法治政府百强部分排名情况【精彩20篇】

随着社会的逐渐发展与变化，危险分子的增多，现代的人们不得不开始“法治”行动，现在都开始提倡“弘扬法治文明”、“强化依法治国”。当然“法治”已经走进了我们的校园。

前几天老师跟我们说了一件事：我们年级段的一个女同学回家时，身后竟然跟着一个男子，这件事引发了我对校园法治的好奇心。现在，就让我化身成一个“法治小侦探”去摄像头那一探究竟吧！原来啊，那个女同学晚上放学回家时，一个人漫不经心地走在我们学校旁的麦德龙停车场旁，她走着走着忽然听见背后有脚步声在缓缓地向她靠近，她趁那个人不注意时，悄悄往背后瞄了一眼，发现原来是一个高大的黑衣男子，虽然他的帽子遮住了他的小半张脸，但依旧装作若无其事的样子看着手中的手机，眼中还带有几分慌张。我们细心的女同学早就发现他的神情不对劲，眼睛还时不时看她一眼。这时女孩心里已经忐忑不安，再也按耐不住了，于是她加快了回家的脚步，但谁知她的这一举动反倒引起了后边男子的怀疑，男子的脚步也越来越快，就快要追上她时，女孩急中生智，大喊了一声：“妈妈！”后边的黑衣男子赶紧往后倒退了几部，躲在了一个建筑物的背面，但没过多久他就发现了这个阴谋，于是又小跑着追上了女孩，这可谓是“不到黄河不死心啊！”但幸运的事发生了，女孩的眼中又充满了惊喜与希望，因为，她看到了已经停在前方的妈妈的车，于是她飞快地跑向妈妈的车，坐进了车里。而身后那个黑衣男子，依然装作只是顺路的模样加快脚步，溜走了。

学校也通过监控发现了这件事，立刻调查开来，又确认了女孩的安危才停止调查。经过调查，这个黑衣男子的确是不坏好意，企图拐卖少女。

通过这件事，我深深地感受到，现在的危险分子越来越多了，居然都敢明目张胆地来学校拐卖少女。幸亏她的妈妈及时出现，不然后果肯定不堪设想。看来，法治管理已经涉及到了校园。虽然法治已经走进了校园，但是我们一定要加强自身保护意识，防止一些危险分子的拐骗。

法治已经走进校园，离不开生活，就让让法治充满整个校园吧！我爱法治！

1月18日，石河子第二十二中学党支部在英语教室召开了全体党员教师专题组织生活会。会议由党支部书记高晖宗同志主持，开发区机关党委副书记刘江同志出席会议并全程指导。

会上，学校党支部书记高晖宗同志，向出席本次会议的开发区机关党委副书记刘江同志介绍了本次组织生活会的准备情况，并结合自己的本职工作带头进行全面认真的对照检查和自我剖析, 查摆突出问题和具体表现,深刻剖析产生问题的原因，明确今后的努力方向和整改措施。紧接着学校班子成员逐一对照“四讲四有”合格党员标准，认真开展批评与自我批评，每位班子成员均能放下包袱，消除顾虑，以严肃认真的态度，从党性的高度挖掘思想根源，做到解剖自己不怕严，亮出问题不怕丑，触及思想不怕痛，达到增强党性、增加共识、增进团结、共同提高的目的。

随后，在三个党小组组长的带领下，各个小组对照“四讲四有”合格党员标准，结合自身工作实际开展大讨论。在热烈的讨论中，党员们找出了自身存在的问题与不足，进一步明确了如何在“两学一做”活动中做一名真正的合格的党员教师。同时对基层党组织存在的问题进行了交流发言。党员们一致认为，坚决按照“讲政治、有信念，讲规矩、有纪律，讲道德、有品行，讲奉献、有作为”四讲四有标准，做一名合格的共产党员。每位党员教师都能全方位、多层次、多角度地观察自己，真真切切、清清楚楚地找出自己的缺点和不足。在反省自己、批评自己的同时，分享了其他同志的好事迹、好典型，并在此基础上各自提出整改措施。

开发区机关党委副书记刘江同志对本次专题组织生活会进行点评，他充分肯定学校开展“四讲四有”教育活动取得的阶段性成效，要求学校全体党员坚持以求真务实的精神和真抓实干的作风，牢固树立服务意识和群众观点，即知即改、立行立改，全力抓好整改落实，以活动的实际成效促进学校各项工作稳步推进。

此次党员专题组织生活会，不仅是一次学校领导班子与普通党员教师之间的思想交流，更是一次党员教师深刻自我认识，自我反思，自我促进的自省过程。会后，党员教师们表示，他们将更好的以“四讲四有”合格党员标准指导教育教学工作，促进学校各项发展更扎实、更有效，切实提高学校教育的质量。

更多热门文章：

今天，我们全班听了一堂关于“反对校园欺凌和暴力”为主题的普法教育课。整堂课中我的神经都紧绷着，从一件件案例中，我收获颇多，感慨也挺多。其中令我深思的，不仅是校园霸凌事件之多，更是被欺凌同学对法律知识的孤陋寡闻和他们的无助、可怜。

在法官讲述的四个案例之中，被欺凌同学对法律知识的一无所知让我大跌眼镜，他们的胆小如鼠和无助使我被深深震撼。案例一中的小王，因为被小吴所迫，不敢将此事告诉别人，结果每天的零花钱、早餐钱都被小吴“卷走”了，因此而面黄肌瘦，由一个阳光少年变成了古板、内向、胆小的男孩。案例二中的那个孩子，就是无助的代表。仅仅因为穿了一件漂亮衣服而被嫉妒，被疯狂地扇巴掌，从而在学校里不敢说话，连漂亮衣服也不敢穿了。这两个案例十分发人深省，令人沉思。

不光是这样，关于“法律知识知多少的”的话题，已经在网络上炸开了锅，记得我之前看的一篇报道：据大数据统计，全国参于调查的表少年中，有百分之十没有听说过《刑法》；有百分之十五不了解《刑法》；而有百分之三十，对《刑法》的认识不算多也不算少；剩下的百分之四十五，则是只知道《刑法》是政法方面的书，而且了解它的一些基本信息的内容的，但是不懂得用它保护自己。根据这个大数据，我们可以推断出青少年是多么地不了解他们的“护身符”—法律。所以，在中小学生中宣传、发展法律知识是势在必行的。

通过这实堂课，法官用简单实用的法律知识，解读了一个个生动鲜活、触目惊心的青少年犯罪案例，联系实际，以法论事，可谓是学校法制教育的一次“雪中送炭”，我真希望，青少年们一定要认真思考，努力规范自己行为，积极学法、懂法、守法、用法、护法，使这次法制教育起到应有的效果。我更希望青少年学习法治知识的人数更加多，范围更加广，从而在遇到一些涉及“校园霸凌与暴力”的事件时，能够用自己的法律知识，去保护自己！让我们一起，多多学习法律知识吧！

2013年1月7日,全国政法工作电视电话会议在北京举行,这是党的十八大后中央政法委召开的第一次全国政法工作会议。“平安中国”、“法治中国”、“过硬队伍”——会议对政法机关创造安全稳定社会环境、维护社会公平正义提出新要求，成为新时期全国政法工作的新思路、新目标。

2014年1月7日，习近平总书记在中央政法工作会议上强调,政法机关要把维护社会大局稳定作为基本任务,把促进社会公平正义作为核心价值追求,把保障人民安居乐业作为根本目标,为实现“两个一百年”奋斗目标、实现中华民族伟大复兴的中国梦提供有力保障。

从新的起点出发，全国各级政法机关和广大政法干警认真学习贯彻党的十八大、十八届三中全会和习近平总书记系列重要讲话精神，以党和国家工作大局为重，以最广大人民利益为念，全力推进平安中国、法治中国、过硬队伍建设，切实维护社会大局稳定,促进社会公平正义,保障人民安居乐业,忠诚履行中国特色社会主义事业建设者、捍卫者的神圣使命。

践行法治全力守护社会平安

推进法治中国、平安中国建设是政法工作的重大任务。平安是人民幸福安康的基本要求，是改革发展的基本前提。法治是经济发展、社会进步的客观要求，也是推进平安建设、实现国家长治久安的根本保障。

党的十八大明确提出深化平安建设，全国政法工作会议作出了建设平安中国新部署。

去年5月31日，深化平安中国建设工作会议在江苏苏州召开。中共中央政治局委员、中央政法委书记、中央综治委主任孟建柱强调，要积极适应小康社会新要求和人民群众新期待，在更高起点上全面推进平安中国建设，努力建设领域更广、人民群众更满意、实效性更强的平安中国。

时隔4个多月，中央政法委、中央综治委等中央五单位与中共浙江省委联合召开纪念毛泽东同志批示“枫桥经验”50周年大会，推动坚持和发展“枫桥经验”，把社会矛盾预防化解纳入法治轨道，引导群众通过法定程序表达诉求，提升依靠群众就地预防化解矛盾的水平。

今年1月7日，中央政法工作会议强调，要着眼于进一步解放和增强社会活力，创新社会治理方式，树立系统治理、综合治理、源头治理、依法治理理念，努力建设平安中国。

“中国社会正处于转型期，矛盾突发、多发，公众最需要的就是安全和谐稳定的社会环境。”有评论认为，党的十八大以来，政法工作运用法治思维建设平安中国的工作思路清晰可见，一个“大平安”体系正在形成。

深入开展打黑除恶、打击暴恐犯罪、打击电信诈骗、打击拐卖妇女儿童犯罪、打击侵害公民个人信息犯罪、治爆缉枪、扫毒害保平安……党的十八大以来，各级政法机关以人民群众对社会平安的需求为导向，紧紧抓住影响群众安全感的突出治安问题，组织开展一系列打击整治行动，成功侦办“3•19”湄公河特大跨国贩毒案、刘汉刘维特大黑社会性质组织犯罪集团案等一批影响重大的案件。

多破案不如少发案。各级政法机关注重加大矛盾纠纷排查化解力度，努力完善立体化社会防范体系和公共安全体系，积极推进平安建设网络化、信息化、社会化，最广泛地组织动员广大人民群众投身平安建设，创建人民群众追求的平安。

“民有所呼，我有所应;民有所求，我有所为。”依法惩治犯罪、维护群众权益的一整套“组合拳”，彰显各级政法机关保障人民群众安居乐业的坚强决心和艰辛付出。

以法为方，惩治食药犯罪——

针对食品药品安全犯罪发案居高不下的严峻形势，中央政法委积极推动综合治理形成整体合力。最高法、最高检发布《关于办理危害食品安全刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》，公安机关开展“云端行动”，加强源头治理。一批影响恶劣、危害巨大的食品药品案件先后侦破、宣判，一些跨地区犯罪网络被全环节铲除，危害食品药品安全犯罪的高发多发势头得以遏制。

重典治污，呵护美丽中国——

最高法、最高检出台《关于办理环境污染刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》，降低入刑门槛，解决办理环境污染刑事案件取证难、鉴定难、认定难等问题。仅半年时间，公安机关立案侦办环保部门移送的案件247起，相当于过去10年立案数总和。

