全有理由相信这些新移民应该拥有相同的成功。

A man can never have too many ties.

一个男人有再多的领带也不为过。

I cant thank you too much.

我无论怎样感谢你都不过份。

A mother can never be patient enough with her child.

I am not unfaithful to you.我对你无比忠诚。

6.用短语"in every way"，"in no way"，"by all means"，"by no means"，"only too"，"all too"，"but too"，"in heaven"，"in the world"，"in hell"，"on earth"，"under the sun"等表示强调

e.g.His behaviour was in every way perfect.

他的举止确实无可挑剔。

The news was only too true.

这消息确实是事实。

Where in heaven were you then?

当时你到底在哪里?

7.用倒装句表示强调

8.用强调句型表示强调

It is that或 It is who

e.g.It was the headmaster who opened the door for me.

正是校长为我开的门。

It was yesterday that we carried out that experiment.

就是在昨天我们做了那个实验。

记叙文以叙事为主， 记叙文以叙事为主，我们要把事情发 生的经过， 生的经过，时间、 时间、地点、 地点、人物写清楚。 人物写清楚。

还有就是对这些事情的态度和看法。

还有就是对这些事情的态度和看法。

写谁(作文对象) 发生在活动场 写谁(作文对象)：发生在活动场 地的竞赛、劳动、爬山等事情。 地的竞赛、劳动、爬山等事情。

写什 竞赛 等事情 么(作文目的)：反映作者对这些事情 作文目的) 的态度和看法。 的态度和看法。

怎样写： 怎样写：通过一件事或几件事说 明作文的目的。 明作文的目的。

写法：叙述事件，还可以在事件 写法：叙述事件， 中进行有效的肖像、语言、心理、 中进行有效的肖像、语言、心理、动 肖像 作、细节描写。

注意事项：作文过程 细节描写。注意事项： 中，必须坚持始终要与所写这些事情 的态度和看法相联系。 的态度和看法相联系。

一、交代清楚事件发生的时间、 交代清楚事件发生的时间、 地点、人物、起因、经过和结果， 地点、人物、起因、经过和结果，即 六要素。一件事总离不开这六要素 六要素。一件事总离不开这六要素， 把这方面写清楚了， 把这方面写清楚了，才能使读者了解 事件的来龙去脉。 事件的来龙去脉。

二、要围绕作文的中心选择事 件，要选择最能表现作文中心思想的 事件做为材料， 事件做为材料，生活中有不少新鲜有 趣和激动人心的事。因此， 趣和激动人心的事。因此，我们平日 要多观察，多想生活中遇到的事。 要多观察，多想生活中遇到的事。选 材要新颖，在别人的作文中常出现的 材要新颖， 事要少写或不写， 事要少写或不写，这样写出来的作文 才有吸引力，有新鲜感。 才有吸引力，有新鲜感。

三、事件的主要部分要写具体。 事件的主要部分要写具体。 每件事都有起因、 每件事都有起因、经过和结果这样一 个过程，只有把这个过程写清楚， 个过程，只有把这个过程写清楚，给 读者的印象才能完整而深刻。

读者的印象才能完整而深刻。在事件 中要进行有效的肖像、语言、心理、 中要进行有效的肖像、语言、心理、 动作、细节描写，这一点很重要， 动作、细节描写，这一点很重要，这 样写出来的作文才生动。 样写出来的作文才生动。要突出中 心，详略得当，与主题无关的事不写 详略得当。

例文： 一次难忘的经历

那天是我的生日，爸妈带我去购 天是我的生日礼物。出来的时候看到几十个人围在路边，天生喜欢看热闹的我便不自觉挤 到了人群中—— 到了人群中—— 啊，原来是一位乞讨者。

她衣衫褴褛，满头银丝，她露在嘴唇外面牙齿参差不齐的裸 露在嘴唇外面，左眼失去了光彩。跪在地上，嘴中呢喃着，仿佛在说：求求你们可怜可怜我， 给我几块钱 吧，我已经好几天没吃东西了。

我已经好几天没吃东西了。 看到这里我毫不犹豫地拿出十块钱，刚要给她，手却又收了回来， 十块钱，刚要给她，手却又收了回来， 因为我看到她面前的铁罐里只有几毛钱。看看围观的人群，人们无动于衷毛钱。看看围观的人群，人们无动于衷观看的人群，只是好奇地看着她，并且指指点 只是好奇地看着她，指指点点议论纷纷，好可怜啊， “指指点点议论纷纷 ，好可怜啊， 快点救救 她啊! 她啊! ”“给她些钱吧! 给她些钱吧! ”

“ 甚至有几个年轻人说 Ho,my God! 好恐怖啊，快点走! ” 好恐怖啊，快点走!说给钱的却也不给钱，说走的却也不走，只是围在那里看着……我厌恶的看着这群围观的人，心里 鄙视他们： “ 鄙视他们：难道你们连一块钱也拿不出来吗?”却不知自己把钱收回的 那一刻，已经和他们一样了。

这时，挤进来一个小男孩，满脸的 天真稚气，摇着手，把一块钱硬币丢 入了她的钱盒里， 入了她的钱盒里，硬币与铁盒相撞发 出清脆的响声……这声音在人群中荡开去，人们不再议论纷纷，人群一下子安静下来，大家纷纷开始从身上掏钱……

我也掏出身上所有的钱悄悄放入铁盒 中……

感谢这个小男孩 ， 这清脆的响声，不经唤醒了麻木的人群，也涤荡了人们的灵魂，抚慰了人们即将冷漠 的心灵。

多长时间过去了这响声还时 常回荡在我耳边，激励着我： 常回荡在我耳边，心怀悲 悯，与人为善……

怎样写好文章 古人说： 凤头，猪肚，豹尾。 ( “ 古人说： 凤头，猪肚，豹尾。”

元 朝陶宗仪《南村辍耕录》 朝陶宗仪《南村辍耕录》中引乔梦符 的话)意思是要重视文章的开头， 的话)意思是要重视文章的开头，设 计一个好的开头会使文章增加色彩， 计一个好的开头会使文章增加色彩， “凤头”的意思是“美”。

要美，不 凤头”的意思是“ 要美， 能单纯认为就是词藻美，语句美， 能单纯认为就是词藻美，语句美，而 是能抓住读者， 引人入胜， 这也是美。 是能抓住读者， 引人入胜， 这也是美。

开头引入的要求是切题， “ 开头引入的要求是切题 ， 美 ” ， 吸引读者。 吸引读者。

渲染就是能用简要的语句 将其意突出，抓住读者， 将其意突出，抓住读者，正如李渔在 《闲情偶寄》中说“以奇句夺目，使 闲情偶寄》中说“以奇句夺目， 之一见而惊，不敢弃去。 之一见而惊 ，不敢弃去 。

当然这是 ” 写诗的要求， 写诗的要求，写文也如此， 写文也如此，不是“奇” 不是“ 而是真， 逼真” 如同在眼前。铺垫 而是真， 逼真” 如同在眼前。 “ ， 就是做些必要的铺陈和垫衬 引入、渲染、铺垫的方式很多， 引入、渲染、铺垫的方式很多， 如： 交待环境，引入人物、事件。 交待环境，引入人物、事件。

如 《孔乙己》 孔乙己》 点出所写的对象、 点出所写的对象、人、事。如《我 的老师》 的老师》 开门见山，点明题旨，交待写作开门见山，点明题旨， 动机。 《一件珍贵的衬衫 动机。如《背影》 一件珍贵的衬衫》 背影》 一件珍贵的衬衫》 《 解题，为全文奠定感情基调。 解题，为全文奠定感情基调。

如 《白杨礼赞》 白杨礼赞》 紧扣叙事，直抒胸臆。 紧扣叙事，直抒胸臆。如《谁是 最可爱的人》 最可爱的人》 描写环境，渲染气氛， 描写环境，渲染气氛，为情节发 展作铺垫， 如 多收了三五斗》 《故 、 展作铺垫， 《多收了三五斗》 《故 乡》 设置疑团， 制造悬念， 引人入胜。 设置疑团， 制造悬念， 引人入胜。

结尾要引出、照应、 升华， 结尾要引出 、 照应 、 升华 ， 就是 把读者从具体的事件、人物中引出， 把读者从具体的事件、人物中引出， 使记叙完整， 使记叙完整，并把读者引回更为广阔 的社会现实中， 的社会现实中 ， 引向更为深远的境 界 。古人说“豹尾” 就是结尾要有 古人说“ 豹尾” ， 画龙点睛” 有精神， 力 ，且 “画龙点睛 ” 有精神， 有神 ， 采，就是余味无穷，发人深思，给读 就是余味无穷，发人深思， 者以精神境界或思想认识上的飞跃 提高。这就是升华。 提高。这就是升华。 结尾引出、照应、升华的方式 结尾引出、照应、 很多， 很多，如：自然收束，回味无穷。

如 自然收束，回味无穷 《小桔灯》、《背影》 小桔灯》、《背影》 》、《背影富有感染力的抒情。 富有感染力的抒情。如《谁是 最可爱的人》 最可爱的人》 含蓄深刻带有启发式，发人深思。 含蓄深刻带有启发式，发人深思。 如《荔枝蜜》、《故乡》、《多收了 荔枝蜜》、《故乡》、《多收了 》、《故乡》、《 三五斗》 三五斗》 呼应开头，点明主题。

呼应开头，点明主题。如《一件 小事》、《一件珍贵的衬衫》 小事》、《一件珍贵的衬衫》 》、《一件珍贵的衬衫 古人讲究“首尾圆合”，“首句 标其目， 卒章显其志。 (白居易 ” 《新 乐府序》“标其目”就是揭示文章的 题旨。 “卒章”就是文章结尾。 “志” 就是主旨。 强调开头夺目， 结束升华。 清朝李渔《闲情偶寄》中“务使开门 见山，不当借帽覆顶”，形象地说明开头不应该把“山”，题旨遮挡住。 宋朝沈义父《乐府指迷》中强调“结 句须要放开， 含有余不尽之意。 “须 ” 要” 必须要放开， 结尾要 “长留余味” ， 要响亮，像唐朝白乐天《金针诗格》 中说 “落句欲似高山放石， 一去不回。

散文是一种是一种最常见的文学体裁。由于它取材广泛，艺术表现形式丰富多样，如同五彩斑斓的风景画，让人陶醉，让人喜爱。作者在散文中的形象比较明显，常用第一人称叙述，个性鲜明。正像巴金所说“我的任何散文里都有我自己”，总之可以说是表现自我。(也有虚构与刻画，比如周晓枫的散文，别具一格)写自己需要勇气，需要大胆无忌。正如鲁迅所说“任意而谈，无所顾忌”，比如刘半农所说，散文要“赤裸裸地表达”，写真实的“我”是散文的核心特征和生命所在——以情动人，一篇文章如果连自己都感动不了，你还希望去感动别人吗?

这里说说散文的几个主要特点：

一、时间跨度大

散文不受时间限制，前可以远涉古代，后可跨及未来，又可覆盖今天。现在流行一些大散文。从史铁生的《我与地坛》开始，余秋雨的《文化苦旅》掀起“文化大散文”热，到《人民文学》开办的非虚构栏目，比如李娟的草原牧场系列，梁鸿的《梁庄》，包括慕容雪村的《中国少了一位汤药》，可以算作非虚构小说，也可以当大散文去看(主要内容)。写历史性的散文，可以纵横五千年，也可以是一个朝代几百年的缩影;当然，也可以写一个人漫长的一生。许多人晚年的回忆录，基本上属于这一类型的文章。写这类文章一定要联想丰富，有感染力，文字要讲究，要不就容易写成一本流水账。(要透出生活的美、哲理，让人思考)

举例：《我的住房经历》、《遥望陕北》、《眺望长安》、《走进威海》等。

大家可以根据散文的这一特点，扩大时间跨度，多充实一些有关事件，插入多组镜头，来增加散文的内容和色彩，使文章多姿多彩，知识性强。

二、空间转换广

散文既不受时间限制，也不受空间限制，天南海北，空间宇宙，无不可以包容其中。如鲁迅的回忆性散文《藤野先生》，空间跨度从中国到日本，再从东京到仙台，又从仙台回到北京，接着又写走到厦门，空间跨度大，空间转换之多让人目不暇接，但写得层次分明，详略得当。要善于把复杂的人和事放在每个空间里，有的随意点染，有的泼墨描绘，错落有致，色彩斑斓。如果我们在写散文时注意到这个特点，就不大会犯单薄、贫乏的毛病。

三、事件牵涉多

写散文，多数离不开事件，尤其是叙事散文，事件是散文的“硬件”。许多好的散文有一个中心事件，以及烘托连带的一些与之有关的其它事件。如袁鹰的散文《井冈翠竹》，写井冈山的竹子做过武器杀伤敌人，做过竹筒盛粥，做过红军的扁担挑着中国革命从井冈山走到延安，走到北京。新中国成立后，竹子又被派上了建设社会主义的新用场……事件多得让人应接不暇。

四、表达方式活

散文表达方式非常灵活，一般长于抒情。

散文的“散”，并非散漫，它散而不乱。较之小说、戏剧等在结构、表达方面，更为自由灵活;比起消息、通讯、报告文学等新闻体裁来，它以真事为基础，可以加工虚构。新闻体裁主要写别人，而散文既可以写别人，也可以写自己;通常文中有“我”，便于直接抒情。(比如《故乡的老槐树》)

散文常用记叙、说明、抒情、议论、描写等表达方式。茅盾名篇《白杨礼赞》，就综合地运用了多种表达方式，如文章开头就记叙和描写了汽车在黄土高原上奔驰看到的黄土高原的外貌，用抒情和议论点明了白杨树的象征意义。这些方式的运用，有力地表达了主题，使文章气势浩大，摄人心魄。散文的表达方式自由灵活。在一篇作品中，叙述、描写、抒、议论都可以用。不少散文都采用直抒臆的写法，来表达作者的思想。比如梁衡的散文《一个尘封垢埋却愈见光辉的灵魂》,这篇文章最初是发表在我们《新叶》上的，影响很大，国内许多知名期刊纷纷打电话要稿，后来《北京文学》等期刊又发表了。这篇文章(展开一下)还有《觅渡，觅渡，觅何处?》，写党的早期领导人瞿秋白的，提出他不是被杀害，而是被自己人举起屠刀杀害的!有思想，有高度，有胆识。这种大气概的散文，不是一般人能够写出来的。