厘清边界，探索依法治网——

公安部组织开展专项行动，剑指网上制造传播谣言等违法犯罪。最高法、最高检及时出台《关于办理利用信息网络实施诽谤等刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》，厘清网络言论的法律边界。如今，依法治网成效已经显现，网上制造传播谣言得到初步遏制。

《关于依法惩治性侵害未成年人犯罪的意见》、《关于审理编造、故意传播虚假恐怖信息刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》、《关于办理暴力恐怖和宗教极端刑事案件适用法律若干问题的意见》.....去年以来，一批司法解释和相关意见的密集出台，规范定罪量刑标准，是政法机关善于运用法治思维和法治方式解决矛盾和问题、推进平安中国建设的重要体现。

守护公平正义建设法治中国

涉法涉诉信访改革是难啃的“硬骨头”，被全国政法工作会议确定为政法系统重点改革项目之一，去年开始分四批在各省(区、市)政法机关开展改革试点。

中办、国办联合下发依法处理涉法涉诉信访问题的意见，要求实行诉讼与信访分离制度，把涉法涉诉信访事项从普通信访体制中分离出来，由政法机关依法处理。为推动涉法涉诉信访改革深入开展，中央政法委印发三个配套文件，推动政法机关建立健全导入、纠错、退出机制，进一步破解入口不顺、程序空转、出口不畅等难题。

各级政法机关从群众反映最强烈的地方改起，从健全制度机制抓起，积极稳妥推进改革措施的落实。“总体呈现‘弃访转法’的良好势头。”中央政法委有关负责人介绍说，今年以来，政法机关接待群众来访数量同比上升了7.1%，涉法涉诉信访事项受理率、立案率有了明显提高，涉法涉诉信访群众到党政信访部门上访数量明显减少。

严格执法、公正司法是政法工作的生命线。各级政法机关以解决群众反映强烈的突出执法司法问题为重点，深化司法体制改革，努力建设公正高效权威的司法制度，为法治中国建设筑牢坚实根基。

党的十八大以来，一项项司法体制改革举措相继出台，着眼总体谋划、注重顶层设计、尊重基层首创、解决现实问题。

——延续半个世纪的劳教制度退出历史舞台，符合国情的社区矫正制度正在健全完善。我国社区矫正累计接收社区服刑人员184.7万人，解除社区矫正113.8万人，社区矫正期间重新犯罪率只有0.2%，促进了社会和谐稳定。

——进一步推进户籍制度改革，“农”与“非农”将成为历史。国务院印发《关于进一步推进户籍制度改革的意见》，明确到2020年，基本建立以人为本、科学高效、规范有序的新型户籍制度，努力实现1亿左右农业转移人口和其他常住人口在城镇落户。

——建立国家司法救助制度，解决好信访群众法度之外、情理之中的问题。中央有关部门制定下发《关于建立完善国家司法救助制度的意见(试行)》，要求地方各级财政部门将国家司法救助资金列入预算，统筹安排。

——严格规范减刑、假释、保外就医程序，强化监督制度。中央政法委出台《关于严格规范减刑、假释、暂予监外执行 切实防止司法腐败的指导意见》。为杜绝暗箱操作，中央政法机关细化相关规定，完善监督检查制度。

——健全错案防止、纠正、责任追究机制。中央政法委出台防止冤假错案指导意见后，最高法发布建立健全防范刑事冤假错案工作机制的意见，要求各级法院守住司法底线;最高检、公安部、国家安全部、司法部完善执法办案多项制度。

——司法公开深入推进，让司法权力在阳光下运行。最高法全面推进审判流程公开、裁判文书公开、执行信息公开三大平台建设;最高检建立检察机关终结性法律文书公开制度;公安部提出建立互联网执法公开平台，全面公开执法信息;司法部在监狱系统全面推进狱务公开，以公开促公正、保廉洁。

——全国人大常委会审议通过了《关于在北京、上海、广州设立知识产权法院的决定》，标志着设立知识产权法院工作已进入实质性阶段。

国无法则人无矩，法不公则国不稳。“努力让人民群众在每一个司法案件中都能感受到公平正义”，习近平总书记对政法机关提出的努力目标和明确要求，也是人民群众对在全社会实现公平正义的殷切期待。

完善司法人员分类管理、完善司法责任制、健全司法人员职业保障、推动省以下地方法院检察院人财物统一管理，是司法体制改革的基础性、制度性措施，牵一发而动全身，需要通过试点逐步推进。

推行主审法官责任制、合议庭办案责任制、检察官办案责任制，打破层层审批的行政化做法，“让审理者裁判，由裁判者负责”...... 4项改革在上海、广东、吉林、湖北、海南、青海6省市先行试点，于今年下半年渐次推开，为全国推进试点积累经验。

随着司法体制改革的强势推进， 一些直接影响社会公平正义的突出问题，正在一步步从体制机制上得到破解，人民群众感受到公平正义就在身边。

铁规禁令打造过硬政法队伍

9月29日，中央政法委公开通报13起政法干警违纪违法典型案件，这是中央政法委今年以来的第三次公开通报。

舆论普遍认为，三次通报自亮“家丑”，体现了政法系统清除害群之马的决心、反腐持续发力的态势,让人民群众看到了政法系统反腐倡廉正在常态化、制度化。

法治建设离不开一支信念坚定、执法为民、敢于担当、清正廉洁的政法队伍。去年以来，各级政法机关把过硬队伍建设摆到更加突出的位置，坚持政治建警、素质强警、从严治警、科学用警，下大气力解决政法队伍中人民群众反映强烈的突出问题，政法队伍的亲和力和公信力得到提升。

各级政法机关深入开展党的群众路线教育实践活动，以抓铁有痕、踏石留印的劲头，坚决扭转“门难进、脸难看、话难听、事难办”和冷硬横推等不良风气，坚决遏制耍特权、抖威风和吃拿卡要、乱收乱罚等多发问题，坚决惩治执法不作为、乱作为等漠视群众疾苦、侵害群众利益行为，其力度之大、措施之实令群众刮目相看。

对于拥有300多万干警、经常同社会阴暗面打交道、手中又握有很大执法司法权的政法队伍来说，只有坚决把权力关进制度的笼子里,才能确保干警清正、队伍清廉。

中央政法委专题研究政法队伍纪律作风问题，强调对不良苗头，不能视而不见，要抓早抓小，在思想上设置“警戒线”，措施上筑起“防火墙”,努力用铁的纪律带出过硬队伍。最高法、最高检、公安部分别制定法官“十个不准”、检察官“八条禁令”、公安民警“三条纪律”,划定政法干警必须遵守的纪律底线,自觉接受社会监督。中华全国律师协会成立律师行风监督委员会,加强律师行风监督。

今年4月,政法领导干部学习贯彻习近平总书记重要讲话精神专题培训班在北京开班。6月,厅局级政法领导干部学习贯彻习近平总书记重要讲话精神专题培训班分两期举办,主要目的是打牢理想信念的基础,补足精神上的“钙”,提升新形势下维护社会和谐稳定的能力。与此同时，各级政法机

关强化教育培训，推进政法队伍专业化、职业化、正规化建设。

世情国情的深刻变化，政法工作任务越来越繁重,执法环境越来越复杂,对政法队伍提出的要求越来越高。及时回应群众关切，提升新媒体时代社会沟通能力，是政法机关加强执法司法能力建设的新课题。

截至去年年底，我国政法微博总数已达2.4万，占政务微博的四分之一。各级政法机关运用官方微博、微信及时发布权威信息，与公众互动交流，在润物无声中传递法治精神，推动全社会形成尊重法律、祟尚法治的良好氛围。

政治清明、社会公平、民心稳定、长治久安，法治是根本之道。全国各级政法机关和广大政法干警立足职能、脚踏实地、埋头苦干，在推进法治中国建设征程中昂扬奋进。

近日，中央下发了《关于在全体党员中开展“学党章党规、学系列讲话，做合格党员”学习教育方案》，确立了猴年“两学一做”党建目标任务。真抓才会见成效，党建考核要跟上，书记述职要汇报。杜绝“两张皮”、真抓实干，方能打造“合格党员”，正本清源、引领前行。

“两学一做”铸就“铁军”。我国现有党员约8700万，分布在各行各业，发挥着中坚骨干作用。党性决定党的宗旨是“为人民服务”——要让人民群众过上好日子，要踏步“四个全面”征程，实现“两个一百年”奋斗目标。这是全体共产党人的神圣使命，需要每一名党员不懈努力和牺牲精神，需要各级党组织去精心呵护、培育茁壮……中央开展“两学一做”就是要锤炼当此重任的队伍，以崇高品德、顽强意志身先士卒、践行有为，铸就辉煌、谱写颂歌。

“两学一做”孕育创新中国。当下正值“十三五”规划开局年，“大众创业，万众创新”是时代“交响曲”，是实现经济转型升级、跨跃式发展的“活化剂”，也是新一届政府倾力打造推动的。“两学一做”是以思想导航筑基铺路，夯实理论基础、壮大队伍，打造作风顽强、技术过硬能担当重任的生力军。 “两学”就是端正认识、坚定信念，树锐意进取、敢打胜仗的作风品德;“一做”是做合格党员，就要践行创业创新，在改革的浪潮中显本事、做贡献。当下，小康社会建成进入最后五年冲刺，分布各方的8700万党员应不辱使命、创新创业、攻坚克难、夺取胜利。

书记是第一责任人。书记带头“两学一做”唤起党员意识和责任。“我志愿加入中国共产党，拥护党的纲领，遵守党的章程……”这是每一名党员入党时宣誓的誓词。随着时间的推移，一些党员在市场经济的浪潮中，在西方不良思想和腐朽生活的影响下，党性意识和党员责任淡化，出现了背离党的宗旨的党风问题，甚至出现违反党纪国法的腐败问题。“两学一做”就是以正面引导立标尺、筑底线，将迷失方身、走上迷途的党员重新拉回队伍中来，重新找回一名合格党员的思想觉悟。

“从严治党”书记要汇报。书记要敢于担当，“两学一做”须“两手抓”“两手硬”。一要不打折扣地落实“两学”，抓理论学习、作风建设永不松懈。各级党组织要充分利用“三会一课”、“党员学习日”、“党委(组)学习日”等方式，系统学习“党章”和系列讲话，以“学而思”“思而行”悟其精髓、融汇贯通，做到在党言党、在党忧党、在党为党。二要严标准、严要求，做合格党员不能止于“合格”。要向优秀党员——全国优秀县委书记学习，树立道德的高标准，模范尊守党章党纪，做“四有三为”干部。

总之，我们要在“两学一做”活动中，以党员的责任感、荣誉感，筑牢思想底线、增强创新本领，全身心投入“四个全面”征程和改革开放的历史洪流中，以“严”“实”作风疾书改革大业，为“两个一百年”目标实现、为中华民族伟大复兴而奋斗。