贾平凹的小说为他赢得了声誉，但他的散文是公认的大师级文字，建议同学们多看看。

周晓枫是一位新散文运动的代表人物，我们看看她的《兽皮上的地图》，里面写了蛇、蝴蝶、豹子等各种动物。她的多篇散文被选入中学课本。她的语言信手拈来，云谲波诡，繁复缜密。她描写蝴蝶：“精湛而完美的对称。作为挑剔的唯美主义者，蝴蝶只允许自己重复一次，如同一本只包含两页的书，却已经翻倍于人身。蝴蝶是不是史前的拓片?让人猜测图案出自异邦石头上灿烂的刻划。让人想起奇迹，想起深宫的爱情、枕于废墟的睡眠。一只蝴蝶秘密到来，在花瓣上的停留短暂而轻柔，怀着随时告别的哀婉。像一张小型的华丽地图，抑或来自天堂的请柬。蝴蝶过分的美让我们忽略娇小的舞娘身世凄凉——它的昨天丑陋卑贱，明天很快落叶飘零，蝴蝶只有今天，只有挥霍正在熄灭中的彩焰。”

在网上下载这篇文章，七千余字我看了一个多小时，几乎是一字一句地读下来的。作者由形象的斑纹到抽象的斑纹、由斑纹到生物习性到对生命本质的思考、由生命现象到对神秘自然的敬畏。由斑纹联想到美女的文身、病变的皮肤、母亲的妊娠纹、遇害者的抓痕，进而说明斑纹无处不在，就像我们有意修饰并损害的生活。

阅读的过程中，我想起法布尔的《昆虫记》。是的，这不是一篇简单的说明文，也不是一般的散文作品。她颠覆了传统的语境，呈现给我们的是炫目靓丽的色彩和动感多姿的画面。她的语言具有惊人的创造力和爆发力，看似漫不经心，却有着震撼人心的力量，如同欣赏高更、塞尚的油画，那种华美，那种丰赡，那种考究和纯粹，组成一曲神秘博大的交响曲，冲撞着你的灵魂。评论家谢有顺说：“当散文写作日益成为文人养病的方式时，周晓枫的散文却依旧保持着锐利、沉着、优雅的面貌。加上她那鲜明的散文文体意识、语言探索精神，她的写作在当代散文界已经独具一格。”

周晓枫不是一出道形成这样风格的。在一篇访谈里，她说我原来是个狂热的修辞爱好者，常常舍本逐末地，对诸如比喻、结构的形式感、词语光亮度的细节重视，超过作品的整体关注──这是特点，也是缺陷。像一个不算高明的芭蕾舞者，当然她的步伐可能比常态的行走更有难度和美感，但我怀疑，这种锥立的舞蹈是否太过飘摇和脆弱，承担不了力量，也影响速度。我一直佩服那些敢说以游戏态度写作的，有多么大的才华和天赐的好运才能举重若轻。有限的才能不允许我信口信腕、涉笔成趣。我对待写作很认真。认真是个谈不上褒贬的判断──如果你写得好，它就是对认真的报答;如果写得不好，认真就是对你加倍的嘲讽。

有些人写了一辈子，制造了很多垃圾，怨天尤人，从来没想过为什么。

是的，她颠覆了传统，也颠覆了自己。她是文本写作的叛逆者。她远离喧嚣，在人迹罕至处留下一串自己的脚印

五、勾连全文，神散而形不散

散文的取材，可谓“杂乱”有章。既使思路开阔，包容量大，又使散文紧紧围绕作者的意图而不“越轨”。秦牧说写散文最不能丢的是“思想的红线”。即用一个醒目深刻的思想，把看似散乱的一大堆材料，贯穿成文。若把这一个个事件喻作“珍珠”，真可叫做“红线穿珠”了。

从形式上来看，一般散文的篇幅一般都比较短小，题材却很广泛广为流传的散文，篇幅都很短小，如柳宗元的《永州八记》和范仲淹的《岳楼记》等都只有几百字。由于语言的发展和社会的变化，现代散文比起古代散文来相对的说要长一些，但也不宜过长，更不能以长为贵。像鲁迅先生的《朝花夕拾》、《草》几乎都是短文;还有茅盾的《白杨赞》、《风景谈》，朱自清的《背影》、《荷塘月》、《绿》等也都很短。杨朔的《茶花赋》那就更短了，只有九百字，而《荔枝蜜》也只有1700字，就把自己感的变化表达的淋漓尽致。我以前写的散文也比较短，比如《父亲的寿辰》、《我的小屋》等等，但是后来的散文就比较长了，比如《我的房子我的事》有一万多字;《家丑》有两万多字。一般的也都有四、五千字。因为要表达的内容很多，感觉短的篇幅无法满足，那就只好信马由缰地写，写完后把认为多余的部分可以删去，感觉没有说透的地方还可以再增加一些东西。比如我写《眺望长安》的时候，陕西小吃那一节就是一点点加上去的，还查了一些资料。现在查资料比较容易，百度一下就行了，不像过去需要翻很多书。《辞海》也不方便。

这里需要说明的是，篇幅短小，但不能简单浮浅，“尺幅千里，必当言微意深”。像过去所说的，“宇宙之大，苍蝇之微”都可以当做散文的题材。有时，写短文反倒很难。我写《华山之巅》用了两天，两千多字。同样是写华山，《带着女儿爬华山》四千多字，用了一个晚上。因为一个随意，一个是给报纸用的。

散文当然可以写金戈铁马似的重大题材，但更可以选择生活中“不起眼”的小事来做文章。越是那些被忽视的、司空见惯的东西，越能体现作者的写作技巧;越是别看得见而说不出，而“我”看见后能道出来的生活琐事，越能体现作者的敏锐嗅觉;越能体现作者的独到见解。它既可以海阔天空，说东道西，也可以贪小求全，取其片段，以小见大;比如贾平凹的《丑石》、《商州初录》、《商州又录》以及写父亲、母亲、妻子、女儿和朋友的文章。有一篇《人病》，道尽世态万千，世态炎凉，看了令人非常感概，非常到位和传神。

六、散文语言一定要生动传神。

可以优美，也可以是家常话，所谓大丑大美，一般写作者做不到。但是一定不要故意堆砌辞藻，这是行文的大忌。好的散文语言是非常讲究的，比如周晓枫的散文，可谓语不惊人死不休。推荐大家看看她写蛇、写蝙蝠、写各种人物内心世界的疼痛感的文字，非常到位。

这里欣赏一段《斑纹》关于蛇的描写：“著名的长腰，为了标明逶迤的长度。它省略四肢，只生出用以装饰的头与尾。这是最简约的设计，几乎躯体的每一部分都相仿。无论静止还是游动，斑纹加重了观察者的视觉混乱。密布全身的鳞片组成斑斓的图案，一条蛇，夸耀用心险恶的美。”

散文特别注意语言优美，美在什么地方?各家说法不一，有的说朴素简练，有的说文采飞扬;有的说富于韵，有的说潇洒自如;有的推崇亲切流畅的“谈话风”，有的则注重错综美与节奏感。这些语言的特点，不可能在一篇散文中同时出现，但却是一般散文中常见的。

导语：好的句子正确运用能给作文带来意想不到的效果，下面是yuwenmi小编为大家整理的英语作文，欢迎阅读与借鉴，谢谢!

1. According to a recent survey， four million people die each year from diseases linked to smoking.依照最近的一项调查，每年有4，000，000人死于与吸烟有关的疾病。

2. The latest surveys show that quite a few children have unpleasant associations with homework.最近的调查显示相当多的孩子对家庭作业没什么好感。

3. No invention has received more praise and abuse than Internet.没有一项发明像互联网一样同时受到如此多的赞扬和批评。

4. People seem to fail to take into account the fact that education does not end with graduation.人们似乎忽视了教育不应该随着毕业而结束这一事实。

5. An increasing number of people are beginning to realize that education is not complete with graduation.越来越多的人开始意识到教育不能随着毕业而结束。

6. When it comes to education， the majority of people believe that education is a lifetime study.说到教育，大部分人认为其是一个终生的学习。

7. Many experts point out that physical exercise contributes directly to a persons physical fitness.许多专家指出体育锻炼直接有助于身体健康。

8. Proper measures must be taken to limit the number of foreign tourists and the great efforts should be made to protect local environment and history from the harmful effects of international tourism.应该采取适当的措施限制外国旅游者的数量，努力保护当地环境和历史不受国际旅游业的不利影响。

9. An increasing number of experts believe that migrants will exert positive effects on construction of city. However， this opinion is now being questioned by more and more city residents， who complain that the migrants have brought many serious problems like crime and prostitution.越来越多的专家相信移民对城市的建设起到积极作用然而，越来越多的城市居民却怀疑这种说法，他们抱怨民工给城市带来了许多严重的问题，像犯罪和卖淫。

10. Many city residents complain that it is so few buses in their city that they have to spend much more time waiting for a bus， which is usually crowded with a large number of passengers.许多市民抱怨城市的公交车太少，以至于他们要花很长时间等一辆公交车，而车上可能已满载乘客。

11. There is no denying the fact that air pollution is an extremely serious problem： the city authorities should take strong measures to deal with it.无可否认，空气污染是一个极其严重的问题：城市当局应该采取有力措施来解决它

12. An investigation shows that female workers tend to have a favorable attitude toward retirement.一项调查显示妇女欢迎退休。

13. A proper part-time job does not occupy students too much time. In fact， it is unhealthy for them to spend all of time on their study. As an old saying goes： All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy.一份适当的业余工作并不会占用学生太多的时间，事实上，把全部的时间都用到学习上并不健康，正如那句老话：只工作，不玩耍，聪明的孩子会变傻。

14. Any government， which is blind to this point， may pay a heavy price.任何政府忽视这一点都将付出巨大的代价。

15.Nowadays， many students always go into raptures at the mere mention of the coming life of high school or college they will begin. Unfortunately， for most young people， it is not pleasant experience on their first day on campus.当前，一提到即将开始的学校生活，许多学生都会兴高采烈。然而，对多数年轻人来说，校园刚开始的日子并不是什么愉快的经历。

一、抒情议论入题

议论中饱含着浓郁的情感色彩，赋予议论以强烈的抒情性。议论的语言是理性思维的结果，因而也许少了一份灵动，俨然一副冷若冰霜的面孔。我们得由抒情议论入题，打破议论文板起面孔说教的束缚，语言清新灵秀，这样就更能引起读者共鸣。

文题举例：《捕捉理性的灵光》

求知的瞳孔放飞彩色的希望，那方黑色的沃土贮满流连，赫然印着“感情用事与理性分析”。是的，站在雨季边上，绵亘于高三的岁月，即将步入社会的熔炉，凭借直觉和感情亲疏去认知这个纷繁的世界，还是逻辑分析，理性判断，助长理性的羽翼?我愿意让生命喷薄，把羽翼淬火，去捕捉理性的灵光。(运用比喻的修辞手法，鲜明地表达观点，这样文章会更显生动，好像赋予了生命)

二、设问引用法

建议用一些提示语来开头，例如提示语：“你会因喜爱被过的皑皑白雪而对南国的椰林海风不屑一顾吗?你会因沉迷于江南的小桥流水、青瓦白墙而否定西北‘大漠孤烟直，长河落日圆’的美吗?你会因介意林黛玉‘使性子’二不看经典名著《红楼梦》吗?”以设问开篇引题，能够激发读者的思考，引起读者的阅读兴趣。

选文举例：《稳中求胜》

梁山智有吴用，道有公孙，武更是好汉如云。英雄如雨，却已宋江为首。蜀国谋赖孔明，勇让关张，却以刘备为王，东木西金，南水北火，却以戍土居中。何也?

宋公明为人沉稳，刘备做事敦厚，戍土谦稳厚实，终脱颖而出，施展风采，各得其所，故曰：为人沉稳，稳中求胜，吉。(回答问题，提出中心论点)

三、直接引论法

提示语：“虎啸深山，鱼翔浅底，驼走大漠，雁排长空。世间万物自有属于自己的一片天空……”开篇直接点明观点，表明的立场。

文题举例：《让纪念闪耀理性光芒》

纪念是内心情感的涌动，但又不是感情的无节制的挥霍;纪念需要行动来升华，但又需要理性的引导。

真正的纪念是心灵的回响，是历史的回音;它审视过去，启迪未来……(总领下文，过渡自然)

黑格尔曾经自夸德国人天生就是哲学家。然而就是这样一个天生严谨自律的民族，就在一个狂人的引诱下，陷入了战争的渊薮。60年前的那幕惨剧：生灵涂炭、妻离子散、血流成河……胜者在对往昔的审视中找到了道德的标杆，也找到了纪念的理由。

四、解题引论

文章还可以一开篇即诠释题目内涵，明确中心论点。环球网校老师还是告诉大家这样做的好处就是通过诠释概念来挖掘其深意，明确论述的方向。

文题举例：《防民之口，甚于防川》

“防民之口甚于防川”，顾名思义，就是提防人民之口比防河流决口更难。这就决定了当权者一定要做到“为川者决之使导，为民者宣之使言”，反之，将被历史的潮流、人民的吼声所吞没。

五、名言引论

提示语：“我用咖啡匙子量走了我的生命。”这是美国诗人艾略特早期诗作中的名言。以名言开篇，可以先声夺人。环球网校老师指出引用名人名言不仅可以表明自己的主观态度，还可以使用名言作为论点论据，好处是加强论述的性，为文章的展开埋下伏笔。

文题举例：《感时花溅泪》

我国诗人有云：“感时花溅泪，恨别鸟惊心。”其实，这句诗正说明了景随情牵的道理，对事物的认识和一个人感情有很大的关系。(引用诗句可以直接提出问题)

对于常人来说，一粒沙子就是沙子，而在诗人的眼里，一粒沙子可以弥漫整个世界。一粒水珠在诗人眼里便可折射出整个世界。因为诗人富于感情，对事物的认识便不同于一般人。“一千个读者有一千个哈姆雷特”，也可能是由于人们对事物感情的亲疏不同造成的。

六、比喻引题

以比喻开头，入题迅速，富有思辨色彩，语言讲究，有文采，令人耳目一新。比喻能够使复杂的道理简单化，使抽象的事物形象化。借助形象说理，生动活泼，增强吸引力，读者能够比较容易地掌握作者所要阐明的观点。

例：《天平和七弦琴》

理智和情感是人类生活中的两只脚印，人类在认知事物的道路上的每一次成长都和他们的理智与感情有关。(将理智和感情比作是人类生活中的两只脚印，首句即入题)

积累一些英语格言，对英文写作有一定的帮助。以下是小编带来的小学生经典英语格言，希望对你有帮助。

A cat may look at a king. 猫也可以看国王。

A friend in need is a friend in indeed. 患难识知已。

A good marksman may miss. 智者千虑，必有一失。

A good maxim is never out of season. 至理名言不会过时。

A good medicine tastes bitter. 良药苦口，忠言逆耳。

A good winter brings a good summer. 瑞雪兆丰年。

All roads lead to Rome. 条条道路通罗马。

Better early than late. 宁早勿晚。

Better late than never. 迟做总比不做好。

Great minds think alike.英雄所见略同。

It is good to learn at another man’s cost.前车可鉴。

It is never too late to learn. 活到老，学到老。

Love me, love my dog.爱屋及乌。

Men learn while they reach. 教学相长。

Second thoughts are best. 三思而后行 。

实际上，议论文也确实更稳妥，不容易偏题离题。考试吧高考网搜集高考议论文的写作技巧，希望对大家有帮助。

一、要掌握核心语段的基本结构

模式：主题句+支撑句1、2、3、4……

核心语段的组合不必太繁复，应追求中心清楚，层次明晰，所以一般采取总分结构，形成“主题句+支撑句”的形式。

中心句通常位于段首。支撑句从不同角度、深度、广度来证明主题句。支撑句可以按并列、递进、转折、因果、条件、承接等关系组合。

例如：①虚怀若谷，是人高尚情操的表现，也只有具备了这一点，才是健全的品格。②三国周瑜，年少有为，才智过人，堪称一代儒将。③可是面对足智多谋“运筹帷幄决胜于千里之外”的诸葛孔明，周瑜不是虚心向他人学习，而是忌妒诸葛亮的才华，不肯承认诸葛亮比自己棋高一着的事实，反而发出“既生瑜何生亮”的慨叹，最终忧愤而死。④这一史实说明了嫉妒的危害，它就像绊脚石，阻碍我们的发展，使我们不能清楚地认识自己的缺点，更不利于健康品格的形成。

【分析】此段采用了例证法。由四个句子组成。“主题句”是①，②③④是支撑句。第2句和第3句是转折关系第3句和第4句之间是承接关系。整段话清晰明白，有理有据。

主题句即观点句。其主要内容要用概括的关键词明确表达，后面的主题句才有充分展开分述的空间，也才能给结论留下回扣的对应点。例如：

自信比相信天命更有意义。(观点句)一般人通常喜欢相信天命，在他们的意识里，任何事物都归于上天的安排(过渡句)：生命从上天获得，健康有上天保佑，饮食靠上天赏赐，利益有上天赠与。(概括叙述现象)过分地相信上天，结果把自己的主权毫无条件地送给了神明，而不知道自己的命运要靠自己主宰的道理。(分析现象的危害)只有自信才能主宰自己的命运：黑暗的可以变成光明，悲伤的可以化为幸福，崎岖不平的道路可以铺成平坦光明的坦途。(阐释道理)要相信自己的生活幸福、精神愉快、前途光明都得靠自己争取，凡事靠自己的双手去创造，比依赖神明的支配不是更加实惠吗?(揭示普遍道理)

【分析】观点要靠事实说话，但这绝不意味着可以用观点加材料的简单公式便可以自然地得出结论。要知道，再典型的事例也只是个案，现象的背后都可能包含普遍的道理，但需要科学的归纳，理性的提炼。这个归纳和提炼的过程就是从感觉中提升感悟的过程。//这种思路通常的组织形式是：①段首观点句，②引用具体的事例(可以是单个经历，也可以是多则事件;可以是百态列举，也可以是世象组合。引用事例要把握一个尺度，如果是引用单个经历可以适当详细些，如果是多则事件就要采用排比或者定语扩展的方式记述，千万不能逐一展开详细的描述)，③对事件作分析评价，④揭示出普遍的社会属性或人生道理。

例如：《还有一个苹果》

坚定的信念是摆脱困境的制胜法宝。(段首观点句)//一场突然而至的沙尘暴，让一个穿越沙漠的独行侠迷失了方向，更可怕的是他的干粮和水包不幸被风暴卷走。翻遍所有的衣袋，他只找到一个泛青的酸苹果。可就是这个不起眼的苹果让他找到了求生的信念。他走过了不知多远的路程，摔了不知多个跟头，嘴唇干裂了无数道口子，衣服经历了无数便湿了又干，干了又湿的反复折腾。他的心中一直默念着：“我还有一个苹果……”，三天后，他终于走出了沙漠。(描述一个具体的事例)//沙漠独行侠的经历让我们悟出了一个人生的命题：只要你信念的旗帜不倒，你就又走出困境的可能。//在生命的旅程中，我们常常会遇到始料不及的挫折或失败，会身陷意外的困境，心遭不测的打击，这时，不要轻易地放弃。其实，只要心存不灭的信念，努力寻找，你会惊讶地发现事情远非想象的那么糟糕。 (对事件作分析评价)//只要你有战胜困难的勇气，你一定能够找到摆脱危险，渡过难关的“苹果”，握紧她，就没有穿越不了的沙漠。(揭示普遍的规律)

【解析】观点+事例+分析探究原因、目的等+阐述意义与价值等/重要意义、危害、严重后果(正反)

二、要掌握常规的展开方式

如何展开核心语段?最好的方法就是：以事实论据为基础，综合运用假设分析、比较分析、因果分析、引用分析、类比分析等。

1、假设分析。就是写完事例论据后，用假设的方法进行推理。(事例后+假设推理)

【示例】《耐住寂寞》

德国康德是闻名世界的大哲学家。但他一生都生活在一个小镇上，远离尘嚣，没有接受任何媒体的吹捧，没有参加过什么名流聚会，没有什么领导接见的风光，他在寂寞中领悟、思考、探索天地的哲理，路不断地在寂寞下延伸。(事例)//(假设)//如果他耐不住寂寞，把时间、精力都用于出名和享受世俗的热闹上，他的一生可能会“丰富”些，但是，他能成为德国古典哲学的宗师吗?

【示例】学会“照镜子”方能正确认识自己、提高自己。(观点)李世民懂得镜子的作用，能把魏征批评他的话写在屏风上，当作“镜子”，随时对照。又能看出“以铜为镜，可以正衣冠;以古为镜，可以知兴替;以人为镜，可以明得失。”(事例)//这难道不是一个很会“照镜子”的人吗?李世民正是做到了“以人为镜”“以古为镜”，学会在人们的各种批评、意见中认识自己，而成为一代名君。(评论)//假如当初唐太宗非但不听取魏征的逆耳忠言，而且因丑处被照，短处被揭，恼羞成怒而将“镜子”弃之，砸之，又哪能出现“贞观之治”的太平盛世?(假设推理)

▲语段模式：观点+事例+例后评论+例后假设推理

【方法点拨】(假言分析法)进行假设性的分析，如果你举的例子是正面的，那么你就从反面来假设分析;你举的例子是反面例子，你就从正面来进行假设。

2、正反对比法。就是在写完事例论据后引进比较加以分析，从而得出结论。例如《关注细节》：

列文虎克在关注细节中发现了细胞学说，齐白石在关注细节中创造了闻名中外的画法，鲁迅在关注细节中开创了中国现代小说的新时代。(事例)//相反，我们周围的一些人，对什么事都马马虎虎，对细节处毫不在意，最后一事无成。//两相比较，答案不是很明显吗?关注细节，收获精彩的人生;忽视细节，空留无穷的遗憾。(事例后+反例+比较分析)

【示例】俗话说：勤能补拙。(观点)//就拿我国明代的张溥来说吧，他小时候很“笨”，别人读一会儿就能背下来的东西，他往往要读几十遍才能背下来。但是，他并没有灰心，每拿到一篇文章，先认真抄一遍，校正好，再大声朗读一遍，然后烧掉，接着再抄。这样，一篇文章往往要抄六七遍。后来，他逐渐变得文思敏捷，出口成章。26岁写下了名扬天下的《五人墓碑记》。(正面事例)

相反，仲永5岁就能赋诗，可谓天赋出众。凭着聪明，他父亲带他四处作诗炫耀。仲永再也不思进取，长大以后，他变得庸庸碌碌，“泯然众人矣”! (反面事例，注意其转述的简洁及侧重点)

不难看出，张溥虽然很“笨”，但他肯勤学苦练，正是勤学苦练才使他的文思变得逐渐敏捷起来;而仲永虽然天赋出众，但他后来不思进取，终致庸庸碌碌，“泯然众人矣”! (分别对两个事例作对比分析论证)//由此可见，尽管先天智力因素的差异不可否认，但后天的勤奋则能弥补先天智力上的不足。(总结)

▲语段结构：观点+正面事例+反面事例+事例后的对比分析+总结

【示例】好集体不会埋没人才。(观点)//孙膑与庞涓同出于鬼谷子门下。他们二人可说是精于谋略，都是不可多得的人才。但是当孙膑来到庞涓任职的魏国时，庞涓嫉妒他的才能，表面恭敬内心狠毒，多次向魏王进谗言，以致使孙膑被挖去膝盖骨，不得施展其才能。而齐王听说孙膑之才，不惜费尽心力，将孙膑请到齐国，委以重任。齐军才有了马陵道之胜。(举一反例与一正例)

同是孙膑为何落得两种境遇呢?(抓信矛盾点，设问，因果探究)

就是因为他效劳于优劣不同的两个统治集团。在魏国，庞涓只图私利，妒贤嫉能，魏王昏庸，偏听偏信，而且缺乏识别千里马的伯乐眼光。孙膑在这样一个集体中，如何施展大志呢?而齐王任贤用能，身边的臣子也不像庞涓那样谋私，因而上下齐心，孙膑在此，正得以充分发挥作用。(因果分析法)//可见，好集体不会埋没人才。(总结，观点)

【点评】一个正面的例子，一个反面的例子放在一起，接下来要对这个例子从正反两方面进行对照分析，突出“好集体不会埋没人才”的观点。

▲语段模式：观点+事例(一反例与一正例)+例后(设问+因果分析)+总结观点

3、因果分析。就是写完事例论据后进行论据推导，得出结论。例如话题《爱心》：

《园丁之歌》中那个陶力，当初是那么的贪玩顽皮，使每一个教他的老师都感到头痛，叫苦不迭。(事例)//但是为什么他的班主任于老师能够使他走上正路，认真学习呢?(设问)//(揭示原因)//原因是于老师采取了适当的方法，使陶力有个适宜的成长环境。于老师之所以能够这样做，是因为他对学生有一颗爱心。(事例后+设问+揭示原因)

为加强论证的深度，还可以使用“因果链”的形式。例如：

因为有了诚信，所以人与人之间的关系就更为和谐;关系更为和谐，就能大大提高办事的效率;效率提高了，整个社会就能不断地进步。//可见，诚信是社会进步的明灯，是历史前进的灯塔。

【示例5】靠奋斗冲破“埋没”的压力。(观点)古今中外，许多取得了重大成就的人，很多都遭受过“埋没”的命运。爱因斯坦就曾被埋没在一个专利局中，充当小职员的平凡角色。但他没有灰心，抓紧一切机会进行研究，终于开创了物理学的新天地。华罗庚曾“埋没”在小店铺里，但他没有消沉，每天在做好营业工作后，抓紧一分一秒的时间，昼夜不停，寒暑不辨，刻苦自学，潜心钻研数学，终成著名的数学家。(事例)为什么他们没有因“埋没”而“窒息”，并且能有建树?//(设问+因果分析)//因为他们不甘心忍受被“埋没”的命运;不管在怎样不利的情况下，他们始终没有丧失向上的勇气和力量;他们坚信：不失千里之志的千里马，终有奋蹄腾飞的日子。//因此，他们在“埋没”的情况下，不是怨天尤人，而是努力拼搏奋斗，终于冲破“埋没”，脱颖而出。(分析总结)

▲语段模式：观点+事例+例后(设问+因果分析)+分析总结

【方法点拨】(探因分析法)作者在列举受因斯坦和华罗庚之例后，运用探因分析法，一层深一层地提示了他们冲破“埋没”的原因：不甘被埋没，坚信能冲破埋没，努力拼搏奋斗。从而使事例很好地论证了论点。

【示例】人贵有自知之明。对自己有准确的认识，才不会被别人的评价所蒙蔽。邹忌的妻、妾和客出于私心，异口同声地肯定邹忌比美丽的城北徐公更美，但邹忌没有被假象迷惑。为什么邹忌能透过妻、妾和客的交口称赞的表象发现问题的本质呢?因为他时刻保持着清醒的头脑，有自知之明。邹忌对自己的清醒认识，使他没有迷醉在虚假的光环之下，并借此发掘出了治国安邦的道理。由此可见，自知之明多么重要。

4、引用分析。就是写完事例论据后再引用名言、诗句等，然后结合对名言、诗句的阐释发挥和事例论据一同进行分析。例如，话题《不要为打翻的牛奶哭泣》：

明代历史学家谈迁花费二十年心血，收集大量资料，历尽许多艰难，终于完成了历史巨著《国榷》。但是刚完成时，被小偷偷走了。世间没有比这更痛苦残忍的了。面对此打击，谈迁在痛苦中毅然决定：重写《国榷》!又一个二十年过去了，一部更高水平的《国榷》展现在世人面前。(事例)//读书至此，我想到了普希金的诗句：“假如生过欺骗了你，不要悲伤，不要心急!忧郁的日子里，需要镇静。相信吧，快乐的日子将会来临!”(引用名人名言)//我们要从过去中吸取经验教训，而不要让过去成为负担，换句话说——不要为打翻的牛奶哭泣!(事例后+名人名言+围绕观点进行阐述分析)

5、类比分析。就是使用类比的方法，在话题之外引用一个类比物，通过对二者相似点的分析推理得出结论。例如论述“感情的亲疏和对事物的认知”：

其实探知也如同喝茶的艺术，我们泡茶的时候，第一遍淡洌，第二遍沉香，为什么第三遍才最爽口宜人?因为前两遍冲去了茶叶上的蜡质和灰尘，第三遍才泡出了茶叶的真纯之味。(类比物)//我们探知也是如此，(话题)//在对事物的认知上，越过感情布下的迷雾，抛过感情亲疏的羁绊，用一尘不染的心灵，轻装上路，才能取得丰硕的成果，领悟认知的真谛。(分析二者相似点推理得出结论)

(类比物+话题+分析二者相似点推理得出结论)

6、同类归纳法。所举之例应为同类例子，并且在分析论述时要紧扣论点找出相同点。

【示例三】只有付出，才有收获。(观点)左思为写《三都赋》闭门谢客，数载耕耘。三九严冬，笔耕不辍;三伏酷暑，意兴犹酣。多少白日，三餐忘食;多少夜晚，独对孤灯。“衣带渐宽终不悔”的执着，换来了丰硕的成果，《三都赋》轰动全城，一时洛阳纸贵。英国物理学家法拉第，为了揭示电和磁的奥秘整整奋斗了十年，十年中，他不懈地努力，却不断地失败;不断地失败，却又不懈地努力。十年之后，他成为揭示电磁奥秘的第一人。(事例)

左思和法拉第，不同时代，不同国籍，不同的研究领域，而他们成功的道路却是相同的——付出，无悔地付出。付出心血和汗水，付出精力和智慧。 (同类归纳评论)