地方政府负责以下方面的环境保护建设。

一、生态环境保护与培育建设

主要内容包括：

合理利用现有林场，在林场内适当建设苗圃、良种繁育基地，进一步扩大园林种质资源存储量； 沿景区交通主干道和次级干道构建护路的生态林网； 构建旅游服务中心区及度假休闲中心区的以风景观赏为主的点、线、面、片立体绿化格局； 实施规划区内部绿色隔离区的建设； 建立原始次生森林植被保护区； 严格执行国家植被建设和保护的有关规定，建立人工和自然生态系统中植被体系的监测系统。 二、环境卫生建设

主要包括：

（1） 垃圾处理建设

**旅游区内广泛设置垃圾箱，组织专人对垃圾及时集中和清扫,实行垃圾统一清运处理。在旅游区内的游步道上，每隔50－100m的距离应设置垃圾筒；在重要节点、片区以及人流量大的地方要设置容量较大的垃圾箱；车行游览路线垃圾箱间距为300m。在规划范围建设垃圾收集点和垃圾收集站垃，将附近垃圾箱中垃圾集中，便于将垃圾运出景区、集中处理。

景区内垃圾的收集、运输、处理和最终处置，由景区环卫部门统一管理。

（二）公共卫生系统建设与管理

按照4A级景区的标准建设一批高质量、高标准的旅游厕所。分固定式和临时式。旅游区入口公共厕所设计、建造达到三星级旅游厕所的要求；其余景区地段，至少达到二星级旅游厕所的标准。三星级旅游厕所建筑面积60 m2以上，室内高度宜3m以上，男女厕位比例（不含男用小便器）为6:4，大便厕位建筑面积每个为4m2以上。

三、文物保护建设

将以下资源列为县级以上保护。

1．红色旅游资源——太岳县旧址。

2．古建筑——殷家老屋等**西南古建筑、村落，九老亭、转背桥等古建筑。

3．名人故居——胡汉三、程氏家族等**名人。

4．古树名木——冶溪镇2000余棵古树名木。

5．古寺庙——包括二祖寺在内的五寺九庵。

6、古建筑、古村落

（1）前河村殷氏三兄弟住宅。

（2）河西村店前**岸的清末民初的程姓县长的三处宅院。

（3）店前村程家老屋——县级文物保护单位。

（4）冶溪镇方氏联庆堂。

（5）清初状元李正筠故宅——李家老屋。

在日常生活中，税收与我们的生活息息相关。它伴随着人类文明的足迹一路走来，是国之血脉，是公共需要。为引导全社会树立税收法治观念，增强广大公民依法纳税意识，推动国税法治同行文化建设，市国税局特面向社会和广大纳税人，举办“法治与税收”主题征文活动。具体事项通知如下：

一、征文要求

1. 征文要围绕“法治与税收”主题，题目自拟，内容积极向上，既可讲述令人难忘的征税故事，也可追忆印象深刻的办税经历;既可畅谈法治税收对生活的影响，也可写税收对社会的贡献;既可以情节打动人，也可以思辨启迪人。

2. 文体以散文、记实、随笔为主、字数2000字左右。

3. 要求原创作品，且未公开发表过，不得抄袭，套改，文责自负。

二、征集时间

即日起至2016年11月25日。

三、报送渠道

征文邮箱：jiandesgs@163.com;

来稿请在邮件主题注明“法治与税收”征文字样，稿件文末注明真实姓名、有效联系电话、所在单位。

四、奖项设置

税收法治征文大赛组委会将在截稿后将组织有关单位专家和资深作家，对全部有效参赛作品进行评选。结果将在今日建德、“建德国税”微信公众号进行公布。本次活动设一等奖1名，奖金800元;二等奖2名，奖金各600元;三等奖3名，奖金各400元，优秀奖10名，奖金各200元。

本次征文相关规定及未尽事宜，由建德市国税局负责解释。

心态

父子二人看到一辆十分豪华的进口轿车。儿子不屑地对他的父亲说：坐这种车的人，肚子里一定没有学问！父亲则轻描淡写地回答：说这种话的人，口袋里一定没有钱！

情况不同

一只小猪、一只绵羊和一头乳牛，被关在同一个畜栏里。有一次，牧人捉住小猪，小猪大声号叫，猛烈地抗拒。绵羊和乳牛讨厌小猪的号叫，便说：他常常捉我们，我们并不大呼小叫。小猪听了回答道：捉你们和捉我完全是两回事，他捉你们，只是要你们的毛和乳汁，但是捉住我，却是要我的命！

【经典评论】：你对事情的看法，是不是也反映出你内心真正的态度？立场不同、所处环境不同的人，很难了解对方的感受；因此对别人的失意、挫折、伤痛，不宜幸灾乐祸，而应要有关怀、了解的心情。

鸡年桃献瑞，狗岁包平安。伴随着时代的脚步，我们满怀胜利的喜悦和奋进的豪情，迎来了新世纪又一轮朝阳。在此，我谨代表中院党组，向全院干警致以春节的问候和祝福!向支持、帮助和关心法院建设的干警家属和社会各界人士表示诚挚的谢意和问候!祝身体健康、工作顺利、合家欢乐!

过去的一年，是我院各项工作求实创新取得丰硕成果的一年。这一年，我们围绕“公正与效率”主题，践行司法为民宗旨，认真履行宪法和法律赋予人民法院的职责，全面落实中院党组确立的“11142”工作思路，审判工作、法院改革、队伍建设、基层基础建设等各方面的工作都取得了新的进展。这一年，中院共受理各类案件6640件，审(执)结6484件，未结案156件，结案率为97.65%，同比上升0.17%，收结案继续保持良性循环。法院改革方面，全面落实公开审判制度，继续推进审判方式、审判组织改革、优化了审判和司法政务管理;队伍建设上，中院制定的《加强思想政治工作若干规定》，使思想政治工作经常化、制度化、规范化。省法院、市委组织部、宣传部作了推广和介绍;全市法院干警保持了前所未有的拼搏、进取、向上的精神面貌，见义勇为、拒绝贿赂等好人好事层出不穷，涌现出了受市级以上表彰的先进集体29个，先进个人116人。值得一提的是，中院审判大楼历时3年建成，于5月底搬迁投入使用。审判法庭的落成，凝集着上级法院领导的真切关心，凝集着曲靖市委、市人大、市政府领导以及有关部门的理解支持，也凝集着施工单位全体人员的辛勤汗水。审判法庭的落成，又为麒麟古城增添了一道亮丽的风景线，也是中院建设史上的一座里程碑，它为我院干警工作学习和生活创造了良好的环境，为中院争创全省一流法院奠定了坚实的基础，它翻开了我市法院历史的新画卷，标志着我市法院全面建设从此跨入了一个新的发展时期。继中院审判法庭顺利搬迁后，沾益县法院审判法庭也完成搬迁;在建的6个基层法院审判法庭有5个已经封顶，进入装修阶段。我们有理由相信，明天的法院将比今天更美好。

新的一年，是深入贯彻落实党的十六大和十六届四中全会精神的重要一年，也是围绕“公正与效率”主题，加强司法能力建设，践行司法为民宗旨，突出审判工作、队伍建设、法院改革和基层基础建设四个重点，争创全省一流法院的关键之年。面对新的形势新的任务，我院工作必须在开拓创新上下功夫，在力求实效上下功夫，在练内功、树形象、上台阶下功夫，在实现四个提高上下功夫，在创建“六无”法院上下功夫。

我们殷切地希望领导班子都能成为更加团结、更加坚强的领导核心。每个班子成员都要一身正气，两袖清风，政治坚定，业务精通，身先士卒，刚直不阿。既善于统揽全局，集思广益，深谋远虑，运筹帷幄;又能够严谨细致，在成绩面前临深履薄，不骄不躁，循序渐进。从而形成强大的凝聚力和战斗力，在党委的领导、人大的监督、政府和各有关部门的支持下，把全市两级法院都建成全省的示范法院，为实现"公正与效率"这一世纪主题做出新的贡献!

我们殷切地希望每一位法官和法院工作人员都既能够高度自律，以更高、更严的标准要求自己，又能充分的发挥团队协作精神，在以审判为中心的各项工作中发挥聪明才智，再创佳绩，为全省乃至全国法院做出榜样，决不要辜负党和人民的厚望。希望你们继续大胆探索，创造更多新鲜经验。

新的起点，新的征程。让我们携起手来，始终坚持与时俱进，始终坚持第一要务，始终坚持司法为民，勇于争先、长于实干、乐于奉献，再创我院工作新的辉煌!

我曾参加过一个叫" 懂礼仪，守法纪，讲诚信"的活动。通过这次活动，我从中感悟到了很多。

"懂礼仪"是我们小学生应具有的。在客人说话时不要插嘴;遇到长辈时要问好;出门在外要和父母打招呼;老师或家长批评你时不要东张西望，要虚心听批评;所以，我认为懂礼仪也是一门重要的学问。

法律是维持社会安定的武器，我们应该懂法、知法、守法，应用法律武器保护自己。在校园内，我们小学生应做到别违反法纪。不乱打骂人;不在楼梯内打闹;在校园内不骑自行车;不随意损坏学校财产;因此，守法纪是每个人都要做到的。

诚信是人与人沟通重要的一部分。一旦人与人之间失去诚信，就没人会相信你。

从前有一个中国学生去日本工作，在一家餐馆洗碗，对方要求洗七次，而这个中国学生投机取巧，只洗了五次。从此，这个中国学生就再也找不到工作了。从这里可以看出：人不能失去诚信，要讲诚信，否则没人会再相信你。

通过这次活动，我觉得每个人都应该拥有"懂礼仪，守法纪，讲诚信"这三种品质，三者缺一不可。

[关于法治与道德的作文

下面的材料旨在丰富学生在是非问题写作方面的思想和语言，考生在复习时可以先分类阅读这些篇章，然后尝试写相关方面的作文题。

对于素材中用黑体字的部分，特别建议你熟读，背诵，因为它们在语言和观点上都值得吸收。学习语言的人应该明白，表达能力和思想深度都靠日积月累，潜移默化。从某种意义上说，提高英语写作能力无捷径可走，你必须大段背诵英语文章才能逐渐形成语感和用英语进行表达的能力。这一关，没有任何人能代替你过。

因此，建议你下点苦功夫，把背单词的精神拿出来背诵文章。何况，并不是要求你背了之后永远牢记在心：你可以这个星期背，下个星期忘。这没有关系，相信你的大脑具有神奇的能力。背了工具箱里的文章后，你会惊讶的发现：I can think in English now！

1.?????? Proverbs

1. A graduation ceremony is an event where the commencement speaker tells thousands of students dressed in identical caps and gowns that individuality is the key to success.

2. The primary purpose of a liberal education is to make one’s mind a pleasant place in which to spend one’s time.

3. Next in importance to freedom and justice is popular education, without which neither freedom nor justice can be permanently maintained.

4. The classroom--not the trench--is the frontier of freedom now and forevermore.

5. Education’s purpose is to replace an empty mind with an open one.

6. It is the purpose of education to help us become autonomous, creative, inquiring people who have the will and intelligence to create our own destiny.