▲语段模式：观点+事例后+同类归纳评论

【示例】乐观是成功的保证。(观点)牛顿发明地心引力学说的时候，全世界人反对他;哈费发明血液循环学说的时候，全世界人反对他;达尔文宣布进化论的时候，全世人反对他;贝尔第一次造电话的时候，全世界人讥笑他;莱特初用苦功于制造飞机的时候，全世界人讥笑他。讲到孙中山先生，最初在南洋演讲革命救国的时候，有一次听的人只有三个。(事例)

但这许多人都因抱着乐观主义的精神，而为后世所称道。也正因有了极强烈而有效的乐观主义精神，他们才战胜各种艰难险阻取得胜利，获得了成功。(同类归纳评论)

▲语段模式：观点+事例后+同类归纳评论

7、叙议交融法：叙述交融法即叙中有议，议在叙中的一种分析方法。

【示例】人才到处都有，问题在于是否有人去发现他们。(观点)//追溯历史，要是萧何不与韩信几天几夜地谈话，他哪里知道韩信是天下无双的奇才呢?要是左光斗不在大雪之夜微服出访巧遇苦读的史可法，他怎会发现史可法是可造之才呢?要是没有伯乐深入马群调查研究，人们又怎么能鉴别出日行千里的良马呢?//(叙中有议，议在叙中)

【方法点拨】在论证过程中，将论据的叙述融于排比兼反问的说理之中，一箭双雕。做到语言简洁有力，信息含量丰富，逻辑性强。

8、运用基本的哲学思维。

哲学是一切科学的科学，是对自然和社会一切知识的提炼和概括。哲学观点有紧急基础和上层建筑的关系、全面的观点、发展的观点、普遍联系的观点。这些基本思想派生出一些子目，如：原因与结果、偶然与必然、现象与本质、对立与统一、外因与内因、量变与质变、实践与认识、主观与客观等。如论述“近墨者未必黑”：

我们知道，事物的变化是外因和内因共同作用的结果，而外因是变化的条件，内因是变化的根据，外因只能通过内因起作用。(哲学观点)//所谓“近墨者黑”，正是忽略了事物发展的内因而过分突出外因。//屈原身为楚国大夫时整个官场腐化堕落，私己而误国，周遭一片墨黑。唯独屈原忠心耿耿，众人皆醉而他独醒，即使被小人陷害也不改其救国之志。宁可“赴常流葬乎江鱼腹中”，也不“以皓皓之白蒙世之温蠖”。包拯坐镇开封府时，权贵大臣贪污受贿成风，皇亲国戚徇私枉法为盛。而包拯却独保清廉，铁面无私。(事例)//可见，近墨者变黑与否，关键还在于近墨者本人，在于他的人格、意志、判断力等。近墨者中的很大一部分人能“出污泥而不染”，自始至终不被周围不良事物所左右。(分析推理得出结论)

(哲学观点+事例+分析推理得出结论)

●详例与概例

▲看看下列两个语段，看看它们在证明语段论点时用例有何不同。

【例1】在曲径中转身，也许能创造奇迹。//当你在曲径中跌跌撞撞，头破血流甚至奄奄一息的时候，不要放弃，只要稍事休息，来个华丽的转身，即可东山再起。//拿破仑在被反法同盟军打败后，被流放在大西洋的一个孤岛上，但他并没有因此而绝望，他重返法国，建立“百日王朝”，创造了一个神话，一个前无古人后无来者的奇迹。尽管滑铁卢之战他再次失败了，但他的这次转身却在历史上写下了厚重的一笔。//所以，即使在艰难困苦中也不要放弃，即使山重水复，只要你肯转身，相信前面定会是“柳暗花明又一村”。(以“转身”为话题的作文片段)

【例2】自卑像根受潮的火柴，难以将希望之火点燃;自负像个可怕的陷阱，一旦身陷其中即难以自拔;唯有自信自强，才能扬起生活的风帆。//我国宋朝的文豪苏洵，几次赶考都名落孙山，一些人更是对他冷嘲热讽，但他没有灰心，而是闭门苦读，终于因散文有极高的造诣而名列唐宋八大家;举世闻名的音乐家贝多芬，30岁就耳聋，他没有屈服于命运的安排，在听不见声音的情况下，创造了大量优秀作品，并谱写出时代的最强音“扼住生命的咽喉”;居里夫人，这位伟大的科学家，作为镭的发现者，荣获诺贝尔化学奖，耀眼荣誉没有使她陶醉，他仍如从前一样孜孜不倦的工作，使它成为获得这一殊荣的唯一女性。//这些伟人之所以能够取得成功，是因为他们在挫折面前毫不自卑，在成就面前毫不自负，始终有自强不息的精神。(考场优秀作文《自卑?自负?自强》)

【分析】证明语段论点时，例1在举例论证时仅用了一个事例，而且较详细，我们称之为“详例”;例2在举例论证时则用了三个事例，叙述简约，而且句式上排比，我们称之为“概例”。

▲▲1以详例证明观点

所谓详例，即用典型的具体的事例作论据来证明语段论点，叙例文字较多，即通常所说的“摆事实”“例证法”。由于这种方法是以个别事实作为前提证明一个观点的，因此，选例要有较强的说服力，列举的事实必须注意应该真实、典型。详例看似简单，但最易出问题，我们看以下病例：

【例3】欧洲有位化学家，在一次实验中，发现一种新物质，可是他没有把这种新物质提炼出来，就放弃了这个实验。后来另一位化学家也做了这样的实验，由于他坚持不懈，另一种新元素终于被他发现了。

【分析】事例语焉不详，甚至虚假。提到的两位化学家，没有写出他们的姓名，做什么实验，发现一种什么新物质，模糊不清，因此降低了论据的说服力。

【例4】法国的托尔斯泰为写《战争与和平》深入采访，光笔记就写了40万字，最后终于用60年的时间完成了这部巨著。

【分析】事例不准确，出现硬伤。托尔斯泰是俄国作家，哪个不知道?“用了60年时间完成了这部巨著”，与事实不符。事实上，托尔斯泰写《战争与和平》，一共用了7年时间。论据不真实，失去可信度，同样就没有说服力了。

【例5】做事必须要有恒心。唐代大诗人白居易在诗坛上颇负盛名，但他从不满足，从不松懈，经常深入民间把自己的新诗念给村妇老农们听，问他们听懂听不懂，虚心征求他们的意见，并加以修改。所以他的诗通俗易懂，深受广大人民喜爱。

【分析】事例与观点若即若离，打擦边球。用这个事例论证“做事要有恒心”显然是不妥的，虽然其中也有“不松懈”、“经常”等字样，却不能用来论证“有恒”。如果用它来论证“作家应该有严谨的创作态度”则是很切题的。

【例6】“有志者事竟成”的例子实在不胜枚举。西汉历史学家司马迁，年轻时遵父命写史书，遍访天下古迹，花费二十年进行资料搜寻蓄备。正当他潜心著书时，一场灾难降临了他的头上。因为他为李陵辩护而惹怒了汉武帝，被捕下狱，遭受宫刑。这一打击使他痛不欲生，几欲绝命于世。正是著写史书的大志支撑着他，使他忍辱苟活，终于完成了历史巨著《史记》。

(用例冗长，以叙代议。这是初学议论文的同学最易犯的毛病。司马迁的事迹众所周知，无须详细介绍。这样不仅拉长篇幅，成为赘语，而且冲淡了论点。)

使用第一人称而不用无人称句子

Wrong: "The operational goals of this organization include an increase in morale as well as overall job satisfaction."

错误示例：这个组织的运作目标包括鼓舞士气和提高工作满意度。

Right: "I want to enjoy working here. Ill bet you do, too."

正确示例：我想要享受在这儿工作。我相信你也是。

使用生动的语言而不是陈词滥调

Wrong: "This action item calls for out-of-the-box thinking."

错误示例：这项任务要求大胆开阔的想法。

Right: "If youve got an idea that youre afraid might be half-baked, lets consider it anyway."

正确示例：如果你有一个想法，那你担心会中途流产，没关系先考虑再说。

不要重复自己说的话

Wrong: "This training program teaches you to learn the best tricks, tips, techniques and skills for every stage of the market process."

错误示例：这个培训项目能教会你营销过程中最好的手段、方法、技巧和技能。

Right: "This program teaches the best marketing tricks."

正确示例：这个项目能教会你最好的营销手段。

用名词和动词而不是形容词和副词

Wrong: "We have an exciting, brand new product that will easily and quickly solve your most difficult sales process problems."

错误示例：我们推出了一款令人振奋的、全新的产品，它能够轻易解决我们面临的最难的销售问题。

Right: " This product will help you turn prospects into customers in less time."

正确示例：这款产品能够帮助你在较短时间内开拓新用户。

展示证据而不是观点

Wrong: "We have the best service, the most reliable product and the friendliest salespeople."

错误示例：我们有最好的服务，最值得信赖的产品和最友善的销售人员。

Right: "We won the XYZ best service award. Twice."

正确示例：我们赢得了XYZ最佳服务奖两次。

下面的材料旨在丰富学生在是非问题写作方面的思想和语言，考生在复习时可以先分类阅读这些篇章，然后尝试写相关方面的作文题。

对于素材中用黑体字的部分，特别建议你熟读，背诵，因为它们在语言和观点上都值得吸收。学习语言的人应该明白，表达能力和思想深度都靠日积月累，潜移默化。从某种意义上说，提高英语写作能力无捷径可走，你必须大段背诵英语文章才能逐渐形成语感和用英语进行表达的能力。这一关，没有任何人能代替你过。

因此，建议你下点苦功夫，把背单词的精神拿出来背诵文章。何况，并不是要求你背了之后永远牢记在心：你可以这个星期背，下个星期忘。这没有关系，相信你的大脑具有神奇的能力。背了工具箱里的文章后，你会惊讶的发现：I can think in English now！

1.?????? Proverbs

1. A graduation ceremony is an event where the commencement speaker tells thousands of students dressed in identical caps and gowns that individuality is the key to success.

2. The primary purpose of a liberal education is to make one’s mind a pleasant place in which to spend one’s time.

3. Next in importance to freedom and justice is popular education, without which neither freedom nor justice can be permanently maintained.

4. The classroom--not the trench--is the frontier of freedom now and forevermore.

5. Education’s purpose is to replace an empty mind with an open one.

6. It is the purpose of education to help us become autonomous, creative, inquiring people who have the will and intelligence to create our own destiny.

7. You see, real ongoing, lifelong education doesn’t answer questions; it provokes them.

8. People will pay more to be entertained than educated.

9.the most important function of education at any level is to develop the personality of the individual and the significance of his life to himself and to others. This is the basic architecture of a life; the rest is ornamentation and decoration of the structure.

10. The essence of our efforts to see that every child has a chance must be to assure each as equal opportunity, not to become equal, but to become different-to realize whatever unique potential of body, mind, and spirit he or she possesses.

11. A great teacher never strives to explain his vision-he simply invites you to stand beside him and see for yourself.

12. If you can read and don’, you are an illiterate by choice.

2. Damaging Research

A study by National Parent-Teacher Organization revealed that in the average American school, eighteen negatives are identified for every positive that is pointed out. The Wisconsin study revealed that when children enter the first grade, 80 percent of them feel pretty good themselves, but by the time they get to the sixth grade, only 10 percent of them have good self-images.

3. Education and Citizenship

An important aspect of education in the United States is the relationship between education and citizenship. Throughout its history this nation has emphasized public education as a means of transmitting democratic values, creating equality of opportunity, and preparing new generations of citizens to function in society. In addition, the schools have been expected to help shape society itself. During the 1950s, for example, efforts to combat racial segregation focused on the schools. Later, when the Soviet Union launched the first orbiting satellite, American schools and colleges came under intense pressure and were offered many incentives to improve their science and mathematics programs so that the nations would not fall behind the Soviet Union in scientific and technological capabilities.

Education is often viewed as a tool for solving social problems, especially social inequality. The schools, t is thought, can transform young people from vastly different backgrounds into competent, upwardly mobile adults. Yet these goals seem almost impossible to attain. In recent years, in fact, public education has been at the center of numerous controversies arising from the gap between the ideal and the reality. Part of the problem is that different groups in society have different have different expectations. Some feel that children should be taught basic job-related skills; still others believe education should not only prepare children to compete in society but also help them maintain their cultural identity (and, in the case of Hispanic children, their language). On the other hand, policymakers concerned with education emphasize the need to increase the level of student achievement and to improve parents in their children’s education.

Some reformers and critics have called attention to the need to link formal schooling with programs designed to address social problems. Sociologist Charles Moscos, for example, is a leader in the movement to expand programs like the Peace Corps, Vista, and Outward Bound into a system of voluntary national service. National service, as Moscos defines it, would entail “the full-time undertaking of public duties by young people whether as citizen soldiers or civilian servers-who are paid subsistence wages” and serve for at least one year. In return for this period of service, the volunteers would receive assistance in paying for college or other educational expenses.

Advocates of national service and school-to-work programs believe that education does not have to be confined to formal schooling. In devising strategies to provide opportunities for young people to serve their society, they emphasize the educational value of citizenship experiences gained outside the classroom. At this writing there is little indication that national service will become a new educational institution in the United States, although the concept is steadily gaining support among educators and social critics.

4. The Teacher’s Role

Given the undeniable importance of classroom experience, sociologists have done a considerable amount of research on what goes on in the classroom. Often they start from the premise that, along with the influence of peers, students’ experiences in the classroom are of central importance to their later development. One study examined the impact of a single first-grade teacher on her students’ subsequent adult status. The surprising results of this study have important implications. It is evident that good teachers can make a big difference in children’s lives, a fact that gives increased urgency to the need to improve the quality of primary-school teaching. The reforms carried out by educational leaders like James Comer suggest that when good teaching is combined with high levels of parental involvement the results can be even more dramatic.

Because the role of the teacher is to change the learner in some way, the teacher-student relationship is an important part of education. Sociologists have pointed out that this relationship is asymmetrical or unbalanced, with the teacher being in a position of authority and the student having little choice but to passively absorb the information provided by the teacher. In other words, in conventional classrooms there is little opportunity for the students to become actively involved in the learning process. On the other hand, students often develop strategies for undercutting the teacher’s authority: mentally withdrawing, interrupting, and the like. Hence, much current research assumes that students and teachers influence each other instead of assuming that the influence is always in a single direction.

5. Education Philosophy

For the past fifty years our schools have operated on the theories of John Dewey (1859-1953), an American educator and writer. Dewey believed hat the school’s job was to enhance the natural development of the growing child, rather than to pour information, for which the child had no context, into him or her. In the Dewey system, the child becomes the active agent in his own education, rather than a passive receptacle for facts.

Consequently, American schools are very enthusiastic about teaching “life skills” –logical thinking, analysis, creative problem--solving. The actual content of the lessons is secondary to the process, which is supposed to train the child to be able to handle whatever life may present, including all the unknowns of the future. Students and teachers both regard pure memorization as an uncreative and somewhat vulgar.

In addition to “life skills”, schools are assigned to solve the ever growing stoke of social problems. Racism, teenage pregnancy, alcoholism, drug use, reckless driving, and are just a few of the modern problems that have appeared on the school curriculum.

This all contributes to a high degree of social awareness in American youngsters.

6. Student Life

To the students, the most notable difference between elementary school and the higher levels is that in junior high they start “changing classes”. This means that rather than spending the day in one classroom, they switch classrooms to meet their different teachers. This gives them three or four minutes between classes in the hallways, where a great deal of the important social action of high school traditionally takes place. Students have lockers in these hallways, around which thy congregate.

Society in general does not take the business of studying very seriously. Schoolchildren have a great deal of free time, which they are encouraged to fill with extracurricular activities—sports, clubs, cheerleading, scouts—supposed to inculcate such qualities as leadership, sportsmanship, ability to organize, etc. those who don’t become engaged in such activities or have afterschool jobs have plenty of opportunity to “hang out”, listen to teenager music, and watch television.

Compared to other nations, American students do not have much homework. Studies also show that American parents have lower expectations for their children’s success in school than other nationalities do. (Historically, there has not been much correlation between American school success and success in later life.) “He’s just not a scholar”, the American parents might say, content that their son is on the swim team and doesn’t take drugs. (Some of the young do choose to study hard, for reason of their own, such as determining that the road to riches lies through Harvard Business School.)

What American schools do effectively teach is the competitive method. In innumerable ways children are pitted against each other—whether in classroom discussion, spelling bees, reading groups, or tests. Every classroom is expected to produce a scattering of A’s and F’s (teachers often grade A=excellent; B=good; C=average; D=poor; and F=failed). A teacher who gives all A’s looks too soft—so students are aware that they are competing for the limited number of top marks.

Foreign students sometimes don’t understand that copying from other people’s papers or from books is considered wrong and taken seriously. Here, it is important to show that you have done your own work and are displaying your own knowledge. It is more important than helping your friends to pass, whom we think do not deserve to pass unless they can provide their own answers. Group effort goes against the competitive grain, and American students do not study together as many Asians do. Many Asians in this country consider their group study habits a large contributor to their school success.

7. Adult Education

After complaining about many aspects of American life, a 40-year-old woman from Hong Kong concluded, “But where else could someone my age go back to school and get a degree in social work? Here you can change your whole life, start a new business, do what you really want to do.”

So at least to this person, school requirements weren’t inhibiting. And to millions of others, adult education is the path to a new career, or if not to a new career, to a new outlook. Schools generally encourage the older person who wants to start anew, and besides regular classes, schedule evening classes in special programs. Today there are so many people of retirement age in college that it is no longer remarkable.

8. Moral Relativism in American

Improving American education requires not doing new things but doing (and remembering) some good old things. At the time of our nation’s founding, Thomas Jefferson listed the requirements for a sound education in the Report of the Commissioners for the University of Virginia. In this landmark statement on American education, Jefferson wrote of the importance of education and writing, and of reading history, and geography. But he also emphasized the need “to instruct the mass of our citizens in these, their rights, interests, and duties, as men and citizens.” Jefferson believed education should aim at the improvement of both one’s “morals” and “faculties”. That has been the dominant view of the aims of American education for over two centuries. But a number of changes, most of them unsound, have diverted schools from these great pursuits. And the story of the loss of the school’s original moral mission explains a great deal.

Starting in the early seventies, “values clarification” programs started turning up in schools all over America. According to this philosophy, the schools were not to take part in their time-honored task of transmitting sound moral values; rather, they were to allow the child to “clarify” his own values (which adults, including parents, had no “rights” to criticize). The “values clarification” movement didn’t clarify values; it clarified wants and desires. This form of moral relativism said, in effect, that no set of values was right or wrong; everybody had an equal right to his own values; and all values were subjective, relative, and personal. This destructive view took hold with a vengeance.

In 1985 The York Times published an article quoting New York area educators, in slavish devotion to this new view, proclaiming, “They deliberately avoid trying to tell students what is ethically right and wrong.” The article told of one counseling session involving fifteen high school juniors and seniors. In the course of that session a student concluded that a fellow student had been foolish to return one thousand dollars she found in a purse at school. According to the article, when the youngsters asked the counselor’s opinion, “He told them he believed the girl had done the right thing, but that, of course, he would not try to force his values on them. ‘If I come from the position of what is wrong,’ he explained, ‘then I’m not their counselor.’”

Once upon a time, a counselor offered counselor, and he knew that an adult does not form character in the young by taking a stance of neutrality toward questions of right and wrong or by merely offering “choices” or “options”.

In response to the belief that adults and educators should teach children sound morals, one can expect from some quarters indignant objections (I’ve heard one version of it expressed countless times over the years): “Who are you to say what’s important?” or “Whose standards and judgments do we use?”

The correct response, it seems to me, is, is we ready to do away with standards and judgments? Is anyone going to argue seriously that a life of cheating and swindling is as worthy as a life of honest, hard work? Is anyone (with the exception of some literature professors at our elite universities) going to argue seriously the intellectual corollary, that a Marvel comic book is as good as Macbeth? Unless we are willing to embrace some pretty silly position, we’ve got to admit the need for moral and intellectual standards. The problem is that some people tend to regard anyone who would pronounce a definitive judgment as an unsophisticated Philistine or a closed-minded “elitist” trying to impose his view on everybody else.

The truth of the real world is that without standards and judgments, there can be no progress. Unless we are prepared to say irrational things—that nothing can be proven more valuable than anything else or that everything is equally worthless—we must ask the normative question. It may come, as a surprise to those who fell that to be “progressive” is to be value-neutral. But as Matthew Amold said, “the world is forwarded by having its attention fixed on the best things” and if the world can’t decide what the best things are, at least to some degree, then it follows that progress, and character, is in trouble. We shouldn’t be reluctant to declare that some things, some lives, books, ideas, and values are better than others. It is the responsibility of the schools to teach these better things.

At one time, we weren’t so reluctant to teach them. In the mid-nineteenth century, a diverse, widespread group of crusaders began to work for the public support of what was then called the “common school”, the forerunner of the public school. They were to be charged with the mission of school felt that the nation could fulfill its destiny only if every new generation was taught these values together in a common institution.

The leaders of the common school movement were mainly citizens who were prominent in their communities—businessmen, ministers, local civic and government officials. These people saw the schools as upholders of standards of individual morality and small incubators of civic and personal virtue; the founders of the public schools had faith that public education could teach good moral and civic character from a common ground of American values.

But in the past quarter century or so, some of the so-called experts became experts of value neutrality, and moral education was increasingly left in their hands. The commonsense view of parents and the publicthat schools should reinforce rather than undermine the values of home, family, and country, was increasingly rejected.

There are those today still that claim we are now too diverse a nation, that we consist of too many competing convictions and interests to instill common values. They are wrong. Of course we are a diverse people. We have always been a diverse people. And as Madison wrote in FederalistNo.10, the competing, balancing interests of a diverse people can help ensure the survival of liberty. But there are values that all American citizens share and that we should want all American students to know and to make their own: honesty, fairness, self-discipline, fidelity to task, friends, and family, personal responsibility, love of country, and belief in the principles of liberty, equality, and the freedom to practice one’s faith. The explicit teaching of these values is the legacy of the common schools, and it is a legacy to which we must return.

9. Schools Should Teach Values

People often said, “Yes, we should teach these values, but how do we teach them?” this question deserves a candid response, one that isn’t given often enough. It is by exposing our children to good character and inviting its imitation that we will transmit to them a moral foundation. This happens when teachers and principals, by their words and actions, embody sound convictions. As Oxford’s Mary Warnock has written, “You cannot teach morality without being committed to morality yourself; and you cannot be committed to morality yourself without holding that some things are right and others wrong.” The theologian Martin Buber wrote that the educator is distinguished from all other influences “by his will to take part in the stamping of character and by his consciousness that he represents in the eyes of the growing person a certain selection of what is, the selection of what is ‘right’, of what should be.” It is in this will, Buber says, in this clear standing for something, that the “vocation as an educator finds its fundamental expression.”

There is no escaping the fact that young people need as example principals and teachers who know the difference between right and wrong, good and bad, and who themselves exemplify high moral purpose.

As Education Secretary, I visited a class at Waterbury Elementary School in Waterbury, Vermont, and asked the students, “Is this a good school?” They answered, “Yes, this is a good school.” I asked them, “Why?” Among other things, one eight-year-old said, “The principal Mr. Riegel, makes good rules and everybody obeys them.” So I said, “Give me an example.” And another answered, “You can’t climb on the pipes in the bathroom. We don’t climb on the pipes and the principal doesn’t either.”

This example is probably too simple to please a lot of people who want to make the topic of moral education difficult, but there is something profound in the answer of those children, something education should pay more attention to. You can’t expect children to take messages about rules or morality seriously unless they see adults taking those rules seriously in their day-to-day affairs. Certain must be said, certain limits lay down, and certain examples set. There is no other way.

We should also do a better job at curriculum selection. The research shows that most “values education” exercises and separate courses in “moral reasoning” tend not to affect children’s behavior; if anything, they may leave children morally adrift. Where to turn? I believe our literature and our history are a rich quarry of moral literacy. We should mine that quarry. Children should have at their disposal a stock of examples illustrating what we believe to be right and wrong, good and bad—examples illustrating what are morally right and wrong can indeed be known and that there is a difference.

What kind of stories, historical events, and famous lives am I talking about? If we want our children to know about honesty, we should teach them about Abe Lincoln walking three miles to return six cents and conversely, about Aesop’s shepherd boy who cried wolf if we want them to know about courage, we should teach them about Joan of Arc, Horatius at the bridge, and Harriet Tubman and the Underground Railroad. If we want them to know about persistence in the face of adversity, they should know about the voyages of Columbus and the character of Washington during the Civil War. And our youngest should be told about the Little Engine That Could. If we want them to know about respect for the law, they should understand why Socrates told Crito: “No, I must submit to the decree of Athens.” If we want our children to respect the rights of others, they should read the Declaration of Independence, the Bill of Rights, the Gettysburg Address, and Martin Luther King, Jr.’ “Letter from Birmingham jail.” From the Bible they should know about Ruth’s loyalty to Naomi, Joseph’s forgiveness of his brothers, Jonathan’s friendship with David, the Good Samaritan’s kindness toward a stranger, and David’s cleverness and courage in facing Goliath.

These are only a few of the hundreds of examples we can call on. And we need not get into issues like nuclear war, abortion, creationism, or euthanasia. This may come as a disappointment to some people, but the fact is that the formation of character in young people is educationally a task different from, and prior to, the discussion of the great, difficult controversies of the day. First things come first. We should teach values the same way we teach other things: one step at a time. We should not use the fact that there are many difficult and controversial moral questions as an argument against basic instruction in the subject.

After all, we do not argue against teaching physics because laser physics is difficult, against teaching American history because there are heated disputes about the Founders’ intent. Every field has its complexities and its controversies. And every field has its basics, its fundamentals. So they are too with forming character and achieving moral literacy. As any parent knows, teaching character is a difficult task. But it is a crucial task, because we want our children to be healthy, happy, and successful but decent, strong, and good. None of this happens automatically; there is no genetic transmission of virtue. It takes the conscious, committed efforts of adults. It takes careful attention.

10. College Pressures

Mainly I try to remind that the road ahead is a long one and that it will have more unexpected turns than they think. There will be plenty of time to change jobs, change careers, change whole attitudes and approaches. They don not want to hear such liberating news. They want a map—right now – that they can follow unswervingly to career security, financial security, Social Security and, presumably, a prepaid grave.

What I wish for all students is some release from the clammy grip of the future. I wish them a chance to savor each segment of their education as an experience in itself and not as a grim preparation for the next step. I wish them the right to experiment, to trip and fall, to learn that defeat is as instructive as victory and is not the end of the world.

My wish, of course, is na?ve. One of the national gods venerated in our media—the million-dollar athlete, the wealthy executive—and glorified in our praise of possessions. In the presence of such a potent state religion, the young are growing up old.

I see four kinds of pressure working on college students today: economic pressure, parental pressure, peer pressure, and self-induced pressure. It is easy to look around for villains—to blame the colleges for charging too much money, the professors for assigning too much work, the parents for pushing their children too far, and the students for driving themselves too hard. But there are no villains: only victims.

“In the late 1960s.” one dean told me. “The typical question that I got from students was ‘Why is there so much suffering in the world’ or ‘how I can make a contribution?’ Today it’s ‘Do you think it would look better for getting into law school if I did a double major in history and political science, or just majored in one of them?’” many other deans confirmed this pattern. One said: “They are trying to find an edge—the intangible something that will look better on paper if two students are about equal.”

Note the emphasis on looking better. The transcript has become a sacred document, the passport to security. How one appears on paper is more important than how one appears in person. A is for Admirable and B is for Borderline, even though, in Yale’s official system of grading, A means “excellent” and B means “very good.” Today, looking very good is no longer good enough, especially for students who hope to go on to law school or medical school. They know that entrance into the better schools will be an entrance into the better law firms and better medical practices where they will make a lot of money. They also know that the odds are harsh. Yale Law School, for instance, matriculates 170students from an applicant pool of 3,700; Harvard enrolls 550 from a pool of 7,000.

It’s all very well for those of us who write letters of recommendation for our students to stress the qualities of humanity that will make them good lawyers or doctors. And it’s nice to think that admission officers are ready reading our letters and looking for the extra dimension of commitment or concern. Still, it would be hard for a student not to visualize these officers shuffling so many transcripts studded with As that they regard a B as positively shameful.

The pressure is almost as heavy on students who just want to graduate and get a job. Long gone are the days of the “gentleman’s C.” when students journeyed through college with a certain relaxation, sampling a wide variety of courses-music, art, philosophy, classics, anthropology, poetry, religion—that would send them out as liberally educated men and women. If I were an employer I would rather employ graduates who have this range and curiosity than those who narrowly pursued safe subjects and high grades. I know countless students whose inquiring minds exhilarate me. I like to hear the play of their ideas. I do not know if they are getting As or Cs, and I do not care. I also like them as people. The country needs them, and they will find satisfying jobs. I tell them to relax. They cannot.

Nor can I blame them. They live in a brutal economy. Tuition, room, and board at most private colleges now come to at least $7,000, not counting books and fees. This might seem to suggest that the colleges are getting rich. But they are equally battered by inflation. Tuition covers only 60 percent of what it costs to educate a student, and ordinarily the remainder comes from what college receives in endowments, grants, and gifts. Now, the remainder keeps being swallowed by the cruel costs—higher every year—of just opening the doors. Heating oil is up. Insurance is up. Postage is up. Health-premium costs are up. Everything is up. Deficits are up. We are witnessing in American the creation of a brotherhood of paupers—colleges, parents, and students, joined by the common bond of debt.