7. You see, real ongoing, lifelong education doesn’t answer questions; it provokes them.

8. People will pay more to be entertained than educated.

9.the most important function of education at any level is to develop the personality of the individual and the significance of his life to himself and to others. This is the basic architecture of a life; the rest is ornamentation and decoration of the structure.

10. The essence of our efforts to see that every child has a chance must be to assure each as equal opportunity, not to become equal, but to become different-to realize whatever unique potential of body, mind, and spirit he or she possesses.

11. A great teacher never strives to explain his vision-he simply invites you to stand beside him and see for yourself.

12. If you can read and don’, you are an illiterate by choice.

2. Damaging Research

A study by National Parent-Teacher Organization revealed that in the average American school, eighteen negatives are identified for every positive that is pointed out. The Wisconsin study revealed that when children enter the first grade, 80 percent of them feel pretty good themselves, but by the time they get to the sixth grade, only 10 percent of them have good self-images.

3. Education and Citizenship

An important aspect of education in the United States is the relationship between education and citizenship. Throughout its history this nation has emphasized public education as a means of transmitting democratic values, creating equality of opportunity, and preparing new generations of citizens to function in society. In addition, the schools have been expected to help shape society itself. During the 1950s, for example, efforts to combat racial segregation focused on the schools. Later, when the Soviet Union launched the first orbiting satellite, American schools and colleges came under intense pressure and were offered many incentives to improve their science and mathematics programs so that the nations would not fall behind the Soviet Union in scientific and technological capabilities.

Education is often viewed as a tool for solving social problems, especially social inequality. The schools, t is thought, can transform young people from vastly different backgrounds into competent, upwardly mobile adults. Yet these goals seem almost impossible to attain. In recent years, in fact, public education has been at the center of numerous controversies arising from the gap between the ideal and the reality. Part of the problem is that different groups in society have different have different expectations. Some feel that children should be taught basic job-related skills; still others believe education should not only prepare children to compete in society but also help them maintain their cultural identity (and, in the case of Hispanic children, their language). On the other hand, policymakers concerned with education emphasize the need to increase the level of student achievement and to improve parents in their children’s education.

Some reformers and critics have called attention to the need to link formal schooling with programs designed to address social problems. Sociologist Charles Moscos, for example, is a leader in the movement to expand programs like the Peace Corps, Vista, and Outward Bound into a system of voluntary national service. National service, as Moscos defines it, would entail “the full-time undertaking of public duties by young people whether as citizen soldiers or civilian servers-who are paid subsistence wages” and serve for at least one year. In return for this period of service, the volunteers would receive assistance in paying for college or other educational expenses.

Advocates of national service and school-to-work programs believe that education does not have to be confined to formal schooling. In devising strategies to provide opportunities for young people to serve their society, they emphasize the educational value of citizenship experiences gained outside the classroom. At this writing there is little indication that national service will become a new educational institution in the United States, although the concept is steadily gaining support among educators and social critics.

4. The Teacher’s Role

Given the undeniable importance of classroom experience, sociologists have done a considerable amount of research on what goes on in the classroom. Often they start from the premise that, along with the influence of peers, students’ experiences in the classroom are of central importance to their later development. One study examined the impact of a single first-grade teacher on her students’ subsequent adult status. The surprising results of this study have important implications. It is evident that good teachers can make a big difference in children’s lives, a fact that gives increased urgency to the need to improve the quality of primary-school teaching. The reforms carried out by educational leaders like James Comer suggest that when good teaching is combined with high levels of parental involvement the results can be even more dramatic.

Because the role of the teacher is to change the learner in some way, the teacher-student relationship is an important part of education. Sociologists have pointed out that this relationship is asymmetrical or unbalanced, with the teacher being in a position of authority and the student having little choice but to passively absorb the information provided by the teacher. In other words, in conventional classrooms there is little opportunity for the students to become actively involved in the learning process. On the other hand, students often develop strategies for undercutting the teacher’s authority: mentally withdrawing, interrupting, and the like. Hence, much current research assumes that students and teachers influence each other instead of assuming that the influence is always in a single direction.

5. Education Philosophy

For the past fifty years our schools have operated on the theories of John Dewey (1859-1953), an American educator and writer. Dewey believed hat the school’s job was to enhance the natural development of the growing child, rather than to pour information, for which the child had no context, into him or her. In the Dewey system, the child becomes the active agent in his own education, rather than a passive receptacle for facts.

Consequently, American schools are very enthusiastic about teaching “life skills” –logical thinking, analysis, creative problem--solving. The actual content of the lessons is secondary to the process, which is supposed to train the child to be able to handle whatever life may present, including all the unknowns of the future. Students and teachers both regard pure memorization as an uncreative and somewhat vulgar.

In addition to “life skills”, schools are assigned to solve the ever growing stoke of social problems. Racism, teenage pregnancy, alcoholism, drug use, reckless driving, and are just a few of the modern problems that have appeared on the school curriculum.

This all contributes to a high degree of social awareness in American youngsters.

6. Student Life

To the students, the most notable difference between elementary school and the higher levels is that in junior high they start “changing classes”. This means that rather than spending the day in one classroom, they switch classrooms to meet their different teachers. This gives them three or four minutes between classes in the hallways, where a great deal of the important social action of high school traditionally takes place. Students have lockers in these hallways, around which thy congregate.

Society in general does not take the business of studying very seriously. Schoolchildren have a great deal of free time, which they are encouraged to fill with extracurricular activities—sports, clubs, cheerleading, scouts—supposed to inculcate such qualities as leadership, sportsmanship, ability to organize, etc. those who don’t become engaged in such activities or have afterschool jobs have plenty of opportunity to “hang out”, listen to teenager music, and watch television.

Compared to other nations, American students do not have much homework. Studies also show that American parents have lower expectations for their children’s success in school than other nationalities do. (Historically, there has not been much correlation between American school success and success in later life.) “He’s just not a scholar”, the American parents might say, content that their son is on the swim team and doesn’t take drugs. (Some of the young do choose to study hard, for reason of their own, such as determining that the road to riches lies through Harvard Business School.)

What American schools do effectively teach is the competitive method. In innumerable ways children are pitted against each other—whether in classroom discussion, spelling bees, reading groups, or tests. Every classroom is expected to produce a scattering of A’s and F’s (teachers often grade A=excellent; B=good; C=average; D=poor; and F=failed). A teacher who gives all A’s looks too soft—so students are aware that they are competing for the limited number of top marks.

Foreign students sometimes don’t understand that copying from other people’s papers or from books is considered wrong and taken seriously. Here, it is important to show that you have done your own work and are displaying your own knowledge. It is more important than helping your friends to pass, whom we think do not deserve to pass unless they can provide their own answers. Group effort goes against the competitive grain, and American students do not study together as many Asians do. Many Asians in this country consider their group study habits a large contributor to their school success.

7. Adult Education

After complaining about many aspects of American life, a 40-year-old woman from Hong Kong concluded, “But where else could someone my age go back to school and get a degree in social work? Here you can change your whole life, start a new business, do what you really want to do.”

So at least to this person, school requirements weren’t inhibiting. And to millions of others, adult education is the path to a new career, or if not to a new career, to a new outlook. Schools generally encourage the older person who wants to start anew, and besides regular classes, schedule evening classes in special programs. Today there are so many people of retirement age in college that it is no longer remarkable.

8. Moral Relativism in American

Improving American education requires not doing new things but doing (and remembering) some good old things. At the time of our nation’s founding, Thomas Jefferson listed the requirements for a sound education in the Report of the Commissioners for the University of Virginia. In this landmark statement on American education, Jefferson wrote of the importance of education and writing, and of reading history, and geography. But he also emphasized the need “to instruct the mass of our citizens in these, their rights, interests, and duties, as men and citizens.” Jefferson believed education should aim at the improvement of both one’s “morals” and “faculties”. That has been the dominant view of the aims of American education for over two centuries. But a number of changes, most of them unsound, have diverted schools from these great pursuits. And the story of the loss of the school’s original moral mission explains a great deal.

Starting in the early seventies, “values clarification” programs started turning up in schools all over America. According to this philosophy, the schools were not to take part in their time-honored task of transmitting sound moral values; rather, they were to allow the child to “clarify” his own values (which adults, including parents, had no “rights” to criticize). The “values clarification” movement didn’t clarify values; it clarified wants and desires. This form of moral relativism said, in effect, that no set of values was right or wrong; everybody had an equal right to his own values; and all values were subjective, relative, and personal. This destructive view took hold with a vengeance.

In 1985 The York Times published an article quoting New York area educators, in slavish devotion to this new view, proclaiming, “They deliberately avoid trying to tell students what is ethically right and wrong.” The article told of one counseling session involving fifteen high school juniors and seniors. In the course of that session a student concluded that a fellow student had been foolish to return one thousand dollars she found in a purse at school. According to the article, when the youngsters asked the counselor’s opinion, “He told them he believed the girl had done the right thing, but that, of course, he would not try to force his values on them. ‘If I come from the position of what is wrong,’ he explained, ‘then I’m not their counselor.’”

Once upon a time, a counselor offered counselor, and he knew that an adult does not form character in the young by taking a stance of neutrality toward questions of right and wrong or by merely offering “choices” or “options”.

In response to the belief that adults and educators should teach children sound morals, one can expect from some quarters indignant objections (I’ve heard one version of it expressed countless times over the years): “Who are you to say what’s important?” or “Whose standards and judgments do we use?”

The correct response, it seems to me, is, is we ready to do away with standards and judgments? Is anyone going to argue seriously that a life of cheating and swindling is as worthy as a life of honest, hard work? Is anyone (with the exception of some literature professors at our elite universities) going to argue seriously the intellectual corollary, that a Marvel comic book is as good as Macbeth? Unless we are willing to embrace some pretty silly position, we’ve got to admit the need for moral and intellectual standards. The problem is that some people tend to regard anyone who would pronounce a definitive judgment as an unsophisticated Philistine or a closed-minded “elitist” trying to impose his view on everybody else.

The truth of the real world is that without standards and judgments, there can be no progress. Unless we are prepared to say irrational things—that nothing can be proven more valuable than anything else or that everything is equally worthless—we must ask the normative question. It may come, as a surprise to those who fell that to be “progressive” is to be value-neutral. But as Matthew Amold said, “the world is forwarded by having its attention fixed on the best things” and if the world can’t decide what the best things are, at least to some degree, then it follows that progress, and character, is in trouble. We shouldn’t be reluctant to declare that some things, some lives, books, ideas, and values are better than others. It is the responsibility of the schools to teach these better things.

At one time, we weren’t so reluctant to teach them. In the mid-nineteenth century, a diverse, widespread group of crusaders began to work for the public support of what was then called the “common school”, the forerunner of the public school. They were to be charged with the mission of school felt that the nation could fulfill its destiny only if every new generation was taught these values together in a common institution.

The leaders of the common school movement were mainly citizens who were prominent in their communities—businessmen, ministers, local civic and government officials. These people saw the schools as upholders of standards of individual morality and small incubators of civic and personal virtue; the founders of the public schools had faith that public education could teach good moral and civic character from a common ground of American values.