Today it is not unusual for a student, even if he works part time at college and full time during the summer, to accrue $5,000 in loans after four years—loans that he must start to repay within one year after graduation. Exhorted at commencement to go forth into the world, he is already behind as he goes forth. How could he not feel under pressure throughout college to prepare for this day of reckoning? I have used “he,” incidentally, only for brevity. Women at Yale are under no less pressure to justify their expensive education to themselves, their parents, and society. In fact, they are probably under more pressure. For although they leave college superbly equipped to bring fresh leadership to traditionally male jobs, society has not yet caught up with this fact.

Along with economic pressure goes parental pressure. Inevitably, the two are deeply intertwined.

I see many students taking pre-medical courses with joyless tenacity. They go off to their labs as if they were going to the dentist. It saddens me because I know tem in other corners of their life as cheerful people.

“Do you want to medical school?” I asked them.

“I guess so,” they say, without conviction, or “Not really.”

“Then why are you going?”

“Well, my parents want me to be a doctor. They are paying all this money and …”

Poor students, poor parents, they are caught in one of the oldest webs of love and duty and guilt. The parents mean will; they are trying to steer their sons and draughts toward a secure future. But the sons and daughter want to major in history or classics or philosophy—subjects with no “practical” value. Where’s the payoff on the humanities? It’s not easy to persuade such loving parents that the humanities do indeed pay off. The intellectual faculties developed by studying subjects like history and classics—an ability to synthesize and relate, to weigh cause and effect, to see events in perspective—are just the faculties that make creative leaders in business or almost any general field. Still, many fathers would rather put their money on courses that point toward specific profession—courses that are pre-law, pre-medical, pre-business, or, as I sometimes heard it put, “pre-rich.”

But the pressure on students is severe. They are truly torn. One part of them feels obliged to fulfill their parents’ expectations; after all, their parents are older and presumably wiser. Another part tells them that the expectations that are right for their parents are not right for them.

I know a student who wants to be an artist. She is very obviously an artist and will be a good one—she has already had several modest local exhibits. Meanwhile she is growing as a well-round person and taking humanistic subjects that will enrich the inner resources out of which her art will grow. But her father is strongly opposed. He thinks that an artist is a “dumb” thing to be. The student vacillates and tries to please everybody. She keeps up with her art somewhat furtively and takes some of the “dumb” courses her father wants her to take—at least they are dumb courses for her. She is a free spirit on a campus of tense students—no small achievement in it—and she deserves to follow her muse.

Peer pressure and self-induced pressure are also intertwined, and they begin almost at the beginning of freshman year.

“I had a freshman student I’ll call Linda,” one dean told me, “who came in and said she was under terrible pressure because her roommate, Barbara, was much brighter and studied all the time. I could not tell her that Barbara had come in two hours earlier to say the same thing about Linda.”

The story is almost funny—except that it is not. It is symptomatic of all the pressure put together. When every student thinks every other student is working harder and doing better, the only solution is to study harder still. I see students going off to the library every night after dinner and coming back when it closes at midnight. I wish they would sometimes forget about their peers and go to a movie. I hear the clacking of typewriters in the hours before dawn. I see the tension in their eyes when exams are approaching and papers are due: “Will I get everything done?”

Probably they won’t. They will get blocked. They will sleep. They will oversleep. They will bug out.

Part of the problem is that they are expected to do. A professor will assign five page papers. Several students will start writing ten page papers to impress him. Then more students will write ten page papers, and a few will raise the ante to fifteen. Pity the poor student who is still just doing the assignment.

“Once you have twenty or thirty percent of the student population deliberately overexerting,” one dean points out, “It’s bad for everybody. When a teacher gets more and more effort from his class, the student who is doing normal work can be perceived as not doing well. The tactic work, psychologically.”

Why cannot the professor just cut back and not accept longer papers? He can, and he probably will. But by then the term will be half over and the damage done. Grade fever is highly contagious and not easily reversed. Besides, the professor’s main concern is with his course. He knows his students only in relation to the course and does not know that they are also overexerting in their other courses. Nor is it really his business. He did not sign up for dealing with the student as a whole person and with all the emotional baggage the student brought along from home. That’s what deans, masters, chaplains, and psychiatrists are for.

To some extent this is nothing new: a certain number of professors have always been self-contained islands of scholarship and shyness, more comfortable with books than with people. But the new pauperism has widened the gap still further, for professors who actually like to spend time with students do not have as much time to spend. They are also overexerting. If they are young, they are busy trying to publish in order not to perish, hanging by their figure nails onto a shrinking profession.

If they are old and tenured, they are buried under the duties of administering departments—as departmental chairmen or members of committees—that have been thinned out by the budgetary axe.

Ultimately it will be the students’ own business to break the circles in which they are trapped. They are too young to be prisoners of their parents’ dreams and their classmates’ fears. They must be jolted into believing into themselves as unique men and women who have the power to shape their own future.

“Violence is being done to the undergraduate experience,” says Carlos Hortas. “College should be open-ended: at the end it should open many, many roads. Instead, students are choosing their goal in advance, and their choices narrow as they go along. It’s almost as if they think that the country has been codified in the type of jobs that exist-that they’ve got to fit into certain slots. Therefore, fit into the best paying slot.”

“They ought to take chances. Not taking chances will lead to life of colorless mediocrity. They’ll be comfortable. But something in the spirit will be missing.”

I have painted too drab a portrait of today’s students, making them seem a solemn lot. That is only half of their story; if they were so dreary I wouldn’t so thoroughly enjoy their company. The other half is that they are easy to like. They are quick to laugh and to offer friendship. They are not introverts. They are usually kind and are more considerate of one another than any student generation I have known.

Nor are they so obsessed with their studies that they avoid sports and extracurricular activities. On the contrary, they juggle their crowded hours to play on a variety of teams, perform with musical and dramatic groups, and write for campus publications. But this in turn is one more cause of anxiety. There are too many choices. Academically, they have 1,300 courses to select from; outside class they have to decide how much spare time they can spare and how to spend it.

This means that they engage in fewer extracurricular pursuits than their predecessors did. If they want to row on the crew and play in the symphony they will eliminate one; in the ‘60s they would have done both. They also tend to choose activities that are self-limiting. Drama, for instance, is flourishing in all twelve of Yale’s residential colleges, as it never has before. Students hurl themselves into these productions—as actors, directors, carpenters, and technicians—with a dedication to create the best possible play, knowing that the day will come when the run will end and they can get back to their studies.

They also cannot afford to be the willing slave of organizations like the Yale Daily News. Last spring at the one-hundredth anniversary banquet of that paper—who’s past chairmen include such once and future kings as Potter Stewart, Kingman Brewster, and William F. Buckley, Jr.—much was made of the fact that the editorial staff used to be small and totally committed and that “newsies” routinely worked fifty hours a week. In effect they belonged to a club; Newsies is how they defined themselves at Yale. Today’s students will one or two articles a week, when he can, and he defines himself as a student. I’ve never heard the word Newsie except at the banquet.

If I have described the modern undergraduate primarily as a driven creature who is largely ignoring the blithe spirit inside who keeps trying to come out and play, it’s because that’s where the crunch is, not only at Yale but throughout American education. It’s why I think we should all be worried about the values that are nurturing a generation so fearful of risk and so goal-obsessed at such an early age.

I tell students that there is no one “right” way to get ahead—that each of them is a different person, starting from a different point and bound for a different destination. I tell neither them that change is a tonic and that all the slots are not codified nor the frontiers closed. One of my ways of telling them is to invite men and women who have achieved success outside the academic world to come and talk informally with my students during the year. They are heads of companies or ad agencies, editors of magazines, politicians, public officials, television magnates, labor leaders, business executives, Broadway products, artists, writers, economists, photographers, scientists, historians—a mixed bag of achievers.

I asked them to say a few words about how they got started. The students assume that they started in their present profession and knew all along that it was what they wanted to do. Luckily for me, most of them got into their field by a circuitous route, to their surprise, after many detours. The students are startled. They can hardly conceive of a career that was not pre-planned. They can hardly imagine allowing the hand of God or chance to nudge them down some unforeseen trail.

11. To Err Is Wrong

In the summer of 1979, Boston Red Sox first baseman Carl Yastrzemski became the fifteenth player in baseball history to reach the three thousand hit plateaus. This event drew a lot of media attention, and for about a week prior to the attainment of this goal, hundreds of reports covered Yaz’s every more. Finally, one reporter asked, “Hey Yaz, aren’t you afraid all of this attention will go to your head?” Yastrzemski replied, “I look at this way: in my career I’ve been up to bat over ten thousand times. That means I’ve been unsuccessful at the plate over seven thousand times. That fact alone keeps me from getting a swollen head.”?

Most people consider success and failure as opposites, but they are actually both products of the same process. As Yaz suggest, an activity that produces a hit may also produce a miss. It is the same with creative thinking; the same energy that generates good creative ideas also produces errors.

Many people, however, are not comfortable with errors. Our educational system, based on “the right answer” belief, cultivates our thinking in another, more conservative way. From an early age, we are taught that right answers are good and incorrect answers are bad. This value is deeply embedded in the incentive system used in most schools:

Right over 90% of the time = “A”

Right over 80% of the time = “B~”

Right over 70% of the time = “C~” Right over 60% of the time = “D~” Less than 60% correct, you fail.

From this we learn to be right as often as possible and to keep our mistakes to a minimum. We learn, in other words, that “to err is wrong.

Playing It Safe

With this kind of attitude, you aren’t going to be taking too many chances. If you learn that failing even a litter penalizes you (e.g., being wrong only 15% of the time garners you only a “B” performance), you learn not to make mistakes. And more important, you learn not to put yourself to situation where you might fall. This leads to conservative thought pattern designed to avoid the stigma our society puts on “failure”.

I have a friend who recently graduated from college with a Master’s degree in Journalism. For the last six month, she has been trying to find a job, but to no avail. I talked with her about situation, and realized that her problem is that she doesn’t know how to fail. She went through eighteen years of schooling to try any approaches where she might fail. She has been conditioned to believe that failure is bad in and of itself, rather than a potential stepping-stone to new ideas.

Look around. How many middle managers, housewives, administrators, teachers, and other people do you see who are to try anything new because of this failure? Most of us have learned not to make mistakes in public. As a result, we remove ourselves from many learning experience except for those occurring in the most private of circumstances.

Different Logic

From a practical point of view, “to err is wrong” makes sense. Our survival in the everyday world requires us to perform thousand of small tasks without failure. Think about it: you wouldn’t last very long if you were to step out in front of traffic or stick your hand a pot of boiling water. In addition, engineers whose bridges collapse, stock brokers who lose money for their clients, and copywriters whose ad campaigns decrease sales won’t keep their jobs very long.

Nevertheless, too great an adherence to the belief “to err is wrong” can greatly undermine your attempts to generate new ideas. If you are more concerned with producing right answers than generating original ideas, you’ll probably make uncritical use of the rules, formulae, and procedures used to obtain these right answers. By doing this, you’ll by-pass the germinal phase of the creative process, and thus spend litter time testing assumptions, challenging the rules, asking what-if questions, or just playing around with the problem. All of these techniques will produce some incorrect answers, but in the germinal phase errors are viewed as a necessary by-product of creative thinking. As Yaz would put it, “if you want the hits, be prepared for the misses.” That’s the way the game of life goes.

Errors as Stepping Stones

Whenever an error pops up, the usual response is “Jeez, another screw up, what went wrong this time?” the creative thinker, on the other hand, will realize the potential value of errors, and perhaps say something like, “Would you look at that! Where can it lead our thinking?” and then he or she will go on to use the error as a stepping stone to a new idea. As a matter of fact, the whole history of discovery is filed with people who used erroneous assumptions and failed ideas as stepping-stones to new ideas. Columbus thought he was finding a shorter route to India. Johannes Kepler stumbled on to the idea of interplanetary gravity because of assumptions that were right for the wrong reasons. And, Thomas Edison knew 1800 ways not to build a light bulb.

The following story about the automotive genius Charles Kettering exemplifies the spirit of working through erroneous assumptions to good ideas. In 1912, when the automobile industry was just beginning to grow, Kettering was interested in improving gasoline engine efficiency. The problem he faced was“knockthe phenomenon in which gasoline takes too long to burn in the cylinder-thereby reducing efficiency.

Kettering began searching for ways to eliminate the “knock.” He thought to him, “How can I get the gasoline to combust in the cylinder at an earlier time?” the key concept here is “early”. Searching for analogous situations, he looked around for models of “things that happen early.” He thought of historical models, physical models, and biological models. Finally, he remembered a particular plant, the trailing arbutus, which “happens early,” i.e., it blooms in the snow (“earlier” than other plants). One of this plant’s chief characteristics is its’ red leaves, which help the plant retain light at certain wavelengths. Kettering figured that it must be the red color, which made the trailing arbutus bloom earlier.

Now came the critical step in Kettering’s chain of thought. He asked himself, “How can I make the gasoline red?” perhaps I’ll put red dye in the gasoline—maybe that’ll make it combust earlier.” He looked around his workshop, and found that he didn’t have any red dye. But he did happen to have some iodine—perhaps that would do. He added the iodine to the gasoline and, lo and behold, the engine didn’t “knock”.

[英语作文写作的需要背诵的部分

半命题作文就是命题时限定题目部分内容，学生根据要求将题目补充完整，然后再进行写作的作文命题形式。其灵活度介于话题作文与命题作文之间，既有所限制又不失开放性，能较为真实地反映学生的写作水平。纵观近年来全国中考，半命题作文作为一种传统的命题形式，越来越受到人们的青睐。在四种常见的作文类型中，半命题作文是最不容忽视的，也应是我们备考练习的重点内容。下面是归纳的几种常见命题形式：

一是前空型。如2014年的“_____是我致胜的魔杖”(广东省)、“____的种子在我心中种下”(广西北海)、“____的岁月”(贵州安顺)、“____刷新着我的生活”(湖北鄂州)等。

二是后空型。如2014年的“因为有____”(甘肃兰州)、“错过____”(广西柳州)、“追寻那渐远的____”(贵州贵阳)等。

三是中空型。这类题型要联系前后内容，确定写作的方向。如2014年“有____ 陪伴的日子”(广西梧州)、“留一份____给你”(江西抚州)、“藏在____里的精彩”(湖北孝感)等。

四是“两空”型。这种命题要运用一定的联想和想象，把空缺之处补充完整。如2014年的“因为____我更_ ___”(湖南永州)、“为____画上____”(重庆)等。

铭仁园高三话题类作文常用短语与句型荟萃(一)----旅游&交通

本话题主要包括：1.旅游；2.描述一次旅程；

针对本话题，高考命题人员可能会从以下角度来命题。

1.描述个人旅游经历 2. 谈旅行中的不文明现象 3 .太空旅游、生态旅游 4.度假方式的变化及其原因5.旅游计划的拟订、准备及注意事项 一、话题常用单词

1. travel/journey/trip/tour n.旅游，旅行 16. a group/organized tour n. 团体游

2. travel agency n. 旅行社 17. a self-driving tripn. 自驾游

3. guiden. 向导，导游 18. destinationn. 目的地

4. flight ticketn. 机票 19. sceneryn. 风景，景色

5. passport n. 护照 20. disadvantage n. 不利条件

6. visan.签证 21. insurancen. 保险

7. identity card(ID) 身份证 22. interesting/ funny/ exciting adj 有趣的

8. tent n. 帐篷 23. enjoyable令人愉快的

9. camp n&vi. 露营 24. memorable 令人难忘的

10. hoteln. 旅馆 25. attractive/fascinatingadj 迷人的

11. necessity n. 必需品 26. boring/dull/tiringadj.无聊的

12. schedule n. 计划表，日程表 27. well-organized adj 组织有序的

13. tourist attractions/places of interest 28. convenient adj 方便的，便利的 /scenic spots/sights旅游景点 29. crowded adj 拥挤的

14. DIY tour n. 自助游 30. severe/seriousadj 严重的 15. space tourism n. 太空旅游

二、话题常用短语

1. go on a wildlife tour/a hiking trip

参加野生动物之旅/去远足

2. be on holiday/a trip to sp 去某地度假/旅行

3. see sb off 送行

4. pay a visit to sp/sb 参观某地/拜访某人

5. show sb around 带领某人参观

6. set out/off 出发，启程

7. check in 登记住宿

8. check out 结账退房

9. have a good time/enjoy oneself/have fun 玩的开心

10. broaden one’s horizon/mind 开拓视野

11. eich one’s knowledge丰富知识

11. experience foreign culture 体验国外的文化

12. join a tour group参加旅游团 三、话题常用句型

1. He who travels far knows much. 远行者见闻多。

2. Travelling can eich our knowledge.旅游可以丰富我们的知识。

3. Travelling enables us to learn a lot that we cannot get from books 旅游可以使我们学到很多在书本上学不到的东西。

4. It’s my pleasure to tell you how to get to the Great Wall. 我很乐意告诉你如何到达长城。

5. Welcome to Sichuan. I feel it an honor to be your guide. 欢迎来到四川。我很荣幸能够担任你的导游。

6. I will keep you company to visit numerous places of interest.我将陪你去参加许多的名胜古迹

7. A visit to Sichuan will be an unforgettable experience. 到四川旅行将会令人难忘。

8. There are many places of interest in Sichuan, such as…四川有很多名胜古迹，比如…

9. Sichuan is rich in tourist attractions and enjoys many world-famous places of interest.

四川有很多景点，并且享有很有世界著名的名胜古迹。

10. However, travelling may cause some problems. 然而，旅行可能会造成一些问题。

11. Great changes have taken place in the ways that people spend their holidays in the past decades. 在近几十年内，人们的度假方式已经发生了巨大的变化。

四、佳作欣赏

nick,将于八月来四川旅游，特来询问，有关旅游景点的情况，请根据，提供的要求写封回信，表示盼望他的到来

要点：1.旅游资源：许多世界著名的风景名胜，如九寨沟（海子：清澈见底，色彩斑斓）；都

江堰水利工程（2000年的历史，仍发挥作用） 2.相关信息： 气侯适宜，交通方便。

Dear Nick,

Im glad to hear that youre coming to Sichuan in August. Youve made the wise choice to travel here. Sichuan Province is rich in tourist attractions and enjoys many world-famous places of interest, such as Jiuzhaigou and Dujiangyan Irrigation Projcet.

Jiuzhaigou is well known for its beautiful lakes, of which the water is clear and looks colorful. It can excite visitors imagination. Another attraction is Dujiangyan Irrigation Project. It was built over 2,000 years ago and is still playing an important part in irrigation today. Besides, the nice weather and convenient transportation here can make your trip more enjoyable. Im sure youll have a good time. Im looking forward to your coming.

假设你是李华，父母答应你今年高三毕业后去美国进行为期10天的观光旅游。请你给美国网友Lucy 写一封电子邮件，咨询以下事情：1. 不随团旅游的食宿、交通等问题。2. 必看景点与时间安排 3. 邀请她到中国观光。

Dear Lucy

How are you doingMy parents have just promised me to make a 10-day tour of America after my graduation from senior high school this summer, which will be a good chance for me to experience American culture and practice my oral English.

As I don’t like to join a tour group, could you please offer me some advice on where to stay, what to eat and how to travel in such a short timeI would appreciate it if you could tell the must-see attractions and the time arrangement. Your advice will surely make my visit enjoyable and worthwhile.

Welcome to China at your convenience. Looking forward to your early reply.

范文二：文明旅游

有些旅游景点的文物景观遭到了严重的破坏，致使最近文明旅游的倡议越来越受重视，因此就“游客可付费在仿造长城上涂写留言”发表看法。

内容包括：(1)谈谈对某些人喜欢在旅游景点随便涂鸦留言的看法;

(2)对专门修一段仿造城墙让游客付高价留言的做法你是赞成还是反对，并简要陈述你的理由。

It is reported that tourists to China’s Great Wall can now leave their mark on a fake(伪造的) wall recently built near the real wall in Badaling if they pay 999 yuan.

In China, many visitors have the hobby of carving graffiti on places of interest, especially on some famous cultural relics. Last year I went to the Great Wall and found many people had left names and ugly words on the Wall, which destroys many historic bricks. In my opinion, such people should feel ashamed of leaving their marks on the great relics which were created by our ancestors.

So personally, I quite agree with this brilliant project though it has caused criticism from some people. The Great Wall would be ruined one day if we didn’t take any steps to protect it. The fake wall is a really good idea because it will protect our relics as well as making profits from the project

应用文是人们日常生活中广泛使用的文体。它最突出的特点是它的实际应用性，应用文包括很广，如书信、通知、日记、海报、便条、启事、请柬、电报、合同等。应用文的语言应使用规范语言，重在实用，力求朴实、准确、简洁。

一、书信

书信我们分为两部分：信封和内容。

1、信封的写法。

英语信封正面的左上角，写发信人的姓名和地址。在信封的正面中央偏左一点，写收信人的地址和姓名。

英语信封上的地点名称由小到大，视其长短可占二至五行不等。

寄信人只写姓名，不写头衔。但是，收信人一般都在名字前加上头衔，以示礼貌和尊敬。对于没有官衔和学衔的人士，通常在姓名前写上Mr., Mrs.,或Ms.。

信封的写法，一般来说，很少出现在中考英语的作文中。

2、内容。

英文信一般可以分为下列几个部分。

1)信端(Heading)即写信人的地址和发信日期。

2)收信人姓名地址

3)称呼

4)信的正文

5)结束语

6)签名

有的时候，出题者会让考生写e-mail。e-mail的写法和书信的写法基本一致。只不过少了书信在信封上的繁琐。

二、发言稿

发言稿要注意以下三点：

1、发言的地点

2、发言的对象

3、发言的内容。

三、通知

通知的正文一般都是写在"Notice"以词之下，一般来说不必写称呼语和结束语。出同时的单位名称可以写在notice之上，也可以写在正文的右下角。

正文一般采用文章式，有时为了醒目，也可采用广告式。广告式要力求简明扼要，一个句子可分几行。每行第一个字母一般要大写。

四、启事

启事是一种公告式的应用文。团体或个人如有什么事情要向大家公开说明或对公众有什么要求，可将要说的话写成启事，张贴在布告栏上或登在报刊上。启事一般无固定格式，要求简明扼要即可。

五、海报

海报是一种带有装饰性的宣传广告。有时配以绘画图案。内容以影讯、展览、演出信息、友谊赛等为主。为了尽可能使更多的人知道，海报往往贴在醒目之处。

在写作文的时候都会有这样的疑问：什么叫“有文采”？作文怎样做到“有文采”？下面是小编整理的高考作文7个写作技巧，欢迎大家阅读！

一、化抽象为形象

请比较下面两个句子：

1．繁忙的工作之后，女孩开始有些想家了。

2．繁忙的工作之后，女孩喜欢一个人爬上顶楼，面对家的方向，去读雁阵、夕阳。（颜文静《寻人启事》）

两句话虽然都表达“女孩想家了”，但前一句只是一般性的交代，“想家”是抽象的、模糊的，而后一句是通过女孩“一个人爬上顶楼，面对家的方向，去读雁阵、夕阳”的意象，蕴蓄思念萦怀、感伤别离的孤独感、凄凉感的，很容易使人想起“乡书何处达？归雁洛阳边”“断送一生憔悴，只消几个黄昏”之类的诗句，所以给人的印象特别深。

二、化静态为动态

莱辛在《拉奥孔》中说，动态之美是一纵即逝却令人百看不厌的美，比一般的美能产生更强烈的效果。正因为如此，对那些静态的事物，我们要善于“化静为动”，使之富有生气，充满活力。例如孔孚的《千佛山龙泉洞某佛前即景》，是这样描写佛像和绿苔的：

他微笑着，看苔爬上脚趾，他微笑着，听苔跃上双膝，他微笑着，任苔侵佛头……

佛本是静态的，就是生长着的苔在我们看到的一刹那也是静止的，作者却用“微笑、看、听”“爬、跃、侵”等动词，使佛和绿苔动态化了，仿佛有了生命似的。山水名胜，多为静物，静则无势，无势则不能动人，所以，要善于让静物动起来，让无生命的东西活起来。

三、绘形绘声绘色

所谓“绘形绘声绘色”，就是把自然界的声响、物体的形状与色彩等具体地描写出来，使人有身临其境的感受。陀斯妥耶夫斯基举过一个例子，他说“有个小银圆落在地上”，这个句子不够好，应该写成“有个小银圆，从桌上滚了下来，在地上丁丁铛铛地跳着”（转引自秦牧《语林采英》）。这样一来，就有声有色了。

四、幽默俏皮活泼

表达过于严肃，不免给人沉重感、压抑感，来一点幽默，讲一点俏皮话，能使文章形象生动，活泼有趣。请看高考满分作文《跟时代一起改变》收尾部分：

我们并不一定要追赶潮流，完全可以做自己；并不需要一味地学着人家的样儿，完全可以做更“高级”的事。

改变自己，使自己有高尚的品行，而不是只知“忙”。

改变自己，使自己有爱国的情操，而不是“爱大米”。

改变自己，使自己有出色的修养，而不是只看搞笑和言情。

改变自己，让自己有鹤立鸡群的素质，如今个性也是潮流，像这种特点，无疑是最“in”的。

周围的一切，正在对我们的成长形成影响，而它们常常是负面甚至颓废的，真是“一点技术含量也没有”。但只要改变自己，我们一样可以拥有过人的气质。否则，“后果很严重”。

作者娴熟地运用杂文笔法，写得亦庄亦谐，轻松自如，使文章具有了特殊的情调，读之令人忍俊不禁。

五、善用修辞手法

根据表达的需要，恰当地运用比喻、拟人、借代、夸张、对偶、排比、设问、反问等修辞方法，可以有效地增强文章的表达效果。请看数例：

1．蜘蛛也惜春归去，网住残红不放飞。

以“残红”代落花，鲜明生动；用拟人手法，生动地表达出惜春之情。

2．水清鱼读月；山静鸟谈天。

用对偶，有音乐之美；用拟人，不仅表现出环境的优美、幽静，而且渲染了一种让人心旷神怡的浓郁的书卷气。

3．那双眼睛，如秋水，如寒星，如宝珠，如白水银里头养着两丸黑水银……（刘鹗《老残游记》）

用博喻刻画白妞的眼睛：“秋水”见其清澈纯净，“寒星”见其晶莹明亮，“宝珠”见其圆润光泽，“水银”见其黑白分明、水灵生动。这双眼睛真是顾盼传情，美丽动人。

4．春听鸟声，夏听蝉声，秋听虫声，冬听雪声；白昼听棋声，月下听箫声，山中听松声，水际听欸乃声，方不虚此生耳。（张潮《幽梦影》）

运用排比，列举一连串悦耳之声，令人浮想联翩，心旌摇荡。

5．少年读书，如隙中窥月；中年读书，如庭中望月，老年读书，如台上玩月。皆以阅历之浅深，为所得之浅深耳。（同上）

以赏月喻读书，表达读书所获与阅历相关的道理，深入浅出。

6．这个地方花朵是太少了，颜色全被女人占去；石头是太少了，坚强全被男人占去；土地是太贫乏了，内容全被枣儿占去；树木是太枯瘦了，丰满全被羊肉占去。（贾平凹《延川城》）

用对比的手法，凸现延川少花少石、土地贫瘠、树木枯瘦和女人美丽、男人坚强、枣大羊肥的特点，造语新奇，让人过目不忘。

7．石墨黑不溜秋，稀松平常，价格低廉；而金刚石光彩熠熠，坚硬无比，价值连城。两者相比，如同鱼鳅与蛟龙，宛若毛虫与彩蝶，好比麻雀与凤凰，犹如地上的癞蛤蟆与碧霄的白天鹅……（《悦纳压力》）

鲜明的对比，生动的比喻，不仅突出了石墨与金刚石之间的天壤之别，而且给人审美的享受。

8．白生生、轻飘飘、软绵绵的棉花糖，在风中颤颤悠悠，好像一片洁白的云要从我手上飞走，我赶紧把它们往怀里靠一靠，拢一拢。我一跑，棉花糖似乎又要飞走，我赶紧把它们团一团，捏一捏……（王珂《甜丝丝的回忆》）

“洁白的云”的比喻形象、贴切，委实引人入胜。

六、注意句式变化

整句和散句、长句和短句灵活搭配，交替使用，语言就会变化多姿，产生特殊的美感。比如2006年浙江卷满分作文《且息且行》中的一段话：

有的人征服了高峰，又举目遥望更险峻的山崖；探得了魂宝，又跃跃于另一次奇异的冒险；策马路过梅园，却一心想着直奔边关，戍国杀敌。

这样的人不是痴顽，而是执著，他们在奔波里冲击生命的极限，在征服里体验生命的快乐，在“无所息”里实现自己的终极意义……最伟大的战士，都渴望战死沙场，在死神带来的永恒憩息面前，他们粲然微笑，死得其所。