But in the past quarter century or so, some of the so-called experts became experts of value neutrality, and moral education was increasingly left in their hands. The commonsense view of parents and the publicthat schools should reinforce rather than undermine the values of home, family, and country, was increasingly rejected.

There are those today still that claim we are now too diverse a nation, that we consist of too many competing convictions and interests to instill common values. They are wrong. Of course we are a diverse people. We have always been a diverse people. And as Madison wrote in FederalistNo.10, the competing, balancing interests of a diverse people can help ensure the survival of liberty. But there are values that all American citizens share and that we should want all American students to know and to make their own: honesty, fairness, self-discipline, fidelity to task, friends, and family, personal responsibility, love of country, and belief in the principles of liberty, equality, and the freedom to practice one’s faith. The explicit teaching of these values is the legacy of the common schools, and it is a legacy to which we must return.

9. Schools Should Teach Values

People often said, “Yes, we should teach these values, but how do we teach them?” this question deserves a candid response, one that isn’t given often enough. It is by exposing our children to good character and inviting its imitation that we will transmit to them a moral foundation. This happens when teachers and principals, by their words and actions, embody sound convictions. As Oxford’s Mary Warnock has written, “You cannot teach morality without being committed to morality yourself; and you cannot be committed to morality yourself without holding that some things are right and others wrong.” The theologian Martin Buber wrote that the educator is distinguished from all other influences “by his will to take part in the stamping of character and by his consciousness that he represents in the eyes of the growing person a certain selection of what is, the selection of what is ‘right’, of what should be.” It is in this will, Buber says, in this clear standing for something, that the “vocation as an educator finds its fundamental expression.”

There is no escaping the fact that young people need as example principals and teachers who know the difference between right and wrong, good and bad, and who themselves exemplify high moral purpose.

As Education Secretary, I visited a class at Waterbury Elementary School in Waterbury, Vermont, and asked the students, “Is this a good school?” They answered, “Yes, this is a good school.” I asked them, “Why?” Among other things, one eight-year-old said, “The principal Mr. Riegel, makes good rules and everybody obeys them.” So I said, “Give me an example.” And another answered, “You can’t climb on the pipes in the bathroom. We don’t climb on the pipes and the principal doesn’t either.”

This example is probably too simple to please a lot of people who want to make the topic of moral education difficult, but there is something profound in the answer of those children, something education should pay more attention to. You can’t expect children to take messages about rules or morality seriously unless they see adults taking those rules seriously in their day-to-day affairs. Certain must be said, certain limits lay down, and certain examples set. There is no other way.

We should also do a better job at curriculum selection. The research shows that most “values education” exercises and separate courses in “moral reasoning” tend not to affect children’s behavior; if anything, they may leave children morally adrift. Where to turn? I believe our literature and our history are a rich quarry of moral literacy. We should mine that quarry. Children should have at their disposal a stock of examples illustrating what we believe to be right and wrong, good and bad—examples illustrating what are morally right and wrong can indeed be known and that there is a difference.

What kind of stories, historical events, and famous lives am I talking about? If we want our children to know about honesty, we should teach them about Abe Lincoln walking three miles to return six cents and conversely, about Aesop’s shepherd boy who cried wolf if we want them to know about courage, we should teach them about Joan of Arc, Horatius at the bridge, and Harriet Tubman and the Underground Railroad. If we want them to know about persistence in the face of adversity, they should know about the voyages of Columbus and the character of Washington during the Civil War. And our youngest should be told about the Little Engine That Could. If we want them to know about respect for the law, they should understand why Socrates told Crito: “No, I must submit to the decree of Athens.” If we want our children to respect the rights of others, they should read the Declaration of Independence, the Bill of Rights, the Gettysburg Address, and Martin Luther King, Jr.’ “Letter from Birmingham jail.” From the Bible they should know about Ruth’s loyalty to Naomi, Joseph’s forgiveness of his brothers, Jonathan’s friendship with David, the Good Samaritan’s kindness toward a stranger, and David’s cleverness and courage in facing Goliath.

These are only a few of the hundreds of examples we can call on. And we need not get into issues like nuclear war, abortion, creationism, or euthanasia. This may come as a disappointment to some people, but the fact is that the formation of character in young people is educationally a task different from, and prior to, the discussion of the great, difficult controversies of the day. First things come first. We should teach values the same way we teach other things: one step at a time. We should not use the fact that there are many difficult and controversial moral questions as an argument against basic instruction in the subject.

After all, we do not argue against teaching physics because laser physics is difficult, against teaching American history because there are heated disputes about the Founders’ intent. Every field has its complexities and its controversies. And every field has its basics, its fundamentals. So they are too with forming character and achieving moral literacy. As any parent knows, teaching character is a difficult task. But it is a crucial task, because we want our children to be healthy, happy, and successful but decent, strong, and good. None of this happens automatically; there is no genetic transmission of virtue. It takes the conscious, committed efforts of adults. It takes careful attention.

10. College Pressures

Mainly I try to remind that the road ahead is a long one and that it will have more unexpected turns than they think. There will be plenty of time to change jobs, change careers, change whole attitudes and approaches. They don not want to hear such liberating news. They want a map—right now – that they can follow unswervingly to career security, financial security, Social Security and, presumably, a prepaid grave.

What I wish for all students is some release from the clammy grip of the future. I wish them a chance to savor each segment of their education as an experience in itself and not as a grim preparation for the next step. I wish them the right to experiment, to trip and fall, to learn that defeat is as instructive as victory and is not the end of the world.

My wish, of course, is na?ve. One of the national gods venerated in our media—the million-dollar athlete, the wealthy executive—and glorified in our praise of possessions. In the presence of such a potent state religion, the young are growing up old.

I see four kinds of pressure working on college students today: economic pressure, parental pressure, peer pressure, and self-induced pressure. It is easy to look around for villains—to blame the colleges for charging too much money, the professors for assigning too much work, the parents for pushing their children too far, and the students for driving themselves too hard. But there are no villains: only victims.

“In the late 1960s.” one dean told me. “The typical question that I got from students was ‘Why is there so much suffering in the world’ or ‘how I can make a contribution?’ Today it’s ‘Do you think it would look better for getting into law school if I did a double major in history and political science, or just majored in one of them?’” many other deans confirmed this pattern. One said: “They are trying to find an edge—the intangible something that will look better on paper if two students are about equal.”

Note the emphasis on looking better. The transcript has become a sacred document, the passport to security. How one appears on paper is more important than how one appears in person. A is for Admirable and B is for Borderline, even though, in Yale’s official system of grading, A means “excellent” and B means “very good.” Today, looking very good is no longer good enough, especially for students who hope to go on to law school or medical school. They know that entrance into the better schools will be an entrance into the better law firms and better medical practices where they will make a lot of money. They also know that the odds are harsh. Yale Law School, for instance, matriculates 170students from an applicant pool of 3,700; Harvard enrolls 550 from a pool of 7,000.

It’s all very well for those of us who write letters of recommendation for our students to stress the qualities of humanity that will make them good lawyers or doctors. And it’s nice to think that admission officers are ready reading our letters and looking for the extra dimension of commitment or concern. Still, it would be hard for a student not to visualize these officers shuffling so many transcripts studded with As that they regard a B as positively shameful.

The pressure is almost as heavy on students who just want to graduate and get a job. Long gone are the days of the “gentleman’s C.” when students journeyed through college with a certain relaxation, sampling a wide variety of courses-music, art, philosophy, classics, anthropology, poetry, religion—that would send them out as liberally educated men and women. If I were an employer I would rather employ graduates who have this range and curiosity than those who narrowly pursued safe subjects and high grades. I know countless students whose inquiring minds exhilarate me. I like to hear the play of their ideas. I do not know if they are getting As or Cs, and I do not care. I also like them as people. The country needs them, and they will find satisfying jobs. I tell them to relax. They cannot.

Nor can I blame them. They live in a brutal economy. Tuition, room, and board at most private colleges now come to at least $7,000, not counting books and fees. This might seem to suggest that the colleges are getting rich. But they are equally battered by inflation. Tuition covers only 60 percent of what it costs to educate a student, and ordinarily the remainder comes from what college receives in endowments, grants, and gifts. Now, the remainder keeps being swallowed by the cruel costs—higher every year—of just opening the doors. Heating oil is up. Insurance is up. Postage is up. Health-premium costs are up. Everything is up. Deficits are up. We are witnessing in American the creation of a brotherhood of paupers—colleges, parents, and students, joined by the common bond of debt.

Today it is not unusual for a student, even if he works part time at college and full time during the summer, to accrue $5,000 in loans after four years—loans that he must start to repay within one year after graduation. Exhorted at commencement to go forth into the world, he is already behind as he goes forth. How could he not feel under pressure throughout college to prepare for this day of reckoning? I have used “he,” incidentally, only for brevity. Women at Yale are under no less pressure to justify their expensive education to themselves, their parents, and society. In fact, they are probably under more pressure. For although they leave college superbly equipped to bring fresh leadership to traditionally male jobs, society has not yet caught up with this fact.

Along with economic pressure goes parental pressure. Inevitably, the two are deeply intertwined.

I see many students taking pre-medical courses with joyless tenacity. They go off to their labs as if they were going to the dentist. It saddens me because I know tem in other corners of their life as cheerful people.

“Do you want to medical school?” I asked them.

“I guess so,” they say, without conviction, or “Not really.”

“Then why are you going?”

“Well, my parents want me to be a doctor. They are paying all this money and …”

Poor students, poor parents, they are caught in one of the oldest webs of love and duty and guilt. The parents mean will; they are trying to steer their sons and draughts toward a secure future. But the sons and daughter want to major in history or classics or philosophy—subjects with no “practical” value. Where’s the payoff on the humanities? It’s not easy to persuade such loving parents that the humanities do indeed pay off. The intellectual faculties developed by studying subjects like history and classics—an ability to synthesize and relate, to weigh cause and effect, to see events in perspective—are just the faculties that make creative leaders in business or almost any general field. Still, many fathers would rather put their money on courses that point toward specific profession—courses that are pre-law, pre-medical, pre-business, or, as I sometimes heard it put, “pre-rich.”

But the pressure on students is severe. They are truly torn. One part of them feels obliged to fulfill their parents’ expectations; after all, their parents are older and presumably wiser. Another part tells them that the expectations that are right for their parents are not right for them.

I know a student who wants to be an artist. She is very obviously an artist and will be a good one—she has already had several modest local exhibits. Meanwhile she is growing as a well-round person and taking humanistic subjects that will enrich the inner resources out of which her art will grow. But her father is strongly opposed. He thinks that an artist is a “dumb” thing to be. The student vacillates and tries to please everybody. She keeps up with her art somewhat furtively and takes some of the “dumb” courses her father wants her to take—at least they are dumb courses for her. She is a free spirit on a campus of tense students—no small achievement in it—and she deserves to follow her muse.

Peer pressure and self-induced pressure are also intertwined, and they begin almost at the beginning of freshman year.

“I had a freshman student I’ll call Linda,” one dean told me, “who came in and said she was under terrible pressure because her roommate, Barbara, was much brighter and studied all the time. I could not tell her that Barbara had come in two hours earlier to say the same thing about Linda.”