这几段文字风格典雅，词语丰富，使用了许多成语、典故；从句式的角度看，以整句为主，兼用散文的章法，注重整散、对称与呼应，形成了一种整散结合的美。

七、引用化用名句

阅读面广、知识面宽、文化底蕴丰厚的同学，在符合题意的前提下不妨多引用、化用名言警句，以尽情展示自己的才华。例如2006年福建卷《月圆是画，月缺是诗》一文中写道：

秋雨先生曾说过，堂皇转眼凋零，喧腾是短命的别名。在流光溢彩的日子里，生命被铸上妖冶的印记。此时此刻，所谓生命的空白，或许就是一种“花开花落两由之”的淡泊心境吧。有哲人云：圣者，常人肯安心者矣。有时候，生命需要隐匿，心灵需要蜇居。在蜇居之中，为未来做准备，就是在蓄势，蓄水以后开了匣放水，便可以灌溉大地。

记得海德格尔曾说过，生命充满了劳绩，但还诗意地栖居于这块土地上。要感谢海德格尔，这位精神的探索者，为我的心里留下了一隅空白。让我在心烦意乱之际，能够冷静地思考，吟上一句“人生天地间，若白驹过隙，忽然而已”；让我在忙碌中，能够偷得浮生半日闲，欣赏一段“他年傍得蟾宫客，不在梅边在柳边”的还魂爱情。如五柳先生，“怀良辰以孤往，或植杖而耘籽”；如东坡先生，“诵明月之诗，歌窈窕之章”；如守着瓦尔登湖的梭罗，如遥望乞力马扎罗之雪的海明威……他们都是诗人，在属于自己的空白天地中，诗意地栖居。

这位考生旁征博引，撷英掇华：从余秋雨的名言，到海德格尔的精神；从鲁迅的诗歌《悼杨铨》，到庄子的语录；从《牡丹亭》中杜丽娘的吟咏，到五柳先生的理想展望，再到东坡先生的赤壁放歌；从守着瓦尔登湖的梭罗，到遥望乞力马扎罗之雪的海明威……其视野之广阔、材料之丰赡、信息之密集、语言之精美，令人叹服。

话题作文的题目大，范围宽，选材有一定的难度，每每让学生难以下手。下面是小编整理的话题作文的写作技巧，欢迎阅读。

1、不要把话题当文章。话题作文的导语提供的是写作范围，并非作文题目。人家的话题是什么，你就以什么为题，否则就有可能出现不应有的失误，出力不讨好。

2、不要以为“文体不限”就是“不要文体”。如果不管文体，信马由缰，文章就会不伦不类。所以一定要选定一种文体，然后按这一文体的有关要求写作。

3、不要摘录导语。不少考生误将导语作为材料作文的“材料”，一开篇就“引”入文中，然后才开始或编述故事，或展开议论，这样的开篇自然也就成为文章的一大败笔。

4、不要泛泛而谈。有些学生“拿”起话题就写，根本没考虑“大题小做”，浮光掠影，泛泛而谈，致使作文中充满了大话、假话、空话、套话，全文找不出明晰的中心。

5、不要游离“话题”。少数同学对“话题”不假思索，写出来的文章根本没有触及话题，甚至与“话题有关的词眼也找不到，完全成了自由作文。因此，写作前一定要读懂“话题”，写作中一定要扣住话题。其实，有的文章只要在恰当的地方点示一下话题，文章就不担心离题了。

导语：英语写作是一种创作性的学习过程。下面是小编收集的小升初英语作文写作技巧，欢迎大家阅读!

英语写作是一种创作性的学习过程。启动知识信息储存，构思立意，谋篇布局，遣词造句，对语言表达的正确性和准确性、思维的逻辑性和文章的条理性都比口语要求更高。通常英语写作有以下几个特点：紧扣教学大纲对考生书面表达的要求;以有指导的写作为主(guidedwriting)，便于考生在短时间内构思成文;突出试题的交际性，考查考生在特定的情景中运用语言的能力;增强试题的实用性，所选话题贴近学生学习生活，为学生所熟悉;看图作文主要考查考生运用所学知识解决实际问题的能力。

英语写作注意两点

一、先审题，弄清写作要求审题是写好作文的前提，也是书面表达的基础。如果写偏了题，语言表达再好也很难得高分。审题时要注意两个方面：

1.认真地看两遍题目，包括提示，全面了解写作要求。

2.理清思路，确定体裁、框架结构和内容。

二、用英语进行思维英语写作时必须排除汉语思维的干扰。

从现在起应逐渐加大阅读量和听的输入量，将阅读、听力训练与书面表达有机地结合起来。经常体会和领悟作者传递信息和表达思想的方式。在话题讨论和写作中经常运用所学到的表达方式就会有所创造。还要尽量做到“五多”：多看、多听、多思考、多用心体验和感悟身边的人和事、多用英语说和写自己的体验和感受。

最后一个月如何训练英语写作

1.重视增加阅读量是提高英语写作的途径之一。

目前，考生在进行大量阅读的同时，应注重所读材料的文章结构以及连接词的运用(ontheotherhand，however，furthermore)、作者的表达方式(词汇、习惯用语和典型句子的使用)、作者是如何进行叙述和议论的。

2.在教师的指导下，平时应勤写多练。

练习写作应从基本功抓起。在中译英翻译训练过程中，加强积累适量的词汇、词组和增加各种类型句子的运用。把握好各种句型和词汇的搭配，并从各类题材和体裁着手，多阅读好的范文。然后模仿写作，作文写好之后，一般都要修改。第一遍收笔后，先看一看结构，然后从字词上推敲，使文章“充实”起来。更重要的是经老师修改过的作文一定要仔细地看一至两遍，然后再认真地抄写一遍，收获将会很大。

英文写作“四步走”

由于时间限制，考试时必须在所限定的时间内完成英语作文。英语作文步骤如下：

1)作文动笔之前一般都要先打腹稿。在确立中心上、运用材料上、篇章结构上，充分酝酿。

2)考虑好想写多少句子，该用哪些动词和词组等。

3)边写边思考内容的连贯性，语言和句子的准确性。

4)写完后一定要再细看一遍。

主要体裁作文写作技巧

(一)写提示议论文应考虑的几点：

1.文章开头，能依据提示确立主题句(topic)阐明观点或看法。

2.会使用连接词分层次说明理由、缘由(supportingsentences)。

3.归纳总结，首尾呼应。

(二)看图作文应考虑的几点：

1.看懂图片，把图片展示的人物、地点、时间、事件等有机地串联起来，使之成为内容连贯的句子。

2.确定短文须用的时态和该用的人称。

3.确定体裁(说明文还是记叙文)，接着用简洁的语句描述图片或图表大意。

4.根据图片或图表大意议论。

第1段150字左右：写出中心论点，首选单句形式，且是判断句或肯定句。绝对不用复句(复句易走题，影响得分)，点出写作的由头，作文题中含有的提示性文字材料，一定要有所涉及。

第2段200字左右：段首讲述分论点一，如第一节的内容是几个分论点的简单组合，则“分论点一”适宜放在段尾。这样和分论点二、分论点三的位置区别开来，使行文有变化。“分论点一”论证不许举例，采用纯分析的说理论据展开。

第3段200字左右：段首讲述分论点二，采用举例论证，首选作文题提示中的例子来分析论证，同时也可辅助一个自己举的例子，自己举的例子要比前例文字少。如没有作文题提示中的例子，则自己举个典型的例子来分析论证，同样要求叙写例子的文字一定要比分析论证的文字少。否则对文体特征会产生重创，影响得分。

第4段200字左右：段首讲述分论点三。采用联系实际举例。这是写作本文的时代意义所在。联系的实际可以是学习、生活、社会任何一个方面，目的是或提高思想认识，或明确是非正邪，或提出解决的方法途径，或揭示某种疑难迷惑，总之要给人以启发。

第5段150字左右：要再现中心论点，扣住中心论点写出作用、意义、号召、展望等。易走题，影响得分)，点出写作的由头，作文题中含有的提示性文字材料，一定要有所涉及。

第2段200字左右：段首讲述分论点一，如第一节的内容是几个分论点的简单组合，则“分论点一”适宜放在段尾。这样和分论点二、分论点三的位置区别开来，使行文有变化。“分论点一”论证不许举例，采用纯分析的说理论据展开。

第3段200字左右：段首讲述分论点二，采用举例论证，首选作文题提示中的例子来分析论证，同时也可辅助一个自己举的例子，自己举的例子要比前例文字少。如没有作文题提示中的例子，则自己举个典型的例子来分析论证，同样要求叙写例子的文字一定要比分析论证的文字少。否则对文体特征会产生重创，影响得分。

第4段200字左右：段首讲述分论点三。采用联系实际举例。这是写作本文的时代意义所在。联系的实际可以是学习、生活、社会任何一个方面，目的是或提高思想认识，或明确是非正邪，或提出解决的方法途径，或揭示某种疑难迷惑，总之要给人以启发。

第5段150字左右：要再现中心论点，扣住中心论点写出作用、意义、号召、展望等。易走题，影响得分)，点出写作的由头，作文题中含有的提示性文字材料，一定要有所涉及。

第2段200字左右：段首讲述分论点一，如第一节的内容是几个分论点的简单组合，则“分论点一”适宜放在段尾。这样和分论点二、分论点三的位置区别开来，使行文有变化。“分论点一”论证不许举例，采用纯分析的说理论据展开。

第3段200字左右：段首讲述分论点二，采用举例论证，首选作文题提示中的例子来分析论证，同时也可辅助一个自己举的例子，自己举的例子要比前例文字少。如没有作文题提示中的例子，则自己举个典型的例子来分析论证，同样要求叙写例子的文字一定要比分析论证的文字少。否则对文体特征会产生重创，影响得分。

第4段200字左右：段首讲述分论点三。采用联系实际举例。这是写作本文的时代意义所在。联系的实际可以是学习、生活、社会任何一个方面，目的是或提高思想认识，或明确是非正邪，或提出解决的方法途径，或揭示某种疑难迷惑，总之要给人以启发。

第5段150字左右：要再现中心论点，扣住中心论点写出作用、意义、号召、展望等。

1. 不用说……

It goes without saying that …

= (It is) needless to say (that) ….

= It is obvious that ….

例：It goes without saying that it pays off to keep early hours.

不用说早睡早起是值得的。

2. 在各种……之中，……

Among various kinds of …, … /= Of all the …, …

例︰Among various kinds of sports, I like jogging in particular.

在各种运动中我尤其喜欢慢跑。

3. 就我的看法……;我认为……

In my opinion, …

= To my mind, ….

= As far as I am concerned, …

= I am of the opinion that ….

例：In my opinion, playing video games not only takes much time but is also harmful to health.

在我看来，玩电脑游戏既花费时间也有害健康。

4. 随着人口的增加…… With the increase/growth of the population, …

随着科技的进步…… With the advance of science and technology, …

例：With the rapid development of Taiwan’s economy, a lot of social problems have come to pass.

随着台湾经济的快速发展许多社会问题产生了。

5. ……是必要的 It is necessary (for sb.) to do/that …

…… 是重要的 It is important/essential (for sb.) to do / that …

…… 是适当的 It is proper (for sb.) to do / that …

……是紧急的 It is urgent (for sb.) to do / that …

例：It is proper for us to keep the public places clean.

=It is proper that we (should) keep the public places clean.

我们应当保持公共场所清洁。

6. 花费 spend … on sth. / doing sth. …

例：We shouldn’t spend too much time on something we aren’t interested in.

我们不应该在我们不感兴趣的事情上花太多的时间。

7. how 引导的感叹句

例：At least it will prove how honest you are.

那至少可以证明你很诚实。

8. 状语从句

⑴ 如果你不…，你就会… If you don’t ..., you’ll ...

例︰If you don’t keep working hard, you’ll lose the chance.

如果你不坚持努力工作，你就会失去这次机会。

⑵ 如此 ……，以至于…… so … that …

例：At that moment, I was so upset that I wanted to give up.

当时，我非常伤心，最后都想放弃了。

⑶ 每当我听到……我就忍不住感到兴奋。Whenever I hear …, I cannot but feel excited.

每当我做……我就忍不住感到悲伤。 Whenever I do …, I cannot but feel sad.

每当我想到……我就忍不住感到紧张。Whenever I think of …, I cannot but feel nervous.

每当我遭遇……我就忍不住感到害怕。Whenever I meet with …, I cannot but feel frightened.

每当我看到……我就忍不住感到惊讶。Whenever I see …, I cannot but feel surprised.

例：Whenever I think of the clean brook near my home, I cannot but feel sad.

= Every time I think of the clean brook near my home, I cannot help feeling sad.

每当我想到我家附近那一.��清澈的小溪我就忍不住感到悲伤。

9. 宾语从句

我认为，…… / 我认为……不...... I think / I don’t think that …

我想知道是否…… I wonder whether …

例：He doesn’t think I should stop him joining the club.

他认为我不应该阻止他参加这个俱乐部。

10. Since + S + 过去式, S + 现在完成式.

例：Since he went to senior high school, he has worked very hard.

自从他上高中，他就一直很用功。

1.想像类的题目不要表现什么主题，只要写得有趣有益就行;

2.结尾段千万不能用议论或表决心，最后仍然是描写，与开头呼应，如果与开头基本相同，也很有特色;

4.语文大考时，起码要为文章留好一个小时的时间，基础知识的检查放在作文之后。修改时要使用标准的修改符号，并注意卷面的整洁。

5.认真的书写是成功的前提。阅读者会在第一眼就对你留下良好印象;

6.写作时，应在选材和形式上多加斟酌，表现出你的智慧、思想和追求，即使阅卷者也自愧不如;

7.文章中应充满强烈的感情secai，因为唯有强烈的情感才能打动人心;

8.对手中的素材加以小小的修饰，使之更感人，更鲜明和更富有美感，这不是虚假，而是美化;

9.写作中要加进至少一种新颖的尝试，这种尝试是你从未使用过的。唯有你自己都觉得新鲜的东西，别人也才会觉得新鲜;

10、以第一人称写作最适宜抒情，并增加文章的真实感和可信度。

11.考试前几日，可以有选择地翻阅一些高品质作文图书，以帮助打开思路;

12.考试作文的最低要求是文顺和切题，达到了这两个要求，基本分数就可以拿到;

13.考试时要不要打草稿，这要视各人情况而定，一般来说，因为费时，所以尽量免去;

14.一篇文章起码分有四段，在六七段最为适宜;

15.书写整洁极其重要，阅卷老师的第一好感来自于你的字迹;

16.开头第一段一定要全力以赴，用描写手法描写人物形态、事件过程或景物特色。成功的开头占据全文得分的50%;

17.遇到生冷的作文题，不要害怕，缩小其范围，发现其核心，即可行文;

18.如果考试题已经做过，那肯定是一件大好事，当然，需要你“更上一层楼”;

19.像叙述一个故事给好朋友听一样，口语化的语言就像录音，非常生动有趣;

20、语言幽默一些，增加趣味性，让阅卷老师也忍不住笑出声来，这样的文章一定能得高分;