The story is almost funny—except that it is not. It is symptomatic of all the pressure put together. When every student thinks every other student is working harder and doing better, the only solution is to study harder still. I see students going off to the library every night after dinner and coming back when it closes at midnight. I wish they would sometimes forget about their peers and go to a movie. I hear the clacking of typewriters in the hours before dawn. I see the tension in their eyes when exams are approaching and papers are due: “Will I get everything done?”

Probably they won’t. They will get blocked. They will sleep. They will oversleep. They will bug out.

Part of the problem is that they are expected to do. A professor will assign five page papers. Several students will start writing ten page papers to impress him. Then more students will write ten page papers, and a few will raise the ante to fifteen. Pity the poor student who is still just doing the assignment.

“Once you have twenty or thirty percent of the student population deliberately overexerting,” one dean points out, “It’s bad for everybody. When a teacher gets more and more effort from his class, the student who is doing normal work can be perceived as not doing well. The tactic work, psychologically.”

Why cannot the professor just cut back and not accept longer papers? He can, and he probably will. But by then the term will be half over and the damage done. Grade fever is highly contagious and not easily reversed. Besides, the professor’s main concern is with his course. He knows his students only in relation to the course and does not know that they are also overexerting in their other courses. Nor is it really his business. He did not sign up for dealing with the student as a whole person and with all the emotional baggage the student brought along from home. That’s what deans, masters, chaplains, and psychiatrists are for.

To some extent this is nothing new: a certain number of professors have always been self-contained islands of scholarship and shyness, more comfortable with books than with people. But the new pauperism has widened the gap still further, for professors who actually like to spend time with students do not have as much time to spend. They are also overexerting. If they are young, they are busy trying to publish in order not to perish, hanging by their figure nails onto a shrinking profession.

If they are old and tenured, they are buried under the duties of administering departments—as departmental chairmen or members of committees—that have been thinned out by the budgetary axe.

Ultimately it will be the students’ own business to break the circles in which they are trapped. They are too young to be prisoners of their parents’ dreams and their classmates’ fears. They must be jolted into believing into themselves as unique men and women who have the power to shape their own future.

“Violence is being done to the undergraduate experience,” says Carlos Hortas. “College should be open-ended: at the end it should open many, many roads. Instead, students are choosing their goal in advance, and their choices narrow as they go along. It’s almost as if they think that the country has been codified in the type of jobs that exist-that they’ve got to fit into certain slots. Therefore, fit into the best paying slot.”

“They ought to take chances. Not taking chances will lead to life of colorless mediocrity. They’ll be comfortable. But something in the spirit will be missing.”

I have painted too drab a portrait of today’s students, making them seem a solemn lot. That is only half of their story; if they were so dreary I wouldn’t so thoroughly enjoy their company. The other half is that they are easy to like. They are quick to laugh and to offer friendship. They are not introverts. They are usually kind and are more considerate of one another than any student generation I have known.

Nor are they so obsessed with their studies that they avoid sports and extracurricular activities. On the contrary, they juggle their crowded hours to play on a variety of teams, perform with musical and dramatic groups, and write for campus publications. But this in turn is one more cause of anxiety. There are too many choices. Academically, they have 1,300 courses to select from; outside class they have to decide how much spare time they can spare and how to spend it.

This means that they engage in fewer extracurricular pursuits than their predecessors did. If they want to row on the crew and play in the symphony they will eliminate one; in the ‘60s they would have done both. They also tend to choose activities that are self-limiting. Drama, for instance, is flourishing in all twelve of Yale’s residential colleges, as it never has before. Students hurl themselves into these productions—as actors, directors, carpenters, and technicians—with a dedication to create the best possible play, knowing that the day will come when the run will end and they can get back to their studies.

They also cannot afford to be the willing slave of organizations like the Yale Daily News. Last spring at the one-hundredth anniversary banquet of that paper—who’s past chairmen include such once and future kings as Potter Stewart, Kingman Brewster, and William F. Buckley, Jr.—much was made of the fact that the editorial staff used to be small and totally committed and that “newsies” routinely worked fifty hours a week. In effect they belonged to a club; Newsies is how they defined themselves at Yale. Today’s students will one or two articles a week, when he can, and he defines himself as a student. I’ve never heard the word Newsie except at the banquet.

If I have described the modern undergraduate primarily as a driven creature who is largely ignoring the blithe spirit inside who keeps trying to come out and play, it’s because that’s where the crunch is, not only at Yale but throughout American education. It’s why I think we should all be worried about the values that are nurturing a generation so fearful of risk and so goal-obsessed at such an early age.

I tell students that there is no one “right” way to get ahead—that each of them is a different person, starting from a different point and bound for a different destination. I tell neither them that change is a tonic and that all the slots are not codified nor the frontiers closed. One of my ways of telling them is to invite men and women who have achieved success outside the academic world to come and talk informally with my students during the year. They are heads of companies or ad agencies, editors of magazines, politicians, public officials, television magnates, labor leaders, business executives, Broadway products, artists, writers, economists, photographers, scientists, historians—a mixed bag of achievers.

I asked them to say a few words about how they got started. The students assume that they started in their present profession and knew all along that it was what they wanted to do. Luckily for me, most of them got into their field by a circuitous route, to their surprise, after many detours. The students are startled. They can hardly conceive of a career that was not pre-planned. They can hardly imagine allowing the hand of God or chance to nudge them down some unforeseen trail.

11. To Err Is Wrong

In the summer of 1979, Boston Red Sox first baseman Carl Yastrzemski became the fifteenth player in baseball history to reach the three thousand hit plateaus. This event drew a lot of media attention, and for about a week prior to the attainment of this goal, hundreds of reports covered Yaz’s every more. Finally, one reporter asked, “Hey Yaz, aren’t you afraid all of this attention will go to your head?” Yastrzemski replied, “I look at this way: in my career I’ve been up to bat over ten thousand times. That means I’ve been unsuccessful at the plate over seven thousand times. That fact alone keeps me from getting a swollen head.”?

Most people consider success and failure as opposites, but they are actually both products of the same process. As Yaz suggest, an activity that produces a hit may also produce a miss. It is the same with creative thinking; the same energy that generates good creative ideas also produces errors.

Many people, however, are not comfortable with errors. Our educational system, based on “the right answer” belief, cultivates our thinking in another, more conservative way. From an early age, we are taught that right answers are good and incorrect answers are bad. This value is deeply embedded in the incentive system used in most schools:

Right over 90% of the time = “A”

Right over 80% of the time = “B~”

Right over 70% of the time = “C~” Right over 60% of the time = “D~” Less than 60% correct, you fail.

From this we learn to be right as often as possible and to keep our mistakes to a minimum. We learn, in other words, that “to err is wrong.

Playing It Safe

With this kind of attitude, you aren’t going to be taking too many chances. If you learn that failing even a litter penalizes you (e.g., being wrong only 15% of the time garners you only a “B” performance), you learn not to make mistakes. And more important, you learn not to put yourself to situation where you might fall. This leads to conservative thought pattern designed to avoid the stigma our society puts on “failure”.

I have a friend who recently graduated from college with a Master’s degree in Journalism. For the last six month, she has been trying to find a job, but to no avail. I talked with her about situation, and realized that her problem is that she doesn’t know how to fail. She went through eighteen years of schooling to try any approaches where she might fail. She has been conditioned to believe that failure is bad in and of itself, rather than a potential stepping-stone to new ideas.

Look around. How many middle managers, housewives, administrators, teachers, and other people do you see who are to try anything new because of this failure? Most of us have learned not to make mistakes in public. As a result, we remove ourselves from many learning experience except for those occurring in the most private of circumstances.

Different Logic

From a practical point of view, “to err is wrong” makes sense. Our survival in the everyday world requires us to perform thousand of small tasks without failure. Think about it: you wouldn’t last very long if you were to step out in front of traffic or stick your hand a pot of boiling water. In addition, engineers whose bridges collapse, stock brokers who lose money for their clients, and copywriters whose ad campaigns decrease sales won’t keep their jobs very long.

Nevertheless, too great an adherence to the belief “to err is wrong” can greatly undermine your attempts to generate new ideas. If you are more concerned with producing right answers than generating original ideas, you’ll probably make uncritical use of the rules, formulae, and procedures used to obtain these right answers. By doing this, you’ll by-pass the germinal phase of the creative process, and thus spend litter time testing assumptions, challenging the rules, asking what-if questions, or just playing around with the problem. All of these techniques will produce some incorrect answers, but in the germinal phase errors are viewed as a necessary by-product of creative thinking. As Yaz would put it, “if you want the hits, be prepared for the misses.” That’s the way the game of life goes.

Errors as Stepping Stones

Whenever an error pops up, the usual response is “Jeez, another screw up, what went wrong this time?” the creative thinker, on the other hand, will realize the potential value of errors, and perhaps say something like, “Would you look at that! Where can it lead our thinking?” and then he or she will go on to use the error as a stepping stone to a new idea. As a matter of fact, the whole history of discovery is filed with people who used erroneous assumptions and failed ideas as stepping-stones to new ideas. Columbus thought he was finding a shorter route to India. Johannes Kepler stumbled on to the idea of interplanetary gravity because of assumptions that were right for the wrong reasons. And, Thomas Edison knew 1800 ways not to build a light bulb.

The following story about the automotive genius Charles Kettering exemplifies the spirit of working through erroneous assumptions to good ideas. In 1912, when the automobile industry was just beginning to grow, Kettering was interested in improving gasoline engine efficiency. The problem he faced was“knockthe phenomenon in which gasoline takes too long to burn in the cylinder-thereby reducing efficiency.

Kettering began searching for ways to eliminate the “knock.” He thought to him, “How can I get the gasoline to combust in the cylinder at an earlier time?” the key concept here is “early”. Searching for analogous situations, he looked around for models of “things that happen early.” He thought of historical models, physical models, and biological models. Finally, he remembered a particular plant, the trailing arbutus, which “happens early,” i.e., it blooms in the snow (“earlier” than other plants). One of this plant’s chief characteristics is its’ red leaves, which help the plant retain light at certain wavelengths. Kettering figured that it must be the red color, which made the trailing arbutus bloom earlier.

Now came the critical step in Kettering’s chain of thought. He asked himself, “How can I make the gasoline red?” perhaps I’ll put red dye in the gasoline—maybe that’ll make it combust earlier.” He looked around his workshop, and found that he didn’t have any red dye. But he did happen to have some iodine—perhaps that would do. He added the iodine to the gasoline and, lo and behold, the engine didn’t “knock”.

[英语作文写作的需要背诵的部分

我坐在窗前，顺手拿起一本《初中生普法教育》，读完后，我深有感触，受益匪浅。

随着时间的推移，我们已经是初二学生了。然而对普法教育这方面却知之甚少。作为一名初中生，我想我们很有必要了解有关这方面的内容，这将对我们的生活有很大帮助。

什么是普法教育?顾名思义，就是一种极其普遍的法律法规教育。告诉我们在初中阶段应该注意的事。例如不要早恋，要注重学习。其中一篇就是讲早恋给我们带来的危害。小军和小丽两人互有好感，到后来竟然发展成怀孕。真是令人难以想象啊!最终，双方父母知道后免不了责骂，为了各家孩子今后的人生，只能采取堕胎。唉，真是令人哀叹啊!我们千万不能向他们学习。我们正处于青春期，很容易掉入早恋的泥潭。要正确认识早恋，与异性正确交往，才能做到健康快乐的成长。

随着人们生活水平的提高，喝酒的人越来越多，几乎已经成为生活中不可缺少的一部分了。要知道，喝酒不仅误事，还会闹出人命呢!小朋过生日邀请小朱，小朱因为开心于是就多喝了几杯，随后倒在沙发上昏睡了过去，小鹏没有叫醒他以为他睡着了就出去玩了，到了第二天时，才发现已经叫不醒他，连忙把他送去医院，可是为时已晚，他不幸因为喝酒过多而酒精中毒死亡。唉，这样一条年轻的生命离我们而去了。由此我们可以看出，喝酒给我们带来的危害是多么严重。多么令人惋惜啊!我们一定要引以为戒。读完普法教育这本书后，我想其中的例子告诉我们的不仅仅是一个个惨痛的教训，更是血的事实。

青少年应该多读有用的书，这样我们就会收获的更多。

基层党组织是开展党的活动的基本单位,其担负着教育管理党员、发展新党员、执行党的纪律的重要责任,是我党在社会基层组织中的战斗堡垒，是党的全部工作和战斗力的基础。因此,在基层党组织开展“两学一做”即“学党章党规、学系列讲话，做合格党员”学习教育,对于提高党员素质,发挥基层组织凝聚力和战斗力具有十分重要的意义。

开展“两学一做”学习教育，基础在学。基层党支部按照“三会一课”制度，定期召开党员大会，上党课，围绕党章党规、系列讲话开展主题教育活动，全面理解党的纲领，牢记党员义务和权利，坚定入党信念，广泛宣传《中国共产党廉洁自律准则》、《中国共产党纪律处分条例》等党内法规，坚决抵制拜金主义、享乐主义和奢侈之风，联系个人思想工作生活实际，加强理论武装，认真学习习近平总书记系列讲话精神，坚定理想信念，引导广大党员坚定不移的走中国特色社会主义道路，忠于党的事业、坚持党的路线、维护党的原则，与党中央保持一致。

开展“两学一做”学习教育，基础在学，关键在做,学做结合,以做带学。积极参加支部党员大会、组织生活会和民主生活会，加强自身党性修养，把对党章党规、系列讲话学习践于工作实际，以知促行，发挥党员先锋模范作用。在农村、社区，重点落实无职党员设岗定责和承诺践诺评诺制度，做到年初有承诺，年终有评诺，鼓励广大党员干部立足岗位实际，尽职尽责，为民服务，发挥党员模范带头作用，积极为党的事业担当作为。

开展“两学一做”学习教育促进了基层服务型党组织建设，是新时期强化基层党组织凝聚力，提高广大党员干部党性修养，充分发挥基层党组织战斗堡垒作用的具体要求。

理想的社会并不是指定绝对理想的社会，而是相对于存在的一些社会性质而言的相对理想的社会，只要哲学仍有开拓的领域，那探索就不会终止，科学也不会终止，所以绝对的理想是难以想象的，是难以定论的。

当一个社会不再非常需要更新式的哲学时，那这个当是一个理想的社会，或者是一个接近理想的社会。因为已经足够美好了，不再需要做更多的探索了，已经探索的领域足够广泛，并且得到了科学的验证。如果没有哲学，那就不是理想的，反而是极度危险的社会，甚至整个民族都是带着蒙昧的。而理想的社会它有丰富的哲学，它不是哲学的衰落，而是对既定哲学的维持。理想的社会驻着的是充满了哲学人生的国度。

理想的社会或者是马克思式的，或者是无政府式的，或者……更有可能的是一种其他形式的。

无论是社会主义，还是无政府主义，还是其他主义，但有一点可以肯定，理想的社会绝对是一个美好的社会，它是一个能够实现美好人生的社会，或者让绝大多数人都能够体现出美好的人生。美好的人生需要知识和爱才能促发。如果缺乏了知识，就会盲从，甚至愚昧。只有知识没有爱，那就会导致冷漠无情，没有温度、没有温暖。所以美好的社会它又是一个充满了知识和爱的社会。

知识如何才能充分地去引导，温暖如何才能更趋饱满，人生如何才能走向美好，这想必就是高度的自由和高度的正义。所以一个美好的社会它不一定无政府，但它更偏向于无政府，因为它有高度的自由。它也可能是理念的社会主义，因为它有高度的正义。它更可能是既有政府又无政府，这样自由与正义也许更能完美的结合，结合的两者更能高度的体现。可以肯定的是它是一个绝对民主的社会，没有任何的独裁专治和剥削。

一个国家要怎样实现没有任何的独裁而只有绝对的民主呢?这攸关到一个国家的政体。那么政府到底起着什么作用呢?

当社会走向一种极不平衡时，那政府的作用就该显现了。政府无非就是起到一个调控的作用，调不和以谐和，控不善以完善。于是乎，政府就成了公正的代名词，戴上了公正的桂冠。可政府真的能公能正吗?真的能做到绝对的无私吗?

政府担当着国家的主脑，掌握着国家的信息，拥有至上的权力。权力往往导致腐化。一个政权能做到通盘考虑人民的利益而不是执政者、当权者的利益，那是极伟大的。人都是有私心的。私心再加上行权的能力，那恐怕人民利益放在首位就很难说了。能做到不去干涉和限制思想的自由和言论的自由的国家是极少的，而绝对地允许言论的自由和思想的自由的国家可以说是没有的。

如果一个政府足够开明，那么它的作用就是引导它的人民走向开明，使整个社会昌明起来。如果一个民族的人民都走向了开明，社会也一派昌明，那政府的职能又是什么呢?

人就一定需要政府的引导吗?根据经济学家亚当斯密的“看不见的手”这一著名理论，如果政府不去干涉市场，那么市场也许会运作的更好，不平衡的最终自会平衡。这也很符合道家哲学的无为而治，无为，社会也能大治。

如果人类都能自发地走向开明，社会也能够逐渐昌明起来，那政府的作用就显得微乎其微了。如果人们都已经到了自发自觉的地步，社会公德成了一种极为寻常的事情，犯罪的案例开始销声匿迹，那法律的启用将会极大的降低，因为已经不再很需要明文条款去约束了，这时无政府按理更能够通行。

12月4日是首个“国家宪法日”，为积极迎接宪法日的到来，我校从12月1日起，全校开展丰富多彩的活动。

一、全校各班级在12月1日开展以《让法律看守世界》为主题的班会课，班会课上各班同学积极探讨“法律与自由”的关系，引导同学们“用规则看守生活，拥有美丽人生;用法律看守世界，世界充满阳光。”

二、全体学生在12月3日集中，由黄少俊老师组织全体同学学习宪法相关知识，并结合现阶段学生的安全问题，对全体同学进行了安全教育。

三、12月4日，团委通过校园广播进行“宪法日”相关知识的全校宣传，使同学们进一步认识“宪法”在国家的发展中的重要地位。

四、开展全校法制宣传手抄报及法制宣传征文活动活动，12月4日放学前，我校一共征集法制征文100余篇，语文组进行评选，最后评选出一等奖6名、二等奖10名，三等奖15名。征集法制宣传手抄报50余张，评出一等奖5名，二等奖8名，三等奖10名。

这次宪法宣传日活动的开展，又一次敲响了法制教育的警钟，使我校师生又一次受到了法制教育，培养孩子的法律意识和法治观念，深入践行社会主义核心价值观，营造出尊重宪法、宪法至上、用宪法维护权益的良好社会氛围。

干部作风，事关发展大计，事关民生福祉，事关党和政府形象。在我市召开市级机关作风整顿动员大会后，市直部门单位迅速行动，认真部署，相继召开机关作风整顿动员会，并结合自身实际，明确目标任务，突出特点特色，确保活动开好局、起好步。

——着力解决懒政怠政庸政等“为官不为”的问题，切实增强转作风、提效能的紧迫性和主动性，确保机关作风建设持续扎实推进。市公安局要求，全市公安机关和干警要以开展大学习、大查摆、大培训、大创新、大晾晒为载体，借作风整顿之机，坚决打赢这场着力解决“为官不为”问题的攻坚战。共青团市委要求，把机关作风整顿作为一项重大任务来抓，对敏感程序和重点领域、重点岗位开展明察暗访，对各种“为官不为”的行为严肃处理，将作风整顿考核评价与干部任用、奖惩、问责有机结合起来，在全市团委系统形成学习先进、争做先进的良好风气。市统计局要求全局干部职工，认真查找精神状态、综合素质、创新意识、服务水平、数据质量、统计调查、办事效率、工作落实、遵规守纪、清正廉洁等方面存在的不足，分析根源，制定措施，坚决整改纠正，真正解决“不能为、不想为、不敢为”等问题。

——结合各自实际，突出问题导向，对照八种新风正气，找差距，查不足，务求抓出实效。市财政局明确提出，要解放思想，推进财政改革创新、强化资金绩效管理、破解发展资金瓶颈，把出亮点作为财政工作的主题，着力打造人无我有、人有我优、在全国全省扛旗夺牌的亮点，创造更多的“沧州模式”。市住建局要求干部职工，对照“四个不适应”和“八个突出问题”查摆出的32项问题，立即开展自查自纠，盯住薄弱环节和重点工作，追根溯源、见人见物，立行立改、综合施策，确保整改到位。市交通运输局对查摆问题要求局领导班子带头，所属各级领导班子和每一名干部，逐一查摆问题，并分别列出清单，针对问题立行立改，确保实现“一月见变化，三月见成效，半年基本整改到位”的目标。

——把整顿成果最终落到更好地服务发展、服务群众上。市政府研究室提出，所有参加学习人员要记好学习笔记，撰写体会文章，深刻认识机关作风中存在的突出问题，认真查找，逐条拉出单子，分析原因，制定整改措施，严肃认真整改。作风整顿要与改革创新、做好本部门工作结合起来，努力推动沧州经济发展。市妇联提出，在全体党员中开展党性党风党纪和道德品行教育，深化基层干部损害群众利益专项整治，对落实重大决策部署不力，违反政治、组织、工作和群众纪律的严肃问责，以督查问责倒逼工作落实。市中心医院要求全院强化服务意识，更新服务理念，营造职能科室围着一线转，医技科室围着临床转，医护围着患者转，干部围着群众转，全院围着服务转的良好氛围。同时，亮化服务窗口，细化服务措施，强化服务保障，进一步提高全院整体服务水平，让患者和群众切身感受到作风整顿带来的深刻变化。

孩子，是每一位父母心中的宝贝，我们都盼望着她们茁壮地成长，在教育孩子的过程中，除了老师之外，父母也扮演着重要的主角。家庭教育和学校教育同样至关重要。

女儿今年6周岁半，刚上小学一年级，在教育孩子成长的过程中，我最深的体会是：

一、温馨、和睦的家庭环境是孩子健康成长的源泉

家是孩子们主要的活动场所，家庭气氛的好坏直接影响着孩子的身心健康。父母绝不能经常在孩子面前拌舌头吵嘴，那样会使孩子产生恐惧、自卑甚至厌恶的心理。不仅仅会疏远孩子与父母之间的感情，在同伴之间还可能会出现偏激行为现象。给孩子一个安全、舒适、温暖的家，是教子的第一步，家人之间要相亲相爱，和睦相处。在这方面，我们是以实际行动让女儿感受到了亲情的温暖。

二、逐步培养孩子的优良品德很重要

女儿从3周岁起上幼儿园，步入正规的教育系统，我们要为她的人生的第一步打好基础，在生活的点点滴滴中培养她一些优良品德，借此也可改掉“以自我为中心”的当代独生子女的通病。比如：给她讲讲“孔融让梨”的故事，并付诸于实际行动，让她明白尊敬长辈的道理;告诉她帮忙别人是件很开

心的事，让她明白就应助人为乐;在和小伙伴之间嬉戏时要相互谦让等等。闲暇时，常和女儿做连句的游戏，我说上句：“妹妹摔倒了。”女儿连下句：“我立刻把她扶起来。”……乐此不疲。

三、让孩子“自我来”，培养孩子的动手和自理潜力

成人对孩子教育的重视程度直接影响到孩子是否会养成良好的行为习惯，成人重视与否，教育方法正确与否，首先是观念问题。有些家长望子成龙，学习上不断加大压力，生活上关怀备至，却将良好行为习惯置之脑后，听之任之。我认为孩子爱劳动良好习惯尤为重要。让孩子参加力所能及的劳动，不仅仅能够培养孩子的劳动习惯和勤劳的品德，而且能够培养孩子的独立性、职责感、自信心、意志力等良好素质和各种潜力。因此，在我女儿很小时，我就开始让她干一些力所能及的家务活。如：收拾玩具、穿衣、洗手绢、洗袜子、整理床铺等，当然，孩子干活常常不必须能够干不好，就此我们不能以成人的标准去评价他们。只要孩子作出了努力，家长就要充分肯定。对他们来说是一种挑战，需要孩子付出很大努力。

四、让孩子少一点压力，多一份简单。在学习之余要注意让孩子适当放松，每晚抽出半小时进行散步、慢跑，并利用这一时光，了解孩子的精神需要，并经常和孩子谈心，随时观察其身心的变化，善于利用生活小事，敞开心扉，学会用欣赏的目光看待自我的孩子，善于捕捉她身上的闪光点，不要将子女与别人的孩子相比，将子女的此刻和过去进行比较，纵向看进步，及时发现和肯定自我孩子所获得的任何一点成绩，使孩子感受到我们的赞美和鼓励，提高孩子的自信心和良好的学习习惯。

孩子的心田是敏感的，撒下什么样的种子就会开出什么样的花果，就会有什么样的收获，因此，我真诚地期望家长们撒下的是美丽、善良、友爱的种子。让美丽、善良、友爱的花开满孩子的心田。不要让“望子成龙”的心理变成孩子的压力，顺其自然，因材施教，让孩子轻简单松学习，要相信：是金子总是会发光的!

要说吾班啥时最热闹，那肯定数课堂时分。请看排名榜！

NO·4

获奖者：陈铭（恭喜！女生最棒！）

“英雄”事迹：数学课上，一道题使大家都陷入了沉思，一旁的老师在那里不断地提示，提示，再提示。这不，不到三秒，一只修长的手臂高高地伸到半空，这只手臂因唯一而显得格外地至高无上。“好，陈铭！”她站起身来慢慢地讲解道。虽然声音不大，但是对于鸦雀无声的教室来说可算得上是一声吼了！“哦——”她坐下了，同学们头上的一团团云雾也顿时烟消云散！

NO·3

获奖者：邵张杰（是男生耶。不过照样恭喜！）

“英雄”事迹：北风呼呼，今日的课堂显得异常得宁静，同学们大概是“身在课堂，心在床”吧！这不，老师的问题都出口三十秒了，还无人举手，要是平时，早就闹翻天了！忽然，邵张杰第一个举手，寒风吹着他那已经冻得通红的手（好一只不怕冷的北极熊）。他的举动像一个小闹钟，把每个人的活跃细胞都唤醒了，教室里又沸腾起来……

NO·2

获奖者：张安杰（哼，怎么又是男生，不服——）

“英雄”事迹：说起张安杰回答问题，那就快张大嘴巴，等着笑吧！快听，一阵哄笑，肯定又是他在发表大论。听听，一个神话也能是人种分布的原因？那傻子都知道是不不不不不不可能的。再听，科学课上的他显得更加猖狂，老师在做实验，他在侃侃而谈；老师在讲课，他又惹得大家哈哈大笑！可是你问问题，他又能脱口而出，你说这怎么办才好！

（哇，该揭晓第一名了真紧张！）

NO·1

获奖者：季杨（真好！哎呀，说错话了，不好，不好，不好！各位宽容大量的女侠可别再用目光“杀”我了，我好怕怕！）

“英雄”事迹：“*&%￥。”呱啦啦说了一大堆，谁都没听懂，只好卷土重来，可怜的季杨又要浪费点口水了。你可要知道，他的课外知识在我们班可是打遍天下无敌手的！每次的回答都令人赞不绝口。同时，他还是一个小问号，总是学小沈阳那样不停的说：“这是为什么呢？这是为什么呢？”这使得同学们头晕脑涨的，就连老师也毫无办法。不过正是因为他的种种问题，才是我们课堂增色不少！

时至岁末，回过头来，梳理一年的过程，是我们在行进途中不忘初心的温故知新。近日，由国家语言资源监测与研究中心、商务印书馆和人民网共同主办的“汉语盘点2014”活动揭晓榜单。在9个候选字当中，“法”拔得头筹，成为2014年度国内字。

“法”成为年度字，与法治的里程碑——四中全会，不无关系。无论是聂树斌案的异地复查，还是呼格吉勒图时隔18年的沉冤昭雪，在全面推进依法治国的图景下，一桩桩案件背后，是法治的阳光，穿透“法治雾霾”，照到坚实的大地上，让更多老百姓能够感受到它的温暖，更是法治的种子在人们心中发芽，法治思维的步步养成，逐渐成为一种神圣的信仰。

而这，有赖于法治元素的不断完善。从提出建立负面清单、权力清单、责任清单，塑造“法无禁止即可，法无授权不可为”的法治政府，厘清政府与市场的边界;到深化司法体制改革，迈过“地方化”和“行政化”两道坎，一头挑起司法公信，一头挑起司法公正;再到确立“宪法日”，让宪法这一根本大法走向每一个公民，形成知法、守法、信法、用法的良好氛围，法治的“全链条”，每一层堤坝得到了前所未有的加固。

当然，无论是顶层的设计，还是信仰的建立，无一不依赖于改革。改革和法治，分别是近两届中央全会的主题，而这，也揭示了法治中国建设的历史辩证法：用改革推进法治建设，以法治为改革大船护航。法治，它既是凝聚改革共识的粘合剂，也是保证改革大船不偏离航道的指南针，更是降低改革成本的蓄水池。一言以蔽之，法治乃是全面深化改革的题中应有之义，

即将到来的2015年，一定意义上，是全面推进依法治国的元年。在这个元年里，我们需要更多、更细致的改革措施，也需要更多的改革担当者，让法治像呼吸一样，成为人们自然的行为。

在我们身边，一些同学老是犯错误，法律纪律观念淡薄，屡教不改。认为：只要自我不去杀人放火就行了，犯点小错误又有什么大不了的呢?俗话说得好：“小时偷针，大时偷金。”“小时偷油，大时偷牛。”这就告诉了我们：如果一个人从小就没有养成良好的行为习惯，没有良好的法律纪律意识，随意做损坏公物，打人，骂人，甚至偷窃等坏事，不仅仅仅是给你个人的形象抹黑，而且会渐渐腐蚀你的心灵。渐渐地，就会使你经常情不自禁地犯这样那样的错误。如果不能够痛改前非，继续发展下去，那些恶习就会在你心理根深蒂固，而且会越变越严重。到时，你很可能走上犯罪的道路，最终等待你的，就只有失去人生自由的监狱了。这并不是危言耸听，近年来青少年犯罪率呈上升趋势，便是证明。青少年正处在长身体、长才干的时期，可塑性很强。但明辨是非的潜力不强，意志脆弱，自控力不强，很容易受到外界的影响，一步步走上不轨之路。

虽然我们青少年犯罪呈上升趋势，但也时常受到侵害。此刻尽管有老师、家长的保护，但他们不可能时时刻刻都在我们身边呵护着我们，况且总有一天我们会离开父母，离开学校，踏入社会，独立生活的。所以，自我保护也就成了我们中学生防止自身受到伤害的必要措施了。为了避免同学之间产生矛盾，就应严于律己，不能自我去惹事生非，挑起事端，导致别人对你的不满，轻则吵架，重则就会出现结伙斗殴，事故也会随之而发生。到时，不仅仅会给自我的家庭造成沉重的经济负担，而且还会使你受到肉体上的痛苦和心灵的折磨，后悔也来不及了。相反，如果同学们都尊重别人，互相谦让，真诚待人，你也会因尊重别人而受到别人的尊重，这样，同学之间不仅仅会建立起真挚的友谊，我们的校园也会呈现出一种欣欣向荣的礼貌景象。

这次法制讲座给我们上了很好的一课，使同学们深深感悟到遵守校规校纪的重要性。为了我们能够健康成长，为了我们完美的明天，让我们从此刻开始，严于律己，改掉不良习惯，做一个合格的当代中学生吧!

2017年的元旦就要来临了，元旦三天的小长假让人兴奋，那么关于元旦的高速路是否免费呢，看看下面的范文吧。

初步了解，根据国家交通运输部发布的文件《重大节假日免收小型客车通行费实施方案》，仅针对春节、清明节、劳动节、国庆节四个重要节假日，实施7座(包括7座)以下小型客车高速公路免费通行的政策，但不包括元旦、端午节和中秋节。

由此可以看出元旦不在免通行费节假日之列，所以2017年元旦高速公路不免费。

2017年元旦放假时间安排表：

2017年1月1日至1月3日调休，放假3天

2017年1月1日(星期日)为国家法定节假日

2017年1月4日(星期三)照常上班。

2017年高速节假日免费时间表：

2017年春节假期

2017年春节假期高速免费时间为2017年1月27日0点(除夕)——2017年2月2日24点

2017年清明节假期

2017年清明节假期高速免费时间为2017年4月2日0点——2017年4月4日24点

2017年劳动节假期

2017年劳动节假期高速免费时间为2017年5月1日0点——2017年5月7日24点

2017年国庆节假期

2017年国庆节假期高速免费时间为2017年10月1日0点——2017年10月7日24点

免责声明：本站此信息仅供参考。

更多热门文章：